Rip
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927 |
It depends, was the dog treeing the little tree or was he just proped up on it winding the coon. All he has to do is show tree with the coon in it, if he was treeing up the little tree then rightfully minus, if he was treeing the coon then plus. All it takes is a little common sense. If the judge determined he was treeing the coon then he would have no choice but to plus by the rules, however if he determined the dog to be treeing up the small tree in your example or the fencepost in the original post then he had no choice but to minus. There is a reason dogs are observed on the tree. Nowhere does it say the dog must have it's feet on the wood, only that they must show tree. If a dog was at the top of a bluff treeing a coon directly in front of it, even though he can't get to the base of the tree because of the bluff he is still plused.
I would say in your case the the judge determined the dog in question was treeing up the little tree instead of treeing on the coon. If he honestly felt that way then he had no choice but to minus.
Using the logic of minusing the dog on the fencepost then you would have to let a NtCh get away with treeing a possum in a sapling just because there wasn't room enough on the tree for all dogs and one of them proped up one tree over, looking at the possum and treeing his head off. However, since he didn't have his feet on the possum tree would you let him stay in the cast? I can tell you I would scratch him just as quick as the rest cause he was treeing the possum I don't care what tree his feet were touching.
Would you minus a dog in a pasture standing on his hind feet treeing a coon on a power line? The coon is there but there is no tree for him to tree up but he treed it on the powerline just the same. That is a plus tree too even though he is in a pasture with no tree in sight.
We would have to be there, but if the dog was treeing the coon then he should be plussed cause he WAS showing the proper tree. If he was treeing the wrong tree then he should be minused. That is a judgement call but most judges should be able to tell whether it was treeing the coon or not or they shouldn't be judging.
Don't get me wrong, I am a pretty strict judge and plus and minus accordingly whether it helps me or hurts me, but I also observe the dogs on the tree too and I know what a layup dog is and how they sometimes tree under the coon instead of feet on the wood. If you have a babbler or a slick treeing dog you won't like drawing out with me cause you will get the minus you deserve, but no more no less.
__________________
Let's go huntin
Last edited by Rip on 07-02-2003 at 07:09 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|