larrypoe
Banned
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: bronaugh,MO
Posts: 2595 |
This is one rule that has always bugged me. I absolutly hate a silent dog and wont breed one no matter what other qualitys it has. Instant cull at my house.
That being said I have never found a real good way to prove a dog was silent in 2 hours. Different terrain, tracking condishions, weather, if the coon are moving or not, ect. come in play.
Bringing us to the wording of the rule. "Continuously silent". For how long? 1 track? Most of a track? The entire cast?
To me it leaves way too much room for personal opinion, and can be used or not used to whatever degree a judge sees fit.
Around here you usualy draw from a pool of maybe 25 open dogs and 10 or 15 ntchs in a given area who may or may not be at the hunt that night. By the end of the year you know most of the dogs almost as well as your own. Most you have drawn a couple times, some more, by the end of the year. Under those guidelines I feel I could make a pretty good judgement call on a dog being silent.
If I go to say AO where there are literaly hundreds of dogs to draw from you have never seen before and will probably never see agian, Im not so sure you can make that call in a 2 hour hunt.
Plain and simple it could be way to easy to abuse.
BTW Todd,
I remember you adressing this on here, but dont remember an revised Adviser on it either. Could have missed it pretty easy, but I dont remember it.
The last word I remember on it was last year when you said on here in your opinion 3 tracks where a dog just fell treed was grounds to scratch for being silent.
I would sure like to read it if there was one, just to be on the same page.
__________________
GRNTCH GRCH ROBINSONS ENGLISH LOOSER
RIP Loose
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|