Katgirl
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 44 |
I know I am going to catch alot of grief over this, but I just find it ironic that a Veterinarian who "takes an oath to do no harm" and they "take it very seriously", yet the advise is to do to the pups as the owner sees fit. Does this include killing the pups? What about shooting coon out to a dog to help with the training? Does this include deer hunting or turkey hunting? Is this "taking the oath seriously". I am not down on anyone for hunting, I do it , but to claim one thing as a professional and do the opposite is pretty contradictatory. Just happened to read this and found it interesting. JMO, another reason to watch out for people who talk out of both sides of their mouths. I am sure the moderators will delete this post, but I feel these are valid questions. "The shot" seems to be alot more humane way to handle the situation. But what do I know! Maybe pushing spaying over "the shot" has more to do with finances. I'm sure a spay cost alot more than a shot. Again, JMO, and I am not trying to belittle anyone.
Last edited by Katgirl on 05-17-2006 at 12:48 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|