NoahC
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Chester, Va
Posts: 172 |
Thanks for the data
Love the list, good read. I only have a few comments...
1 - Families do seem to continue, however the outcross wonders with good #s seem to fade more quickly. Where's gen 3, or 2 in some cases, on some of those guys... #9,10,11,15? I'm not picking, I like some of these dog's background.
2 - 'Breeder' is not accurate, seems to capture who owned the dog last, e.g. I'm fairly certain Nitro was breed by Dan Night
3 - What's the story on Lewis's Jim - what barn is he tied behind?
Personally, I dont' think you breed for great dogs. I think you focus on good dogs, and if you are following proven procedures, very rarely a great one comes along. A lot of what we think of as great, are simply good dogs with the right people behind them. I'd like to see great, but I don't know that they exist. It's like laryngitis, I've never had it, so I still think people are full of it.
Thanks,
Noah
__________________
A Proud Member Of Virginia Coalition for Procyon Lotor Management & Control
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|