UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > .
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Bruce M. Conkey
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

.

First thing is you should compare the differences between the two and if you can live them, then consider the 220. If you want the features the 320 have over the 220 then that is where you should go.

As far as good handheld GPS that can track dogs they both work exceptionally well. Just the 220 has some limits on internal storage and what collars and mapping programs will work with it.

On the 220 no DC 50's will work and Birdseye Sat. mapping won't work and your limited to tracks you can save if your into mapping hunting area roads.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-23-2014 01:51 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)