JiM
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: New Paris, Indiana
Posts: 7076 |
July's Coonhound Advisor
Just got my July Bloodlines mag. I headed straight to the Advisor column like I always do and got a bit of a surprise with the second question tackled which involved a dog treed on a den den with both a possum and a coon.
Right up front, Paul commented that it is very doubtful that any of us will ever see this exact situation during our nite hunt careers so this is one of those questions that is much more about the discussion than it will ever be about any practical application of the ruling. But I sure think Paul missed on this one. Why? Well, because forever it has been ruled that any time a dog(s) tree on tree that that holds both off game and a coon, you plus the dog for the coon. I'm not aware of any instance where UKC has ever ruled otherwise. And in this Advisor article, Paul confirms that. Coon and possum on outside, he says plus it. Coon outside, possum inside den, plus it. But then he comes up with this exception for a coon on the outside, possum in a hole in the bottom of the tree just out of dogs reach, minus or scratch for off game. The reasoning being that we all know the dog treed the possum that it was obviously trying to pull out if it could have reached it. All of this makes sense and seems the right way to handle it until you consider the way things work in the real world. This ruling in the Advisor now opens the door for another argument in the woods every time a den is made with any off game and a coon. Now the judge has to decide is the offgame in that den positioned to indicate the dog treed the offgame or does that judge rule the old way that said off game in a den/coon outside gets plussed for the coon. In the real word,, this new ruling will be another reason to argue in the woods. I'm thinking it would have been better just to say, look, this particular situation is a once-in-10-lifetimes situation so we are gonna just stay consistent with how we have always ruled and say if a coon is seen in the tree, plus it regardless of anything else. Sure this would have resulted in this dog getting plussed for very likely having treed a possum but considering that it is such a rare situation and that in every other instance UKC says plus it, it would have been much better for our judges if Paul had just said plus this one too.
What do others think?
__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|