Doug Adams
Banned
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: mechanicsburg, Oh
Posts: 1184 |
Just wondering
I know a guy that has a male dog 4 years old. Doesn't do much but has treed a coon before. He has a all grand pedigree.
I was thinking the other day that since he is a male dog, that doesn't tree coon consistently you couldn't pay people to breed to him. Even though he is from a all grand litter, but If he was a female people wouldnt have any problem breeding even though everything about the dog is the same.
So my question is why does a male have to be consistent and have titles to be used for breeding but some people will use a female as a "brood" bitch without any ability or titles??
I don't think any dog should be bred strictly because of pedigree. It should be ability first and then pedigree etc. JMO
Not tryin to start a argument, just curious
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|