KJG
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Utica, Ohio
Posts: 66 |
Shawn, you've got some great points, as well as some of the other guys. Yea it may make it easier for some, but the system is made as a whole. Ukc cant chage, how some hunts may have fewer dogs than others, resulting in "what some call an easy win.". I've judged more than one final four, where it went down to a coin toss after two or three hours of running with no rabbits jumped. Its just the way it is sometimes. Yea maybe they could go to 2 firsts, that would probably prevent some of the easy ones. I think making a max point or having to win at different clubs is too difficult and way too much paper work to do. Like you said earlier, if people would stay on course to breed for performance and what they like, and not worry about the titles it would help too. Also comparing to AKC, they dont have grands, just FC, so they all run together. Also correct me if I'm wrong, aren't clubs that are AKC, limited to the amount of hunts that they have, I mean a smaller number than UKC. I think Albert touched on the subject of us having too many hunts, Maybe. dont know. I just believe that some numbers are down due to economy in such. We've had pretty much the same amount of hunts in Ohio for the last several years. I know this topic keeps coming. If your worried about if a certain dog is not worthy of being ch. then do some research before breeding to it, or if this dog is in your ch. cast. you should have nothing to worry about. JMO. Jeremy Geiger
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|