skyblu
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 4324 |
Here's what I said to the HB554 guy
I had already sent emails to legislators regarding SB1845. But I included it in my message just to broaden the outlook of Whitmire, Seliger & Committee on Criminal Justice.
Please oppose SB1845, an unfair spay/neuter bill with additional unrealistic requirements. It would unfairly penalize pet owners and effectively eliminates hunting, livestock and performance dogs in Texas.
Please oppose HB 1147 and SB 554. (Possession of alleged dog fighting equipment). Anyone who owns dogs could be prosecuted and dogs seized for having one or more of the following; harness, treadmill, cage, pen, doghouse, feeding apparatus. These are standard pieces of equipment for those engaged in such activities as hunting, dog sports and dog shows. While I support the prosecution of the crime of dogfighting, the language is vague and will result in people being falsely accused. In the vast majority of dogfighting cases, the dogs are destroyed prior to trial or even a conviction. Owners who are falsely accused suffer devastating financial and emotional losses and can never get their dogs back. Merely possessing this equipment does not mean that someone has the intent to train a dog to fight or that the equipment is used to the furtherance of dog fighting. Because someone has a dog bowl, does this mean they have the intent to fight a dog? This bill would open the door for unfairly prosecuting a person who legitimately owns American Pit Bull Terriers or other similar dogs.
The stated goals of HSUS are to eliminate ALL animals for use as clothing, food and entertainment. PETA and THLN are assisting this effort. The President of HSUS has stated he wants to eliminate all meat, fish, poultry, dairy and eggs from American menus.
Furthermore, HSUS/PETA/THLN are introducing bills to remove legal ownership of animals, making people “guardians” instead of “owners” so that when ANYONE claims disapproval of the way an animal is being cared for, that animal can be seized, even though the charges are false. The animals are usually euthanized, even before their owner is found to be innocent. These radical, well funded organizations do not operate any shelters, but collect funds from the uninformed, well intentioned public for lobbyists to further their goals and for their officers to live in lavish lifestyle. The many bills introduced by the radical “Animal Rights” (AR) groups are intended to undermine farming, ranching, dog shows, field trials, performance events, overall pet ownership and much more. Each AR legislative victory gives them “a foot in the door.” Often, legislators have no idea about the consequences of approving these bills that subvert the economy and turn innocent citizens into criminals because of unrealistic restrictions that are subject to broad interpretation.
Sonia Yearwood
A Voter in Center, Texas.
__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|