houndsound
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 1168 |
I'm so sick of everyone saying, "we should have fought the terrorists where they were, not in Iraq."
Come on.... terrorists aren't bound by political boundaries.... they are thick in the middle east... we all know that, they're in every country... Terrorist live in that region... they're primarily regional- not political, and they are most dangerous in countries whose governments are extremely anti U.S.- and the most dangerous one would be Iran. Now that dumb old George W. Bush "invaded" Iraq (which had terrorists) and "invaded Afghanistan" that dumb old Pres. now has a large military presence right in the heart of the region where terrorists come from, but that dumb old president also has a huge army on each side of Iran.... but that was probably just dumb luck... just like it's dumb luck that we've not been attacked since we entered the region.
Also, it's been raining here non-stop for two days and I've not been able to go coonhunting.... this is also probably George W. Bush's fault... I know if a dem. get's elected it'll be sunshine and most likely roses every day..... just look at what the dem. congress did to gas prices... we were told that gas prices were high just because George W. was in bed with big oil (never seen an ounce of evidence but none the less) I remember so many folks saying when the dem's get controll of the congress gas prices would go down.... But maybe they didn't lie in their minds as to many of them up is down and down is up so to them gas prices at 3.10 a gallon is down?????
dk
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|