UKC Forums Pages (6): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »
Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- But how many hunts did it take ???? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928419335)


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 06:59 AM:

But how many hunts did it take ????

How many other folks would like it if UKC could actually release specific information about a dog's hunt records ? Kinda like the offspring report. Hunts and hunt titles are a good thing but I think something like this would be nice. Here is an example of what I mean.


Dog A. - ( owner John Doe)
3 year old nite champion.
Hunt records :
total nite hunts entered before reaching nite ch. - 12
total # of different clubs entered in a hunt - 4
Wins came at clubs - Smithville and coonland.
Judges of each nite hunt win - Leroy , Earl, Jimbob,


Dog B. - ( owner Buster Brown )
3 year old nite champion.
Hunt records :
total nite hunts entered before reaching nite ch. - 40
total # of different clubs entered - 6
Wins came at clubs - Booneville.
Judges of each nite hunt win - Buster Brown.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 07:02 AM:

Say for instance your looking at two possible stud dogs for your female. You notice each stud dog has produced 5 grand nite champions each. How valuable would this tool be to you ? Pull up each grand nites hunt records. Think about it.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 07:15 AM:

For instance, you got two different stud dogs.

Stud dog A -
150 pups. 10 nite champs and 5 grand nites.

Stud dog B -
150 pups. - 10 nite champs and 5 grand nites.


You pull up the hunt records and you notice that for stud dog A, out of 15 titled dogs , 12 of those pups got every single win they got all at the exact same club. Also 10 of those titled dogs got every single hunt win they got with the very same judge. You dig deeper and then discover that nearly every single hunt win any of those pups got came at the same exact spot with the same exact handler and same exact guide. You then take another look at the hunt records and you find out many of those pups were entered in lots of hunts at other places around the state but never won anywhere except that same club. You check out stud dog B and you find totally different results.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by nitehunter2004 on 05-27-2015 08:06 AM:

Post the dates and states hunted and im all in.

__________________
T.Osborne..Homemade Kennels!
Home Of.
GrNtCh Hardwood Bean 11/28/03 - 4/14/14.
GrNtCh Big Money
GrNtCh North Mt Mort
GrChGrNtCh T&R’s Homemade Trouble

GrNtChGrCh Homemade Josie.
Homemade Tank.
GrNtCh Hardwood Bean (SEMEN)
GrNtCh Abbotts Bawling Rebel (SEMEN)
GrNtChGrCh Tj's Stylish Lipper (SEMEN)
GrNtCh Nite Life Pay Dirt (SEMEN)
GrNtCh PKC Ch Poison Smoke (SEMEN)


HomeMade Kennels
Newton N.C

2010 SETWA BREEDER OF THE YEAR!!
(828) 302-5480


Posted by DocAcumen on 05-27-2015 09:26 AM:

the idea is good! gives one looking to breed,a nice tool!

But , where are you going to get all that info from?
who would have the time to read and compile all that info?

Guess , and big way out there guess!!!! LOL
it could be done.....

But , think it would require every dog chipped? so as they would be scanned in at each hunt they went too? then scanned again at the end of hunt? so they could record..... dog , hunt . location , date , place ect...... even this would require some time, and money spent by clubs UKC ect....

that would work .... till ones found away to change the chip info..... and they would!!!!!


Lotta cash involved either way!

sure is a NICE thought though! sure could change the breeding i would think????


cool idea though!

maybe u can see what im talking about , or u cant? IDK

AKA..... It could happen!!!! But , what would the expense be???? Think it would be so much???? that you would be going farther in the direction that has made a decline in the hunts as it is now?

maybe i am wrong???? as i usually am!!!!

so tell me..... how could it be done on the cheap? so to keep small time guys keep showing up to hunts....

I will listen!!!! Sure be A LOT of DATA to be complied to do this.... At least I would think?


Posted by Greg Burks on 05-27-2015 11:13 AM:

All the info is on the score card..dog, handler, judge, guide etc. ...good idea I think


Posted by pamjohnson on 05-27-2015 01:39 PM:

it would hurt participation at the hunts. many people put a young dog in the hunts that isn't really ready for the hunts just to support the club. many times it will be the same fellow that is the guide and judge. they wont be there doing there part if it will affect there young dogs performance record.


Posted by pamjohnson on 05-27-2015 01:47 PM:

i also feel there would be handlers that couldn't handle not winning there cast and show some first rate poor sportsmanship.


Posted by RLenhart on 05-27-2015 02:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pamjohnson
i also feel there would be handlers that couldn't handle not winning there cast and show some first rate poor sportsmanship.

"Bingo" on both of your posts. It sounds good at first glance but what you said would be my to reasons for why not. I put a dog in hunts last year at just a little over a year old when I knew he wouldn't win allot but he seamed to handle it well and I just wanted to see him against competition. He got one 2nd place for the year. I wouldn't have been so inclined to hunt him early if everybody could see how many hunts i put him in.


Posted by HERSHSHUNTIN on 05-27-2015 03:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pamjohnson
it would hurt participation at the hunts. many people put a young dog in the hunts that isn't really ready for the hunts just to support the club. many times it will be the same fellow that is the guide and judge. they wont be there doing there part if it will affect there young dogs performance record.


I have to agree with this, I have a fellow up my way that always enters a young dog that has very little chance of winning the cast, he always guides and judges some of the time, good guy, I think he's foolish to enter some of those dogs tho. but we do need him to guide, he always puts you in coon and a safe place to hunt your dog.
Also on the number of hunts a dog is entered, it makes a difference on the size of the hunts to, we used to hunt 35-85 dogs at a local club, now if you get 12-20 you are doing well.
It also isn't just the dog, last I knew it was a TEAM of dog and HANDLER. lets face it some handlers can win with any old dog.--LOL

__________________
Herschel Burt

hershtwo@yahoo.com
Life member NRA
Current dogs
GR CH NT CH RED MIGHTY 90-Bo/Sierra
NT.CH.GR CH BEYOND BILLY HTX --Billy the Kid/ Amber
GR CH 1ST & 2ND place wins 90/4 LIFE GUN-HTX==-Willy BOY/Bigtime Britt
Dogs I have owned
Nt ch Gr ch HERSHS HUNTIN RED IKE
NT CH CH HERSHS HUNTIN BUDDY
GR NT CH MILLERS DIRTY RED
NT CH CH LYNN'S CREEK JULIE
GR CH HERSHS HUNTIN RED KATE
CH NITE CH AMBRAW RIVER TIMBER ROCK
NT CH HERSHS HUNTIN RED CLEM
NT CH ROCKY TOP CHERRY


Posted by Jeff Prince on 05-27-2015 04:28 PM:

You're also assuming that hunt title means good coondog. I learned years ago that just because a dog is a winner in the hunts don't mean the dog is something I
would hunt . Now days with low attendance hunt titles mean even less.

__________________
YOU CAN'T POLISH A TURD !


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 05:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Prince
You're also assuming that hunt title means good coondog. I learned years ago that just because a dog is a winner in the hunts don't mean the dog is something I
would hunt . Now days with low attendance hunt titles mean even less.



Believe me I totally understand that. Nite hunts are a good gauge but not the final say on a dog. Having hunt records like I mentioned would make it way way more relevant.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 05:39 PM:

It also isn't just the dog, last I knew it was a TEAM of dog and HANDLER. lets face it some handlers can win with any old dog.--LOL




But It should be just the dog. That's part of the benefits to having access to hunt records.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 05:45 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Greg Burks
All the info is on the score card..dog, handler, judge, guide etc. ...good idea I think


The more I think about it the better I like it.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by wrinkletreeknls on 05-27-2015 05:52 PM:

Score card wouldnt be accurate how many times does a score card not come back in

__________________
HOME OF:
'PR' SHAVER'S WRINKLE TREE BRUTUS
deceased

'PR' HAYES MOONLITE BO
deceased

'PR' SHAVER'S WEST FORK WRINKLES


Posted by dnold on 05-27-2015 05:53 PM:

hunt

Real good ideal I think it would make a Nt ch. mean more for some. Some of these Stud Dogs are being promoted. Have made hunts where there was one cast and three dogs at that. When a guy has a nice hound he would look for bigger hunts to put gr wins on his or her hound.

Say dog A was hunted at the small club hunts around his area. Made nitech. one cast of hounds done the same to grand.

Say dog B done the same to nitech Then went to the bigger hunts to put Gr.wins on his or her dog.

It would be nice to see ukc post these numbers.

I would look at Dog B a little harder.

__________________
Blue River Kennels.
Home Of GRNITE CH Blue River Ringo
2013 Top 100
2013 RQE 1st over all Pairs tx
High Scoring Dog At Red Bone Days Cuba Mo. 2013
Double Cast Winner At Zones In Queen City Tx. High Scoring Dog. 2013.
Danny Noltkamper # 580-920-5461


Posted by Bill(Chew) on 05-27-2015 06:05 PM:

It would cost the clubs a lot to send in the score cards to UKC. What would you do for the casts that don't return because they have no score? What about the guide that has no coon?

It would increase the paper work and cost to UKC to handle and store the increased information. To have the information of any value you would have to also include the # of dogs interred in the hunt, what were the complete scores, did the dog win his cast (if more than 10 places, frequent at big hunts), weather conditions, etc.

__________________
Bill Harper
Washington, NC
252-944-5592


Posted by Jason Baldwin on 05-27-2015 09:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bill(Chew)
It would cost the clubs a lot to send in the score cards to UKC. What would you do for the casts that don't return because they have no score? What about the guide that has no coon?

It would increase the paper work and cost to UKC to handle and store the increased information. To have the information of any value you would have to also include the # of dogs interred in the hunt, what were the complete scores, did the dog win his cast (if more than 10 places, frequent at big hunts), weather conditions, etc.



There are situations I would gladly pay money to find out details. I don't think I'm the only one either.

__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John3:16


Posted by GA DAWG on 05-27-2015 10:22 PM:

I doubt I ever care myself Aint like Im rushing out to breed to some ukc big winning dog. Id rather see a list of what their pups have been put in and won.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by shadinc on 05-27-2015 11:02 PM:

DocAcumen mentioned "every dog chipped". That's not a bad idea.


Posted by AngelOfDeath on 05-27-2015 11:52 PM:

Let me see if I understand what you all are saying.Since this is a dream or pipe dream lets make everything equal.Take two little mate brother's owned own by the same person and had the same handler.Take those two dogs and hunt them in the same hunts against the same dogs.I know there can't be two winners at a hunt but since this is a whatever you want to call it.For the sake of this crazy idea some of you have lets say you can.Dog A makes grand nite champion in 8 hunts.His little mate brother Dog B makes grand nite champion in 48 hunts.Then take both dogs and breed them to the same female at the same time.One of those dual sired litters.This way everything is still equal.Are you all saying that the pups from Dog A will turn out better then the pups from Dog B simply because it took him less hunts to make grand nite champion? That is what it sounds like to me you are saying.If so that is well kind of dumb logic.In case some of you forgot you don't get the stud dog when you breed you get what he reproduces.Using the logic behind this plan if I understand it right.You are saying oh lets use Rat Attack for a example.If he never won a hunt in his life but was still bred to the same females it sounds like you are implying his pups would never won all the money they did since he never won a hunt in his life.I could care less what the dog won or whatever I am more interested in how its pups did


Posted by elvis on 05-27-2015 11:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by DocAcumen

But , think it would require every dog chipped? so as they would be scanned in at each hunt they went too? then scanned again at the end of hunt? so they could record..... dog , hunt . location , date , place ect...... even this would require some time, and money spent by clubs UKC ect....



This may be a way to eliminate the same dog being hunted under different papers, provided the cast members verify the chip being read is the dog they hunted with.


Posted by Billy Beckham on 05-28-2015 12:12 AM:

Talk about information over load. Next we will want to know how many points, then its will be how many + or - points they had. UKC wont be able to do what you are talking about for free.

__________________
Billy Beckham
618-214-0065


PKC CH, GRNITECH Beckham's Hillbilly Bones


Posted by JiM on 05-28-2015 12:34 AM:

Coonhunters are really headed for the crapper. You want to choose a stud or pick a pup based on a computer printout? Crunch the numbers to determine what is a COONDOG and what isn't? Microchip imformation collection? Purty dam depressing.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by yadkintar on 05-28-2015 01:00 AM:

you can make a Grntch winning 8 straight 1st places against stiff competition and it's not going to make them reproduce any better they either got it or they don't simple as that !!


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM. Pages (6): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »
Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club