UKC Forums
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Walkers... How did we get here??? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928367427)


Posted by deschmidt27 on 03-16-2014 04:58 PM:

Walkers... How did we get here???

Ok, this is a real question in my mind, so I hope some people can hold back and keep it mostly serious!

I like most, have hunted with more good walker dogs than any other breed (not all are good, but more), and that's probably because there are quite simply way more Walkers out there, than any other breed. There's no denying the sheer number of them, as well as the number of World Champions, NtChs, GrNtChs, etc. but my question is how did that happen???

Were there just more English Walker Foxhounds available, way back when? Did other breed owners keep their dogs to themselves, or ask too much money for them, so Walkers became more prevalent? Is it because they were more high strung, and therefore more adept at competition, and that drove their popularity???

It's not because of the age of the breed, as there are much less prevalent breeds that have centuries on the Walker! And again, I'm not asking this out of bias or belief in some genetic superiority, as the finest coon dog I ever owned was a Bluetick-Cur mix!

So... anyone out there with more "seniority" or historical understanding than me, know how we came to have so many Walkers than anything else? I just don't believe it's as simple as, they were better so we bred more of them! There had to be something else.

A prime example that comes to mind, is that anyone that knows anything about video, knows that Sony's Beta format was far superior to VHS, but VHS was cheap and made more readily available and so it dominated the market until DVDs came along. Was it a similar situation with Walkers?

__________________
David Schmidt
219-614-0654


Posted by JiM on 03-16-2014 05:49 PM:

I don't carry any seniority and I'm no historian but from what I understand, there were other breeds such as the Plotts, B&T, Redbones And Blueticks that existed well ahead of the Walkers when they were first registered in '45. Into the 50's and 60's, the Walkers were not a leading breed in terms of numbers registered. And yet they quickly, in the space of a couple decades, managed to catch, pass and completely blow away all the other coonhound breeds in the UKC registration numbers. So the "why" of all that is a very good and legitimate question. My answer, for what it is worth, is this. They won, early on, right out of the box, with such dominance that coonhunters had to go out of their way to come up with reasons to try out or stick with the other breeds. And for those of the majority that had no specific breed allegiance, looking at the results of comp hunts left them with a " no brainer" response to choosing a dog. It quickly became a situation where you choose a Walker unless you just wanted to be different. I think the competition hunts were almost totally responsible for this because even tho pleasure hunters have hugely outnumbered comp hunters, the comp hunter have always seemed to hugely out influence the choice of breed. Those meat/ hide/ pleasure hunters may not give a hoot about nite hunts but they all want the best and seeing one breed come out of nowhere to totally dominate competition was just too much to shrug off. And I think that is what got us to where we are today. I think the overwhelming popularity of the Walker breed today is largely the fault of the nite hunts.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by john Duemmer on 03-16-2014 06:25 PM:

Which came first "the chicken or the egg"
Are there more walkers because they are better OR are they better because there are more.

I dont know, but once they became the breed of choice among the serious breeders and competitors in the sport they pulled away from the other breeds. The versatility of the different lines within the breed offers a somewhat predictable result that the other breeds cant offer.
No matter where in the country a guy lives,or what game he hunts, there is a line of walker dog that will get the job done.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside


Posted by micooner on 03-16-2014 06:27 PM:

If you look at any old pictures from the early 20's and up all you see are blueticks, B&T's, curs and mixed. The first registered treeing walker was in 1932, Lester Nance bought for $13 and two bags of pig supplement. The dog was from foxhound stock.

In the late 50's and early 60's walkers won the acha world hunts. One sold for $5000. As they say 'the rest is history"

The need for track driving speed with a actual coon at the end sealed the deal. Along with advertizing and great promotion. JMHO


Posted by markknepp on 03-16-2014 07:38 PM:

I've always wondered the same thing. I wonder how much of has to do with the color standards. Color seems to be a non factor for the most part. Seems like you could cross about anything with a walker and still end up with most of a litter that meets breed standards for a walker. Other breeds are limited by color and therefore the breeding pool is greatly reduced. As Long as it looks fairly houndy and has some white it looks like a walker. I've always wondered how much that had to do with it.


Posted by Ky Show Girl on 03-16-2014 07:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
I don't carry any seniority and I'm no historian but from what I understand, there were other breeds such as the Plotts, B&T, Redbones And Blueticks that existed well ahead of the Walkers when they were first registered in '45. Into the 50's and 60's, the Walkers were not a leading breed in terms of numbers registered. And yet they quickly, in the space of a couple decades, managed to catch, pass and completely blow away all the other coonhound breeds in the UKC registration numbers. So the "why" of all that is a very good and legitimate question. My answer, for what it is worth, is this. They won, early on, right out of the box, with such dominance that coonhunters had to go out of their way to come up with reasons to try out or stick with the other breeds. And for those of the majority that had no specific breed allegiance, looking at the results of comp hunts left them with a " no brainer" response to choosing a dog. It quickly became a situation where you choose a Walker unless you just wanted to be different. I think the competition hunts were almost totally responsible for this because even tho pleasure hunters have hugely outnumbered comp hunters, the comp hunter have always seemed to hugely out influence the choice of breed. Those meat/ hide/ pleasure hunters may not give a hoot about nite hunts but they all want the best and seeing one breed come out of nowhere to totally dominate competition was just too much to shrug off. And I think that is what got us to where we are today. I think the overwhelming popularity of the Walker breed today is largely the fault of the nite hunts.


i am with you Jim i have always heard 3 breeds split,maybe old lead had something to do with it put then what did they
bred back to?


Posted by JiM on 03-16-2014 10:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by john Duemmer
Which came first "the chicken or the egg"
Are there more walkers because they are better OR are they better because there are more.

I dont know..

I think that is answered. The breed was seen as better long before there were more of them. History shows, if you go back and look it up, that the Walker breed was dominating the hunts before they were the majority breed. So I think the answer is, there are more because they are better, not because there are more of them.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by Dirtdevil on 03-16-2014 11:19 PM:

My Granddad had foxhounds since he was young .. back as far as the 40's .... he always told me that those foxhounds that got older and fell out of the race to tree coon were the best coonhounds you could ask for and bred into coonhound lines .

I think that is what Lester Nance did .... while the other breeds even back then were breeding for color or ear or mouth ... some Walker men just bought their dogs off the tree , lol .... and built a foundation on that.

Although foxhounds are gaited , they are built to run tracks .. not just trail like the bloodhound based coondog breeds .... so that is also a factor .. those old Walkers were running dogs that also treed ... how can you compete with that unless you have some of it yourself.

That said , we can't use that as a crutch this many years later.... the off breeds just naturally attract pleasure hunters who value looks ,nose and a certain pedigree above nite hunts .... and why worry about hunt wins if you don't even hunt in them ?


Posted by john Duemmer on 03-16-2014 11:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
I think that is answered. The breed was seen as better long before there were more of them. History shows, if you go back and look it up, that the Walker breed was dominating the hunts before they were the majority breed. So I think the answer is, there are more because they are better, not because there are more of them.


I wonder what year UKC first registered more walkers than the other breeds? If i had to guess i would say probably in the 60s but it might be even further back than that.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside


Posted by Aaron R Gamble on 03-16-2014 11:31 PM:

If you look back pre spring creek rock I don't think they dominated like they do today he was what changed everything look at old pictures rock didn't look like a lot of the walker breed he was blanket back lot better looking than most hounds he was that dog that propelled the breed forward unknown a lot of people probably think i'm full of it but I grew up just a few miles from him my uncle hunted with him I know duane personally he the one who should get that's for pushing the breed to were it's at today


Posted by Larry Atherton on 03-17-2014 01:06 AM:

I think Dirtdevil was on the right track. Sorry about that.lol

I also believe it had to do with how a fox hound runs track. The older breeds were selected to track the few tracks slowly. Walkers ran their tracks with their heads up.

The difference is the coon populations increased. Between good running gear, running to catch, and an increase of available tracks made the walkers shine.

The walker numbers increased due to their success in the World Hunts and nite hunt success.

Then through the last several decades the older breeds started to select for faster track dogs.

That is my hypothesis.

__________________
Larry Atherton

Aim small miss small


Posted by Dan Dogs on 03-17-2014 01:29 AM:

I would say the big jump for the walkers was johnsons banjo. he thru some tree style in the running dogs.

__________________
Home of:
- Gr. Nite Ch. Iowa County Crybabe
- Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan
- Gr. CH Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan II
- CH. Gr. Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan III 2008 Performance Sire
- CH. Gr.Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan IV 2004 ukc world hunt finalist
- Ch. Gr.Nite Ch. Mounds Creek Sassy II
- Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Bucky HTX 3 wins towards grnite
- GrCh.GrNtCh Hickory Nut Bawlie HTX
-Nite ch. PR Iowa County CryBaby II 2013 Badger State Hunt Champion
qualified for 2013 UKC World Hunt
CH Nitech She Hate Me (scar) HTX Iowa County Kennels


Posted by msinc on 03-17-2014 01:57 AM:

I think a lot of factors combined to propel the Treeing Walker in popularity...mostly it was timing. No doubt the success of Walkers in competition hunts had a lot to do with it, but why didn't the other breeds get this popular back when they were winning???
When Walkers started to get popular, for the first time in America, people had a little spare money to play with. Communications thru media was getting better. There was a road system in this country and vehicles were being built for longer range travel.
Prior to these events I doubt too many guys found dogs advertised in another state halfway across the country and thought nothing of jumping in the 4wd pickup with a hunting buddy or two and taking a few days to go pick up a promising pup.
I would also bet that back then there just wasn't multiple coon hunters clubs having hunts in every state either, again because who could afford it??? All this came at a time when a coon hunter could afford and had the ways and means to try something different, something new.
No matter what reason or reasons you assign to the popularity of the Treeing Walker hound once they took off they were gone...and the other breeds will play hell catching them now!!!


Posted by JiM on 03-17-2014 02:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by msinc
I think a lot of factors combined to propel the Treeing Walker in popularity...mostly it was timing. No doubt the success of Walkers in competition hunts had a lot to do with it, but why didn't the other breeds get this popular back when they were winning???
Because they were all roughly equal before the Walkers took over. None of the other breeds could dominate on a consistent basis until the Walkers came along.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by chuck west on 03-17-2014 03:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by micooner
If you look at any old pictures from the early 20's and up all you see are blueticks, B&T's, curs and mixed. The first registered treeing walker was in 1932, Lester Nance bought for $13 and two bags of pig supplement. The dog was from foxhound stock.

In the late 50's and early 60's walkers won the acha world hunts. One sold for $5000. As they say 'the rest is history"

The need for track driving speed with a actual coon at the end sealed the deal. Along with advertizing and great promotion. JMHO



I have to agree alot with this post ,He mentions Lester Nance as he should . But I going to add a few names too ,John Shetler ,Glen Bixler , U.S. Ailing ,Raymond Motley ,Herb Carsten and Im not going to leave out John Monroe ,James Merchant and Joe House ,but I know I've left out some of the old breeders that made the Walkers what they are . And that's my 2 cents .

__________________
Gold Life member of G.P.A.A. #257936
Member of The Lost Dutchman's Mining Association #02890729


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:11 PM.
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club