![]() |
Show all 6 posts from this thread on one page |
UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- Democrat's in Control??? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928352349)
Democrat's in Control???
I read where Cities and States are filing Bankruptcy. I also read where they were Under Democratic Control. I've Tried to research this, But not finding too much. I'm sure some of you have better computer skills than I do. I plan to keep researching this issue!!
I think I found that Detroit has been under the Power Of A DEMOCRAT since 1970.
I was struck last week to hear that the city of San Bernardino, California is declaring bankruptcy. It follows similar moves in the past month by Mammoth Lakes and Stockton, also in California. Before them it was Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Jefferson County, Alabama, Central Falls, Rhode Island – the list continues.
What in the world is going on? Companies go bankrupt all the time – but what happens when a city goes under?
In reality, the two aren’t that different. Companies file for what’s known as “Chapter 11” – a provision which enables them to renegotiate deals, to downsize, to fire people. But filing Chapter 11 also gives them the option of liquidating – or breaking up. That would be essentially impossible for a city – it also happens to be unconstitutional. So cities go for “Chapter 9,” which covers municipalities: that’s cities, but also towns, villages, taxing districts and utilities.
641 cases of municipal bankruptcy have been filed since Chapter 9 was created. Most have been smaller cases involving utilities. But when an entire city goes bankrupt, things are much more complicated. It affects public sector jobs and vital services like fire and police departments.
Now, naturally, we assume all bankruptcies are a bad thing. They're humiliating, they impact business, they’re difficult to recover from. The situation is far from ideal. But it’s actually not without its benefits.
Take for example San Bernardino. It was running a $45 million deficit (on a $130 million budget.) But its creditors – workers and retirees – were unwilling to help out. The best the unions were able to do was to offer what they thought was a major concession: allowing newly-hired public safety workers to retire with 90 percent of their salary at the age of 55 – instead of 50, which had been the earlier deal!
That won't work in a chapter 9 bankruptcy. An independent judge brings all parties to a table where an agreement has to be reached – no matter how painful. And, we need some of those painful decisions – not just at the federal level, but at local and state levels as well. At its heart, the bankruptcies you keep hearing about these days aren’t about taxes being too low or spending on city services being too high – they're about pensions.
California's pension-related costs rose 20-fold in the decade since 1999. This frightening trend is true almost everywhere in America. And it’s simply not sustainable. A recent Pew research survey found that the gap between state assets and their obligations for public sector retirement benefits is $1.38 trillion. It rose by 9 percent in 2010 alone – and it will likely keep rising until these obligations are renegotiated.
The truth is America is sacrificing its future to pay for its past. To keep up with burgeoning pensions, states and cities are slashing services. It's also feeding into the unemployment problem. State and local governments have 445,000 fewer workers today than in 2007. Even if you exclude teachers from that number, we have 231,000 fewer workers.
For decades now, local governments have doled out patronage by increasing pension benefits – these costs impact the budget years later, when the officials who gave the benefits are safely retired themselves. We're now having to reckon with those choices.
I'm not saying bankruptcies are a good thing. But they are a mechanism that allows us to admit an emergency and renegotiate the deals that are, well, bankrupting the country.
Re: Democrat's in Control???
quote:
Originally posted by brushrunretiree
I read where Cities and States are filing Bankruptcy. I also read where they were Under Democratic Control. I've Tried to research this, But not finding too much. I'm sure some of you have better computer skills than I do. I plan to keep researching this issue!!
__________________
Gold Life member of G.P.A.A. #257936
Member of The Lost Dutchman's Mining Association #02890729
Thanks chuck, I didn't find any definitive info there. I'll keep digging.
A Business Insider article lists 17 different cities in America likely to face bankruptcy in the year 2011 if they don’t make drastic budget cuts. The cities are:
San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, New York City, San Jose, Cincinnati, Honolulu, Washington DC, Newark New Jersey, Detroit, Reading PA, Joliet, Camden New Jersey, Hamtramck Michigan, Central Falls Rhode Island and Paterson New Jersey.
Have you noticed the pattern yet?
Yes, they are all progressive liberal Democrat controlled cities! Most of which are in progressive liberal Democrat deep blue states. Ohio and Pennsylvania aren’t really deep blue states anymore, but California, New York, Illinois, Hawaii, Rhode Island and New Jersey sure are. Yes, I know New Jersey has a Republican governor, but that doesn’t change the fact that New Jersey is a deep blue state.
This is what I was looking for. Thanks
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 PM. | Show all 6 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club