UKC Forums - Sequestration

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 40 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- Sequestration (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928304660)

Posted by Cody Carroll on 02-26-2013 10:47 AM:

Sequestration

Well lets sure hope this doesn't happen. It will destroy the area I live in if it goes into effect. It's really funny how no one has been blaming the individual that actually signed this a couple years ago. If they would worry more about fixing our budget and other critical issues, and stop worrying about taking away our rights, then we would be fine. But I suppose you can't fix a budget that doesn't exist. I know if any of us didn't do the job we were supposed to, we would be fired. Why not them???

__________________
Cody Carroll
(757) 755-5820

proud member of the United States Navy Submarine Force

Former home of:
GRNITECH GRCH 'PR' Hardwood Ontime Abby

Posted by john Duemmer on 02-26-2013 12:32 PM:

Stop listening to the Libs. cry wolf about the sequester, it is not in reality even a cut. It is a 2% cut in the increase over the next 10 years.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside

Posted by trackdriver on 02-26-2013 12:53 PM:

Re: Sequestration

quote:
Originally posted by Cody Carroll
Well lets sure hope this doesn't happen. It will destroy the area I live in if it goes into effect. It's really funny how no one has been blaming the individual that actually signed this a couple years ago. If they would worry more about fixing our budget and other critical issues, and stop worrying about taking away our rights, then we would be fine. But I suppose you can't fix a budget that doesn't exist. I know if any of us didn't do the job we were supposed to, we would be fired. Why not them???

Posted by Lakeland Kennel on 02-26-2013 01:55 PM:

I think there will be a lot of voter unhappiness resulting in some big changes the next election. There are some Republican obstructionists that have to get re-elected fairly soon. Obama does not have to get re-elected. Who do you think is going to win in the long run?

Typical Republican short sightdedness.

__________________
Dave Haugh

LAKELAND KENNELS
____________________________
English Coonhounds
____________________________
Gr Ch Lakeland's Phoebe
PKC Sq Ch Lakeland's Mini Mouse
____________________________
Mt Curs
____________________________
Ch SqCh Lakeland's Lucy
SqCh Lakeland's Goldie
SqCh Lakeland's Kate
____________________________
Beagles
____________________________
Dual GrCh Blank's Midnight
GrCh HBCh Lakeland's Cricket II

_______________________________

Posted by STAGGCREEKFARM on 02-26-2013 02:26 PM:

Re: Re: Sequestration

quote:
Originally posted by trackdriver
x2

So obama should be fired for not producing a budget for 5 years?

Posted by STAGGCREEKFARM on 02-26-2013 02:47 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
[B]I There are some Republican obstructionists that have to get re-elected fairly soon.

What a hypocritical statement that is after all the cases of voter fraud on the demcratic side. Or, maybe your just stating the truth that most republicans are fairly elected and democrats will use any means necessary.

Why wouldn't the Democrats want voter id? It would eliminate some voter fraud. Oh, i answered my own question!

Posted by K. Singletary on 02-26-2013 03:50 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
I think there will be a lot of voter unhappiness resulting in some big changes the next election. There are some Republican obstructionists that have to get re-elected fairly soon. Obama does not have to get re-elected. Who do you think is going to win in the long run?

Typical Republican short sightdedness.

I think the short sightedness is to think we can spend our way out of debt without making any cuts. Guess what, if me or you run short on money we have to give something up in order to make ends meet. Our government needs to do the same. I'm not saying let the sequester happen, but serious cuts need to be made to get this spending under control and your party of choice seems unwilling to do this.

__________________
Kenny's Allnite Black and Tans
Moncks Corner, SC
843-697-5889
ChNtCh Allnite Gypsy Girl

Posted by headless01 on 02-26-2013 03:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by john Duemmer
Stop listening to the Libs. cry wolf about the sequester, it is not in reality even a cut. It is a 2% cut in the increase over the next 10 years.

Sir, you're wasting your time, its been programed in them for a long time.

Posted by StrawberryMt on 02-26-2013 05:41 PM:

Here's something for the right to explain away.
http://www.examiner.com/article/gop...illion-new-debt

__________________
your either making dust or your eating it
Travis Stirek
425-530-6649
http://stirekcanineservices.weebly.com

Posted by Diggerman on 02-26-2013 06:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by StrawberryMt
Here's something for the right to explain away.
http://www.examiner.com/article/gop...illion-new-debt

OK I wasted five minutes of my life reading this left wing propaganda.Basically says that after four years two months it is STILL BUSHES FAULT.It said nuttin about the lefts failure to pass a budget in four years,EVEN WHEN THEY CONTROLLED BOTH HOUSES AND THE PRESIDENCY.

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Posted by trackdriver on 02-26-2013 11:15 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Sequestration

quote:
Originally posted by STAGGCREEKFARM
So obama should be fired for not producing a budget for 5 years?

Are you sure about this? Do you mean on time? You might wanna do so reading before posting about a budget.

Posted by Cody Carroll on 02-26-2013 11:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by john Duemmer
Stop listening to the Libs. cry wolf about the sequester, it is not in reality even a cut. It is a 2% cut in the increase over the next 10 years.

It isn't a cut??? Wow. Could have fooled me. When we (the military) get told that we can't order parts to fix our gear to go on missions because the money isn't there, I'd consider that a cut. I'm glad your fine, but try telling the contractors and eventually the military when their pay gets cut to stop crying wolf. Some people actually have more interest in this than you think...

__________________
Cody Carroll
(757) 755-5820

proud member of the United States Navy Submarine Force

Former home of:
GRNITECH GRCH 'PR' Hardwood Ontime Abby

Posted by Diggerman on 02-26-2013 11:21 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Sequestration

quote:
Originally posted by trackdriver
Are you sure about this? Do you mean on time? You might wanna do so reading before posting about a budget.

I didn't snopes this BUT I am pretty sure Obama has NOT yet signed a budget dureing his presidency. I am also willing to bet he will not in his second term.I will also be willing to bet he is the first president in history not to sign a budget.

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Posted by rrs on 02-26-2013 11:30 PM:

The president submits a recommendation about budget to congress who has the real power to craft a budget that must pass both houses and than be submitted to the president to sign, it takes both to get anything done, revenue power belongs to congress, over time congress has given up much of its control of budget to the president creating the political games we now have, we need to cut spending period, but also have a steady fair revenue stream, all need to pay, personally believe the fair tax is the best option, but will never happen....

Posted by rance56 on 02-26-2013 11:42 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by StrawberryMt
Here's something for the right to explain away.
http://www.examiner.com/article/gop...illion-new-debt

Lol an to think y'all make fun of fox news. Do u really believe that garbage

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Posted by john Duemmer on 02-26-2013 11:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Cody Carroll
It isn't a cut??? Wow. Could have fooled me. When we (the military) get told that we can't order parts to fix our gear to go on missions because the money isn't there, I'd consider that a cut. I'm glad your fine, but try telling the contractors and eventually the military when their pay gets cut to stop crying wolf. Some people actually have more interest in this than you think...

You are one of two things. A victim of misinformation or a person who chooses not to find the truth.

The democratic propoganda machine is working overtime to scare everyone that has suggested that it might be time for some financial responsibility.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside

Posted by trackdriver on 02-27-2013 12:15 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Cody Carroll
It isn't a cut??? Wow. Could have fooled me. When we (the military) get told that we can't order parts to fix our gear to go on missions because the money isn't there, I'd consider that a cut. I'm glad your fine, but try telling the contractors and eventually the military when their pay gets cut to stop crying wolf. Some people actually have more interest in this than you think...

Yeah cody,it's no big deal but it's obama's fault if this thing kicks in. That's the message board collective's way of explaining things!!

Posted by skeets on 02-27-2013 12:32 AM:

if i aint mistaken, it was obama that came up with sequestration.lol

Posted by trackdriver on 02-27-2013 12:39 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by skeets
if i aint mistaken, it was obama that came up with sequestration.lol

Who voted on this? lol!!

Posted by skeets on 02-27-2013 12:45 AM:

the rep.and dem. voted on it,so i guess it was a great ideal.lollll

Posted by STAGGCREEKFARM on 02-27-2013 12:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by trackdriver
Yeah cody,it's no big deal but it's obama's fault if this thing kicks in. That's the message board collective's way of explaining things!!

The real question is who came up with the fiscal cliff and sequestration? I may be wrong but to me it sounds like a win/win for the demo's. They get to stand their ground on spending and if the repub's dont compromise then the country goes into economic distress. If that happens the republicans will get the blame.

Posted by Diggerman on 02-27-2013 01:08 AM:

What?

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Posted by Lee Stocking on 02-27-2013 01:11 AM:

I wish Obama would stop beating around the Bush.......

__________________
Tan
GRNTCH PKC CH Coble & Stocking's Troubadour (Troubles) or (Trubs)

NTCH PKCSilverCH Coble & Stocking's Swamp Rat Poison

NTCH Coble & Stocking's Stinger (GRNTCH Troubles x GRNTCH Fancy)

NTCH ACHA WReserve Team Troubles Trippy
Black & Tan

Posted by Diggerman on 02-27-2013 01:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lee Stocking
I wish Obama would stop beating around the Bush.......

This is almost as good as the blind pony.lol

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Posted by STAGGCREEKFARM on 02-27-2013 01:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by john Duemmer
Stop listening to the Libs. cry wolf about the sequester, it is not in reality even a cut. It is a 2% cut in the increase over the next 10 years.

Not so sure about that. Talked to friend of mine today. He is a federal prison worker. If sequestration isn't avoided, he will be laid of for 14 days without pay.

To me thats a great idea for the dem's. If the sequestration isn't avoided, people will loose their jobs and it will be the repub's fault. If a person has to choose to stick to their beliefs or the welfare of their family then you know what they are going to do. Dem's win.

The bad thing about this is that people will loose jobs, military will be cut, etc, but no reduction in peoples welfare, food stamps, unemployment, etc. Only take away from people that are contributing to society, not the ones that are only taking from it. Wouldn't want to upset the voter base that elected you

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 40 posts from this thread on one page