UKC Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- interview between USSA and Santorum (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=489021)


Posted by Cynthia on 03-08-2012 02:43 PM:

interview between USSA and Santorum

U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance
801 Kingsmill Parkway, Columbus, OH 43229
Ph. 614/888-4868 • Fax 614/888-0326
Website: www.ussportsmen.org • E-mail: info@ussportsmen.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Mike
Faw (614) 888-4868 x 214
March 7, 2012
Sharon Hayden (614) 888-4868 x 226

Santorum Provides Views on Sportsmen’s Issues

(Columbus, OH) –On the day before the pivotal “Super Tuesday” primaries,
former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum sat down for an interview with
the staff leadership of the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance to discuss issues
important to hunters, trappers and anglers.

The USSA staff present for the interview with Santorum were: Bud Pidgeon
(President and CEO); Rob Sexton (Senior Vice President); Doug Jeanneret
(Vice President, Marketing); and Evan Heusinkveld (Director, State
Services).

Here is the interview by issue topic:

Topic One: Hunting Recruitment and Hunting Access

Jeanneret: One of the issues facing sportsmen these days are dwindling
numbers of sportsmen. It’s a really big issue. The conservation
community, every national group… if you talked to any of them it’s a
concern of theirs. One of the things we would like to ask you, the
Department of Interior oversees U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which
oversees federal game laws. In your opinion, should they be helping us
create hunters, fishermen, trappers and promoting that ethic out there?

Santorum: I hear you but I am looking at where we are from the
standpoint from the deficit. I mean a lot of people ask me, where are
you for federal dollars for this or that? We are borrowing 42 cents of
every dollar right now and for me to commit any new dollars to do
anything would be a tough thing. If you are talking about within the
literature, for example that comes out, and we do things to talk about
hunting and fishing opportunities… if it’s in the context of what the
agency generally does and making sure that people are aware of
opportunities and things like that to sort of reinforce the importance
or nature of the sports. I have no problem with that. It’s different if
you’re saying we need to spend new dollars to do this.

Jeanneret: We’re not.

Sexton: We’re not. The pot of money we are talking about would be
excise tax dollars that come from ammunition sales, firearm sales,
fishing tackle sales. That money typically gets spent back on
conservation issues and sportsmen issues anyways. We are looking for
some prioritization of that money to programs that will get people into
the field and get them out and open up new land for them to hunt on and
things like that.

Santorum: I have no problem. I mean if you are asking me if I am going
to be friendly to opening up federal lands for more sportsmen activity
the answer is absolutely yes. If you are talking about if we are going
to take federal lands in the extent we can and turn them over to private
sector or turn them over to the state the answer is yes. I think this is
an opportunity for us. We have way too much federal land and way too
many restrictions on the federal lands that we have. I will be working
with a whole variety of different conservation groups, not environmental
groups, conservation groups as well as sportsmen groups to see what
avenues we can pursue to make that a much more welcoming environment for
sportsmen and for recreation.

Sexton: For years our community put our money towards reestablishing
species, whether it be deer or turkey or pheasant or what have you.
Returning to the idea of hunters, one of the biggest factors is the
urbanization of America. Guys give up hunting because they have to
drive 2½ hours to get to a place to hunt. I am just bringing this
around full circle so you know where we are coming from. We have used
our money… the firearm tax money and the fishing tackle money. That
money is supposed to be put back into the resource so that you get back
more hunters and anglers. Of course they (hunters) have a huge economic
impact as you know from your own home state. What we are looking for
now… we want to see investment in programs so that a guy doesn’t have to
drive 2 hours outside of Pittsburgh to get to hunt.

Santorum: I am okay with that as long as…you are going to find if you
look at my record one of the programs I am not a fan of is CRP. I know a
lot of CRP land is used for habitat but we shouldn’t be paying farmers
not to farm. I mean if you want to use that money to pay farmers to keep
habitat for pheasant, turkey, whatever…great, but I don’t think we
should be using money that encourages farmers not to farm their land for
environmental purposes. It’s not (CRP) as you know, it’s not intended
for wildlife habitat. It was intended for runoff and all sorts of other
things to preserve the ecology. I understand a lot of hunters and
sportsmen actually feel very passionate about the CRP program. I don’t.
Just being very up front with you. If you want to use the knowledge
for that, that’s one thing but we shouldn’t use __ag (agriculture)
dollars for that.

Topic Two: HR 4089, The Sportsmen’s Heritage Act of 2012

Heusinkveld: We have a piece of legislation we have been working on in
D.C. It’s called the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act of 2012. It’s a package
of four different pieces of legislation. It would close legal loopholes
that anti-hunters have used to shut down access to sportsmen to federal
lands. It has a provision, “open until closed,” which mandates that
these federal lands are open (to hunting, shooting, and fishing) until
closed by the agency because they’ve got specific reason or cause or
evidence that it needs to be done. The way the current law works, they
(federal land management agencies) have to open every single piece of
land. That opens up the opportunity to be sued by anti-hunters and
animal rights groups.

Santorum: I’m for it. (referring to supporting HR 4089)

Heusinkveld: Great.

Santorum: Government should make things available unless there is a
reason it shouldn’t be.

Topic Three: Dog Breeding and the Humane Society of the United States

Sexton: I think you are probably aware of a lot of the media coverage
over issues of substandard dog breeding operations. There has been a 50
state campaign to address the issue but the issue has gotten out of
control. The laws that are being written heavily impact folks who
aren’t large breeders, but operate sporting dog kennels, hobby breeders
instead of going after…

Santorum: …that’s actually why we thought about doing this at the
federal level so we could get all the folks and interested parties in
doing it. I mean you actually probably know I supported some of this
because of it was in conjunction with a problem we were having with the
importation of dogs and cats, but mostly dogs from China where there are
huge, huge problems with dogs, huge amount of dogs dying in
transportation and other types of problems and so that was clearly a
federal government issue because it has to do with trade so this was
sort of piggy backed on that bill. But it has been a chronic problem
for us in Pennsylvania too in the Amish areas. It became sort of a
wildfire issue for me and as far as I know they didn’t have this (state)
effort, which I understand they do now, to try and take care of this in
the 50 states. I know each state is dealing with it differently. But
if you look at that law we put together we were very, very conscious of
hobby breeders. We were very conscious of making sure we were talking
about large commercial operations, not somebody that was breeding a few
bitches you know every year or two.

Sexton: I think one of the concerns about the issue nationally is that
the chief proponent of the overall issue was the Humane Society of the
United States, who the hunting community regards as the top anti-hunting
group. The bills have been written in wide funnel methodology that
would… well in Pennsylvania the law they proposed would have put every
sporting dog kennel out of existence. We couldn’t find even one in
compliance with their proposal.

Santorum: I am not surprised by that. We dealt with both the AKC and
the HSUS. There were a lot of issues that ultimately would go back and
forth that we are not able to resolve and as a result probably just set
them aside. You know for me this was trying to do something that was
reasonable. I do believe in people’s ability to raise their own animals,
but I also believe when animals go into the home as most of these
animals do, you have to have consumer protection standards so you’re not
having defective animals and animals that have temper problems and other
types of problems coming into people’s homes. How many folks do you
know that their dog is like their child? You just can’t introduce an
animal into the home without having some sort of standards that are set
in place.

Sexton: Are you aware of the issues between the Humane Society of the
United States and the Sportsmen’s Community?

Santorum: Sure. I am very aware of it. I understand there are issues
between them (HSUS) and production agriculture which is even worse than
it is with the Humane Society and the sportsmen. I think you’ll find I
am very reasonable guy. I do believe we should be good stewards. We
have dominion over animals. We have dominion over the earth and we have
to be responsible for the treatment of them. I know most sportsmen are
but unfortunately there are some breeders who aren’t. As a result this
is the same thing as everything else when you have people that do not
live up to those conditions. Everyone else has to deal with regulations
as a result of that. You can’t just turn a blind eye to it. You can’t
just say well it’s too bad there are some bad people out there but too
bad. I just don’t think that’s what laws are for. People keep a
minimum standard for the care of and treatment of animals.

Sexton: You know you can draw a parallel when you think about it like
firearms regulations and laws. We are after law breakers, not the law
abiding and the same would be true on this issue.

Santorum: The concern is that we heard from some sportsmen groups and
breeders that government shouldn’t be involved with us at all. Well, I
don’t buy that. I mean you know if you want to police yourself…but
you’re not because I can point to lots of kennels where you’re not. So
if you’re not, someone is going to have to police it, otherwise you can
run the videos and show the American public and you’re going to lose
because no one is going to want to see animals treated like this and
hear the stories that are going on. I mean, Americans loves our pets so
we have to be reasonable. What I found is that vast majority of
breeders are very reasonable. Some who don’t believe in any government
regulation of anything and they have been out there speaking against me
as I have heard in some of the states, but my feeling is we need
responsible laws just make sure were hitting the irresponsible people
not the responsible ones.

***Editor’s Note: The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance is attempting to set up
interviews with the remaining presidential candidates. We will provide
information on their views on the most important issues to sportsmen as
it becomes available.

About USSA: The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance’s watchdog efforts protect
hunters’ rights and the interests of anglers, trappers and recreational
shooters in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress, and
through many public education programs. The USSA has more than 150,000
registered Sentries that regularly receive information about
conservation issues, and then they actively work to promote and protect
scientific conservation through calls and contacts. For more information
about the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance and the Sentry program, call (614)
888-4868 or visit www.ussportsmen.org.

__________________
2012 National Grand Show Champion, World Show Bluetick Female CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)
2012 Purina Show Bluetick Breed Winner GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Grt Balls o' Fire (Jerry Lee)
2013 World Champion Bluetick, 2013 AO Overall Bred By winner GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder)
2015 AO Overall Dual Champion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder/owner/handler)
2016 Grand American Overall Dual Ch, Overall Show CHampion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It


AKC CSG, UKC CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)
2010 National Grand Champion Bluetick
2013 AO Bluetick Stud Dog winner

CCH GCH 'PR' Southern Flame Elvira - the one that started it all

southernflamekennel@earthlink.net

RIP Southern Flame Elvira (the cornerstone of the kennel) 5/16/02-1/17/14

RIP Southern Flame Scarlet (the lone Redbone) 5/11/01-7/19/13

RIP Southern Flame Wild Irish Rose (Rosie) 6/15/09 - 3/12/15

RIP Southern Flame Too Hot to Trot (Bonnie) 3/27/07 - 4/20/15

RIP Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)

RIP Southern Flame Triple Trouble (TT) 12/17/04 - 11/19/16

RIP Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)

RIP AdeleMay's a Smokey Bandit (Adele)

RIP Southern Flame I Like Ike (Ike)

RIP Bella the Beagle

Bear, Jerry Lee, Camo, Maybellene, Lacy, Thor, Sissy, Merle, Tina, Bridgette - the Blueticks, Hollie - the Aussie


Posted by K. Singletary on 03-08-2012 02:59 PM:

He's no friend of ours for sure....

__________________
Kenny's Allnite Black and Tans
Moncks Corner, SC
843-697-5889
ChNtCh Allnite Gypsy Girl


Posted by RHK on 03-08-2012 05:13 PM:

the man did a fine job in that interview. these are tiny little issues that are a simple drop in the bucket. i bet $1000 thats not the whole interview. its a cut-out designed to make him look as bad as possible, which it didnt even do that.


Posted by K. Singletary on 03-08-2012 05:42 PM:

The man pushed for the PAWS bill that was not supported by UKC or PKC. That's what the questions are referring to and from the way he answered the questions it sounds like he would still support similiar legislation today.

__________________
Kenny's Allnite Black and Tans
Moncks Corner, SC
843-697-5889
ChNtCh Allnite Gypsy Girl


Posted by Cynthia on 03-08-2012 05:54 PM:

I copied it straight as is from a mailing list Im on. whether they did the same thing I dont know.

__________________
2012 National Grand Show Champion, World Show Bluetick Female CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)
2012 Purina Show Bluetick Breed Winner GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Grt Balls o' Fire (Jerry Lee)
2013 World Champion Bluetick, 2013 AO Overall Bred By winner GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder)
2015 AO Overall Dual Champion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder/owner/handler)
2016 Grand American Overall Dual Ch, Overall Show CHampion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It


AKC CSG, UKC CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)
2010 National Grand Champion Bluetick
2013 AO Bluetick Stud Dog winner

CCH GCH 'PR' Southern Flame Elvira - the one that started it all

southernflamekennel@earthlink.net

RIP Southern Flame Elvira (the cornerstone of the kennel) 5/16/02-1/17/14

RIP Southern Flame Scarlet (the lone Redbone) 5/11/01-7/19/13

RIP Southern Flame Wild Irish Rose (Rosie) 6/15/09 - 3/12/15

RIP Southern Flame Too Hot to Trot (Bonnie) 3/27/07 - 4/20/15

RIP Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)

RIP Southern Flame Triple Trouble (TT) 12/17/04 - 11/19/16

RIP Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)

RIP AdeleMay's a Smokey Bandit (Adele)

RIP Southern Flame I Like Ike (Ike)

RIP Bella the Beagle

Bear, Jerry Lee, Camo, Maybellene, Lacy, Thor, Sissy, Merle, Tina, Bridgette - the Blueticks, Hollie - the Aussie


Posted by Southbound on 03-08-2012 06:05 PM:

Santorum's basic premise is that everything should be regulated, because people cannot be trusted with anything.

Just another big government liberal hiding out in the Republican party.

I'm not saying he is a bad person; he just has very faulty ideas about the role of government in a free society.

__________________
David Kadle
256-689-0174
davidkadle@gmail.com


Posted by RHK on 03-08-2012 06:54 PM:

hes the best we got. more conservative than romney, more moral than newt. paul doesnt have a chance. he is better than any other alternative out there. but yes, the republican party has let me down.


Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 03-08-2012 07:13 PM:

TWO HOME RUNS AND A GROUND BALL TO SHORT, THATS A 600+ AVERAGE, HALL OF FAME NUMBERS, IF HE CAN MAINTAIN THAT CONSISTANTLY, HE'S WORTH HAVING ON THE TEAM!!!


Posted by willseeyalater on 03-08-2012 07:17 PM:

Show me which of the Republican candidates will answer questions as straight up like Santorum does? Romknee would say he knows some rich people who own dogs and therefore he likes dogs. Newt would tell you stories about dogs he used to have but walked away from for a new one then warn you not to believe everything his former dogs say about him. Ron Paul would say that dogs should be free to run their own lives and not be involved in foreign entanglements. Then our POTUS has a dog but there is no proof that his dog was born in the USA or even understands english and he has no explanation as to why his dog lays down on a rug five times a day facing the east.


Posted by RHK on 03-08-2012 07:26 PM:

i really didnt think it was that bad either. im not sure what the correct answer was on all 3 but i think he was as close as a person can honestly get.


Posted by goodtimekennel on 03-08-2012 08:03 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by RHK
i really didnt think it was that bad either. im not sure what the correct answer was on all 3 but i think he was as close as a person can honestly get.


AGREED THOUGHT HE DID GOOD COVERED HIS BUTT A LITTLE BUT ALL IN ALL IF YOU THINK WE ARE EVER GONNA HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO STANDS UP FOR HUNTERS AS MUCH AS HE DOES,?

__________________
MERLE COBLENTZ
937-313-2880 CELL
CALL TEXT VOXER
HOME OF GOODTIME KENNEL
WHERE WE SHOW ON THE HARDWOOD


Posted by Ryan1988 on 03-08-2012 08:34 PM:

I like what him! There is not one that will tell it as straight as he does!

__________________
Ryan Crow


Posted by Bill Lash on 03-09-2012 01:30 AM:

Santorum

This guy crossed the people that elected him with his animal rights stance on dogs, he got run out of town by a landslide by the ultra conservative people that had re-elected him, there was a grassroots movement by his former supporters to get him out and that is exactly what happened. He will not win the Amish over for his bid for president , these are the people that he needs here in the democratic state of Penna.They simply will not trust him, believe me a lot of the Amish vote,along with a lot of dog owners. If he wins the primary here in pa. i will be shocked.

__________________
bill lash


Posted by Pat Bizich on 03-09-2012 01:39 AM:

I am with you Bill.He can fool people from other states that don't know him but he can't fool the people from his home state.He got beat here when running for office.

__________________
IT SEEMS THAT EVERYTIME A BREED OR LINE OF DOGS GET POPULAR IT EVENTUALLY LEADS TO ITS RUINATION BY UNINFORMED PEOPLE BREEDING WITHOUT DOING THEIR RESEARCH FIRST.

Gone but never forgotten:
NtChGrCh Dryfork Punkin
NtChGrCh Dryfork Little Blue Baby Doll
2009 Pa Show Dog Of The Year
GrCh Dryfork Little Black Book
Gr.Ch. Make My Day Sunny
Gone too soon RIP my baby girl
Gr.Ch. Black Dog Black Cherry
GrCh Dryfork Black Dog Raine
One of kind and would make a believer out of you when you thought there were no coon left
Home of:
2009,2013,2018 Pa. State
Show Handler Of The Year
CH. Power Pack Pepper
2018 Pa. Show Dog Of Year
Gr.Ch. Batman's Poison Ivy
2011&2013 WTDA Pa State Champion
2011&2013 Overall Hunt For The Cure
Ch. Jay's Greenridge Heidi
In memory of my best friend "Jay"


Posted by ncplotts on 03-09-2012 03:16 AM:

If it comes down to Santorum vs Obama...I'll vote Santorum,but only because he is the least of the evils.....I'll write in Donald Duck again before I vote for Romney,Gingrich or Obama. Basically we're screwed for another 4 yrs at least.......

__________________
North Country Plotts


Posted by mike sheridan on 03-09-2012 03:52 AM:

We wont get a perfect candidate on the ballot but whoever it is cant be any worse than obama we know that for sure!


Posted by l.lyle on 03-09-2012 04:38 AM:

I am surprised he is as knowledgeable about CRP, Agriculture, and our CRP issues as he is. And he recongizes the difference in Conservation and environmentalism. I am dissappointed at his stance on 'police state' regulation. USSA did a good job . I wish they had approached kennel policing from a private property search and seizure without a warrent aspect.

Thanks for posting and post the other candidates interviews.


Posted by goodtimekennel on 03-09-2012 05:38 AM:

Re: Santorum

quote:
Originally posted by Bill Lash
This guy crossed the people that elected him with his animal rights stance on dogs, he got run out of town by a landslide by the ultra conservative people that had re-elected him, there was a grassroots movement by his former supporters to get him out and that is exactly what happened. He will not win the Amish over for his bid for president , these are the people that he needs here in the democratic state of Penna.They simply will not trust him, believe me a lot of the Amish vote,along with a lot of dog owners. If he wins the primary here in pa. i will be shocked.


first thing you need to no 95% if not 100% of Amish people do not vote in public elections.
I will vote for any gop candidate over the radical thing we have now

__________________
MERLE COBLENTZ
937-313-2880 CELL
CALL TEXT VOXER
HOME OF GOODTIME KENNEL
WHERE WE SHOW ON THE HARDWOOD


Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 03-09-2012 05:46 AM:

I'M PRETTY SURE THERE WON'T BE ANY AMISH SWAYED BY THE PROMISES OF FREE CONTRACEPTION EITHER!!!


Posted by truly on 03-09-2012 06:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by willseeyalater
Show me which of the Republican candidates will answer questions as straight up like Santorum does? Romknee would say he knows some rich people who own dogs and therefore he likes dogs. Newt would tell you stories about dogs he used to have but walked away from for a new one then warn you not to believe everything his former dogs say about him. Ron Paul would say that dogs should be free to run their own lives and not be involved in foreign entanglements. Then our POTUS has a dog but there is no proof that his dog was born in the USA or even understands english and he has no explanation as to why his dog lays down on a rug five times a day facing the east.
I wish this site gave us the chance to "rec" posts that we like. maybe a "good 'un" button for this!
Add- Hilary would say her husband was a dog so she was fairly sure she could be too!

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by john nannemann on 03-09-2012 01:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by l.lyle
I am surprised he is as knowledgeable about CRP, Agriculture, and our CRP issues as he is. And he recongizes the difference in Conservation and environmentalism. I am dissappointed at his stance on 'police state' regulation. USSA did a good job . I wish they had approached kennel policing from a private property search and seizure without a warrent aspect.

Thanks for posting and post the other candidates interviews.




lmfao- dude, you do hate that nosy dog catcher, don't you?

__________________
"it's easy to sit there and say you'd like to have more money. and i guess that's what i like about it. it's easy. just sitting there, rocking back and forth, wanting that money."
Jack Handy


Posted by willseeyalater on 03-09-2012 02:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
I wish this site gave us the chance to "rec" posts that we like. maybe a "good 'un" button for this!
Add- Hilary would say her husband was a dog so she was fairly sure she could be too!



Careful Truly, as much of a thinker as you are I might get tarred and feathered by association on here if you think I had something to say. LOL yeah, I forgot Hillary and she did have a dog who was a "go yonder" Arkansas Traveler. I think she had him neutered and he has since had a lot less hunt in him. He wasn't very tree minded but he could find a female in heat.


Posted by dbprofitt56 on 03-09-2012 02:49 PM:

Just remember, a no vote for any Republican, conservative, or moderate, is basically a vote for Obama! We don`t have a perfect candidate, but the dog catcher would be better than the guy trying to rule over us now!

__________________
From the great philosipher, Ron White...."You can`t fix stupid"
The 9 most terrifying words " I`m from the government, and I`m here to help".....Ronald Reagan
"If the government was in charge of the Sahara Desert, it would be out of sand in 5 years"......Thomas Friedman


Posted by Bill Lash on 03-09-2012 10:59 PM:

Santorum

Mr.Coblentz, I would like you to know that the Amish in our neck of the woods are involved in politics and yes they do vote, I did not post this to get into a p!ssing match over politics, just to state the facts,as to why Mr. Santorum lost his re-election here in his home state. I share the same fears on a repeat 4 years,it is a shame we don't have someone worth while to put up against him.

__________________
bill lash


Posted by RHK on 03-09-2012 11:12 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by willseeyalater
Careful Truly, as much of a thinker as you are I might get tarred and feathered by association on here if you think I had something to say. LOL yeah, I forgot Hillary and she did have a dog who was a "go yonder" Arkansas Traveler. I think she had him neutered and he has since had a lot less hunt in him. He wasn't very tree minded but he could find a female in heat.


THATS TRUE!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club