UKC Forums
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Bench Show Question - What's Worse? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=254323)


Posted by Reds4Me on 02-03-2009 12:29 AM:

Bench Show Question - What's Worse?

What is worse for a bench show dog - knuckled over in the wrist or behind 90 degree angle in the pastern?


Posted by Lee Currens Jr. on 02-03-2009 01:05 AM:

hmm i always thought it said straight on the front legs
no mention of pastern.i guess take a protactor 90 would
be a direct angle i have person never seen one


Posted by Reds4Me on 02-03-2009 02:50 AM:

I would consider it similar to horses - over in the knee or behind in the knee. The angles are different for each, each has an impact on shock absorption. But I have seen both occur in dogs, just wondering which is worse.


Posted by Lee Currens Jr. on 02-03-2009 03:01 AM:

you are making up stuff to suit you the breed standers
for dogs says straight.i dont care about horses,rabbits
or pigs.


Posted by Dale Young on 02-03-2009 03:10 AM:

I'm not a technical person and really haven't a clue as to which is worst for the dogs get up and go, which should really be the point of the question. However since you asked about on the bench I'd have to say whichever is the most obvious in appearance will cost you the show. Some things jump out at you and others aren't apparent to everybody.


Posted by Lee Currens Jr. on 02-03-2009 04:06 AM:

guess it would depend on going up hill or down hill which
1 i would ride.lol


Posted by Reds4Me on 02-03-2009 10:12 PM:

Thanks Dale. I was just curious on how this particular issue is judged/viewed by a bench show judge and appreciate your feedback. I hope to obtain my judge license sometime in the future and this was a question I've always had. You don't see either very much in the larger bench shows, but some of the local ones I've been to have dogs with 'odd' front legs and joint angles.


Posted by skyblu on 02-04-2009 12:59 AM:

When judging

Remember to look at the WHOLE dog for balance, proportion and adherence to the breed standard. Someimes too much attention is paid to one small but obvious fault instead of considering how well the total dog is put together for FUNCTIONALITY.

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by ladycoonhuntr on 02-04-2009 01:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Reds4Me
I would consider it similar to horses - over in the knee or behind in the knee. The angles are different for each, each has an impact on shock absorption. But I have seen both occur in dogs, just wondering which is worse.


personally i would say the 90 on the pasterns. I saw a young dog like this one time. I swear if it had been a horse it would have been put down, would have NEVER carried any weight.


BUT i agree totally with Skyblu. You have to keep the written standard in mind as well as how the overall dog is put together.
Also remember that when judging diff breeds at the same time you are NOT judging them AGINST eachother. It is the one that best fits ITS PARTICULAR STANDARD.

__________________
Steele Farm Aussies and Hounds

CH Hayseed's Sweet Talkin Sadie
Steele Farm Marly
Steele Farm Tucker

PR Mitchell's Whiskey In a Jar
May 14,2006 - Feb 13,2010


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club