UKC Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Babbling Rule and Stationary Rule (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928525166)


Posted by Rocketman55 on 12-14-2019 06:16 PM:

Babbling Rule and Stationary Rule

Well after reading the upcoming Babbling rule I can see it is another area within the rules where you as a handler loose the right to call your dog. Your dog will now be scored by what a majority of the cast thinks it is doing rather than what YOU the handler (who knows the dog) (in most cases) better than anyone else in the cast. thinks it is doing. This rule will be used to either get you to take minus, or to delete your strike points, and in either case it will be done to get the dog to loose the points placed on the score card.

This also happened with the injection of the Stationary rule where the judge ( who probably doesn't know your dog) determines when your dog is treeing satisfactorily, and applies a rule in an effort to get you to take minus.

Sorry to offend so many of you but what in the !@#$%^&* are you thinking!!!!

It looks to me like this competition game is headed toward placing all dogs on one Garmin system, put that system on Bark Detection mode for all collars, put that up on the big screen for all handlers to see, and then let the Garmin determine which dog opens first and which dog trees first and write their scores on the card according to how they were recorded on the Garmin. I think in the long run you will get a more fair and honest reflection of how your dog scored on that particular night.

Sorry adjustment to the rules IN MY OPINION!!!!!!!


That will make it more to the video game many seem to be pushing for.

__________________
Phone-740-767-2572
Dave Mayles
11210 Davis Road
Glouster, Ohio 45732
Home To:
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Hang'em High Holly
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Rockets Top Gun.
Gr.Nt.Ch.Hooper Ridge Rocket
Gr.Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Dolly
Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Queen
Nt.Ch Raw Dawg Rowdy
PR Tree Banging Buddy
HOOPER RIDGE ENGLISH-POUND FOR POUND THEY ARE ONE TOUGH HOUND!!!!


Posted by benderb4 on 12-14-2019 07:08 PM:

Re: Babbling Rule and Stationary Rule

quote:
Originally posted by Rocketman55
Well after reading the upcoming Babbling rule I can see it is another area within the rules where you as a handler loose the right to call your dog. Your dog will now be scored by what a majority of the cast thinks it is doing rather than what YOU the handler (who knows the dog) (in most cases) better than anyone else in the cast. thinks it is doing. This rule will be used to either get you to take minus, or to delete your strike points, and in either case it will be done to get the dog to loose the points placed on the score card.

This also happened with the injection of the Stationary rule where the judge ( who probably doesn't know your dog) determines when your dog is treeing satisfactorily, and applies a rule in an effort to get you to take minus.

Sorry adjustment to the rules IN MY OPINION!!!!!!!



This is copied and pasted from a quote on another answer.
' "Speculation" and "obvious" are, by definition, two very different words that have been used in debate as it relates to dogs running deer or fighting without actually seeing it. One is; rumor, gossip, assumption, guesswork, supposition, hearsay. The other is; clear, apparent, evident, recognizable, observable._

Myself, I'd never scratch a dog for running deer or fighting based on speculation._

so why would you be allowed to minus or delete a dogs strike points because you speculate ,guess,or assume, based on this quote from another thread it must be obvious ,clear, apparent, ?

I don't understand?
If we think a dog is running deer unless we see it we can't minus it.Not assumption or speculate.Because it's not fair.
If we think 2 dogs were fighting we must see it to scratch them.Not assumption or speculate.Because it's not fair.
If we think a dog is babbling we can minus it cause we think it is without any proof it actually babbled ?Isn't that assumption and speculation? But this is fair and okay?

__________________
NOW THE LUNATICS ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM IN WASHINGTON,DC.
MY SILENCE DOES NOT MEAN I AGREE WITH YOU...IT MEANS YOUR LEVEL OF STUPIDITY RENDERS ME SPEECHLESS
I AM NOT ARGUING WITH YOU..I AM JUST TRYING TO EXPLAIN WHY I AM RIGHT
TRUTH IS TREASON IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES...G. Orwell
DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU...G. Carlin
ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE WORK RELENTLESSLY TO CENSOR THOSE WHO SPEAK THE TRUTH...Ron DeSantis


Posted by Sgraves on 12-14-2019 09:53 PM:

An honest strick dog doesn’t stand a chance. The babbler is not going anywhere. Dogs now days make babbling look to good. The ones hunting them will never be man enough to say they are hunting one. Strick points are as useless nowadays, don’t mean chit anymore. I say we all hunt a babbler, have a first strick calling contest before we cut them loose. An whichever dog trees the most coon wins. The stricking in part of a dog in these hunts is a joke.


Posted by Sgraves on 12-14-2019 10:12 PM:

I have a question for the ones who are hunting a babbler an calls it a track dog . During all that barking that your dog does , do you actually know when it strikes a legit coon track. Or does it really matter, as long as your toting first strick. Quite a few people says a silent mouth dog should be against the rules. But I say any type dog that runs through the country looking for a hot pop up is know different than the other. The only difference is the babbler gets first strick an the other gets what’s left. If your serious about the competition side of it , then why not have a dog that gets its mouth open quick. Honest or not.Its more about what we can win than worrying about what makes a real coon dog anyways.


Posted by randywoodard2 on 12-14-2019 10:36 PM:

Hunts

Dont think it really matter anyhow, last dog i titled out i would strike my dog and then another handler would holler strike his dog! Buddy system at its best. Theyd be like sorry he got it!! Hunts have always been a joke. Only thing u can do is hope your dog can slip off and get one , so until grown men start acting like thier grown and call the dogs for what they do its always gonna be like this

__________________
GR.NT.CH WOODARDS ALLGRAND SPIDERMAN R.I.P
GR.NT.CH WOODARDS ALLGRAND BATMAN R.I.p
Pr. Woodards Hardwood Doc
Pr.Woodards Late Night Trix


Posted by 2ol2hunt on 12-14-2019 11:06 PM:

Don't be that way Randy!!! Lol 😂


Posted by yadkintar on 12-14-2019 11:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by 2ol2hunt
Don't be that way Randy!!! Lol 😂



I have learned to like last strike lol.


Tar


Posted by 2ol2hunt on 12-15-2019 12:04 AM:

The BOOK says"the first shall be last and the last shall be first"..... I'm just saying... lol 😂


Posted by Sgraves on 12-15-2019 12:36 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by 2ol2hunt
The BOOK says"the first shall be last and the last shall be first"..... I'm just saying... lol 😂
The truth will have the final say so.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 12-15-2019 01:26 AM:

...And the truth shall set you free.


Posted by shadinc on 12-15-2019 02:12 AM:

Don't forget, "The squeaking wheel gets the grease."

__________________
Donald Bergeron


Posted by novicane65 on 12-15-2019 05:19 AM:

Take it for it this is worth to ya......

If your dog gets 100 strike off the snap +90% of its casts chances are a babbler. Sorry if the shoe fits.

I've owned this type, they can get you in the winners circle but I can't stand to "pleasure" hunt one though. I'll stick with the honest strike dogs.

Just more of the sky is falling again.

__________________
Eric DePue
Hill Country Kennels Itty-Bitty
PKC CH Wax's Late Night Boom
And
Partners on a few common trashy young dogs

Gone but not forgotten

GrNtCh, PKC Ch Hillbilly Bildo
Pr Broken Oaks Wild Blue Gypsy


Posted by Richard Lambert on 12-15-2019 01:44 PM:

Eric, are you saying that they are winners but not pleasure hounds?


Posted by novicane65 on 12-15-2019 11:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Eric, are you saying that they are winners but not pleasure hounds?


Sometimes.......
I don't find any pleasure hunting them. But if the dog gets its mouth open and parks under a coon 6/10 times, it will win 75% or better of its casts. But the trick is to be able to hunt that style and like them enough to keep hunting them.

P.S.
I can name a bunch of dogs that are this type. But I'll refrain from doing so.

__________________
Eric DePue
Hill Country Kennels Itty-Bitty
PKC CH Wax's Late Night Boom
And
Partners on a few common trashy young dogs

Gone but not forgotten

GrNtCh, PKC Ch Hillbilly Bildo
Pr Broken Oaks Wild Blue Gypsy


Posted by DJames on 12-16-2019 12:02 AM:

I have always hunted honest strike dogs and accurate treedogs and have won a fair share of hunts but if i never win another hunt it wont change the type of dogs that i try to breed, raise and hunt.

__________________
David James
Tough English Kennels
731 307 8144

GrNtCh HOF GrCh Tough Red Ruby Big Rig

GrNiteCh PR James' Tough Blue Glass Performance Sire 2009 World Qualifier

GrNiteCh PR James' Tough Blue Tank
GrNiteCh PR James' Tough Glass Shaker 9th place St Jude Saturday nite hunt 2013
NiteCh PR James' Tough Blue Shine (RIP)
NiteCh PR Tough Blue Lady (Sold)
NiteCh PR Tough Blue Rebel (Sold)


Posted by Rocketman55 on 12-16-2019 04:20 AM:

if i never win another hunt it wont change the type of dogs that i try to breed, rais

David I whole heartedly agree with you. If I continue to get misused or deleted because my dog opens on a colder track than the majority in a cast, I will simple continue to breed the style dog I like but what I may do differently than you is I may have to find a registry that doesn't penalize an open trailing hound for striking a track the other two or three silent trailers won't open on. The jury is out (for me) till after the $200,000.00 hunt has been finalized and we see how these new rules are utilized when the money is on the line so to speak. I'm betting they won't be utilizing hunting judges in that scenario, like the majority will have to hunt by using the new 2020 rules.

But if they really want to test the integrity of this new rule change, they will allow hunting judges even in the finals. Then the big money men and/or women that played a role in implementing these new babbling rules will find out just how easily a cast can and will be manipulated when the game is on the line.

JMO But hey This is STILL America isn't it??

__________________
Phone-740-767-2572
Dave Mayles
11210 Davis Road
Glouster, Ohio 45732
Home To:
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Hang'em High Holly
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Rockets Top Gun.
Gr.Nt.Ch.Hooper Ridge Rocket
Gr.Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Dolly
Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Queen
Nt.Ch Raw Dawg Rowdy
PR Tree Banging Buddy
HOOPER RIDGE ENGLISH-POUND FOR POUND THEY ARE ONE TOUGH HOUND!!!!


Posted by G.W. Harring on 12-16-2019 06:12 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Sgraves
.......The stricking in part of a dog in these hunts is a joke.
.......Its more about what we can win than worrying about what makes a real coon dog anyways.


I agree.

As long as the rules of the competition give an advantage in points to a dog for opening first......you will ALWAYS have loose mouthed babblers being entered in that competition attempting to gain that advantage.

Treeing the most coon in a set amount of time with the least amount of mistakes should be the goal.

Barking 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th on ??? isn't even on my list when judging how good a coonhound is anyway.

Buuuut that's just my opinion and if someone else wants to feed a babbler...giddy up. Just call it what it is and don't try telling me what a cooold nosed dog you have. LOL

__________________
CORNERSTONE TREEING WALKERS
Greg & Marcia Harring
Syracuse, Nebraska
402-209-5053


Posted by novicane65 on 12-16-2019 12:25 PM:

Buuuut that's just my opinion and if someone else wants to feed a babbler...giddy up. Just call it what it is and don't try telling me what a cooold nosed dog you have. LOL [/B][/QUOTE]

This is exactly right. And if you talk to any of the owners this is exactly what is said almost verbatim. I'm not saying I've hunted or seen the coldest trailing dogs. But it's obvious when your turdeater gets first strike every turn out off the snap.

__________________
Eric DePue
Hill Country Kennels Itty-Bitty
PKC CH Wax's Late Night Boom
And
Partners on a few common trashy young dogs

Gone but not forgotten

GrNtCh, PKC Ch Hillbilly Bildo
Pr Broken Oaks Wild Blue Gypsy


Posted by thomasg on 12-16-2019 01:08 PM:

I thinks I will just hunt a semi still to silent hound .lol


Posted by benderb4 on 12-16-2019 02:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by G.W. Harring
I agree.

As long as the rules of the competition give an advantage in points to a dog for opening first......you will ALWAYS have loose mouthed babblers being entered in that competition attempting to gain that advantage.



pardon my dummy. since when? I thought first tree got vantage. wiff nu tree rules on countdown git more points to tree first to.
been huntin round good bit. just like ghost mean nite hunt dogs nu rules dont need to protect.
never saw but a cuple real babblers in hunts . they is ghost to.
yu all need to breed dogs wiff better noses.

__________________
NOW THE LUNATICS ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM IN WASHINGTON,DC.
MY SILENCE DOES NOT MEAN I AGREE WITH YOU...IT MEANS YOUR LEVEL OF STUPIDITY RENDERS ME SPEECHLESS
I AM NOT ARGUING WITH YOU..I AM JUST TRYING TO EXPLAIN WHY I AM RIGHT
TRUTH IS TREASON IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES...G. Orwell
DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU...G. Carlin
ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE WORK RELENTLESSLY TO CENSOR THOSE WHO SPEAK THE TRUTH...Ron DeSantis


Posted by G.W. Harring on 12-16-2019 07:00 PM:

Re: Re: Babbling Rule and Stationary Rule

quote:
Originally posted by benderb4
This is copied and pasted from a quote on another answer.
' "Speculation" and "obvious" are, by definition, two very different words that have been used in debate as it relates to dogs running deer or fighting without actually seeing it. One is; rumor, gossip, assumption, guesswork, supposition, hearsay. The other is; clear, apparent, evident, recognizable, observable._

Myself, I'd never scratch a dog for running deer or fighting based on speculation._

so why would you be allowed to minus or delete a dogs strike points because you speculate ,guess,or assume, based on this quote from another thread it must be obvious ,clear, apparent, ?

I don't understand?
If we think a dog is running deer unless we see it we can't minus it.Not assumption or speculate.Because it's not fair.
If we think 2 dogs were fighting we must see it to scratch them.Not assumption or speculate.Because it's not fair.
If we think a dog is babbling we can minus it cause we think it is without any proof it actually babbled ?Isn't that assumption and speculation? But this is fair and okay?


So to agree with that theory and apply it to the strike, why should you be allowed to give a dog more strike points than the others because you speculate, guess, or assume, that it is "actually striking on coon scent"? If you're awarding up to 75 more points for it, shouldn't it be obvious, clear, or apparent? Or is it more fair to keep assuming and speculating that every time a dog opens off the snap it is smelling a coon and grant it up to a 75pt advantage for doing so? If everything else requires the burden of proof why shouldn't the strike points??

__________________
CORNERSTONE TREEING WALKERS
Greg & Marcia Harring
Syracuse, Nebraska
402-209-5053


Posted by Sgraves on 12-16-2019 07:20 PM:

The part in the rule where it says ( might not have it word for word). But it says when dog is struck under the min it has to show that it is taking the track out or determined to be false barking. The taking the track out part is the deal. The rule supports it , you can’t prove it or a lot of these dogs that are winning big would not be winning near as much. I mean some dogs make it look so good. An they have a coon to make it even harder to prove.


Posted by Bob Hennessey on 12-16-2019 10:54 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sgraves
The part in the rule where it says ( might not have it word for word). But it says when dog is struck under the min it has to show that it is taking the track out or determined to be false barking. The taking the track out part is the deal. The rule supports it , [/QUOT]
Under what rule did you find this?

__________________
Ignorance: the lack of knowledge, education, etc.
Stupidity: lacking normal intelligence.
Intelligence: the ability to learn or understand.
You can't fix STUPID!


Posted by novicane65 on 12-16-2019 11:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Sgraves
The part in the rule where it says ( might not have it word for word). But it says when dog is struck under the min it has to show that it is taking the track out or determined to be false barking. The taking the track out part is the deal. The rule supports it , you can’t prove it or a lot of these dogs that are winning big would not be winning near as much. I mean some dogs make it look so good. An they have a coon to make it even harder to prove.



That's is PKC rules about carrying the track out.

__________________
Eric DePue
Hill Country Kennels Itty-Bitty
PKC CH Wax's Late Night Boom
And
Partners on a few common trashy young dogs

Gone but not forgotten

GrNtCh, PKC Ch Hillbilly Bildo
Pr Broken Oaks Wild Blue Gypsy


Posted by Night Shift on 12-16-2019 11:42 PM:

there is always a winner and a loser. Most generally one of those losers will be crying wolf after the hunt. Facts are there’s a lot less cheating and a lot more not knowing the rules.

__________________
Jason Smith
Home Of
National GrNtCh GrNt GrCh Dark Side of Skuna River

Gr Nt Ch Maniac's Dark Side of the Moon


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:00 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club