UKC Forums Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 61 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Mean Dog???? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=352831)


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 07:29 PM:

Mean Dog????

Here is a situation that happened on Saturday night during a nite hunt, opinions please.

Zam and a female Redbone were treed, waited the 5 for the other dog to go in and he wouldn't leave their feet. So they were walking into the tree, the Redbone left and came back to the owner, Zam was holding the tree. Dog 3, suddenly leaves their feet and goes in and jumps on Zam, Zam turned around and lit into him, then went back to treeing. Frank scratched Zam for agression and asked the owner of dog 3 if he wanted him wrote up for fighting, to which he replied 'No, this guy (owner of dog 2) said he never seen him do that before in his life!' So Frank kenneled Zam and finished out the hunt, dog 2 would run a track, but never treed again and dog 3 never left their feet again.

So last night I took him out with 3 other males and a female dog. Zam and the other dogs treed 2 times and never a growl or any fighting what so ever. He hadn't hunted with these dogs before, so I found it odd that he didn't display any agression to the other 3 males and even acted disinterested when 2 of the other males got into it on lead. Both times we got into the tree the dogs were all jumping up and down and landing on each other and there was no fighting, not even a growl.

My question is...What the heck made him do that in the nite hunt? Frank said that dog 3 just went into Zam and jumped onto him and Zam spun around and floored him and went right back to treeing. Dog 3 was a 2 1/2 yr. old male, dog 2 was a 6 yr. old female and Zam is a 7 yr. old male, who hunts with other males with no problems and has never been aggressive to any other dog before.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by on 05-11-2010 07:42 PM:

Judge scraches a dog for fighting and then ASKS if someone wants the dog wrote up??? Now that's a new twist.......

Your dog was scratched for fighting, your dog should have been wrote up for it.


Posted by Justin Smith on 05-11-2010 08:03 PM:

He's been aggressive before , just nobody noticed the signs ... you gotta cut it off before it starts ... eyeballing , stiff legging , pee-ing on bushes and just anything that suggests a dog is thinking about how he stacks up.

Dogs speak dog ... their body language in itself has meaning .. obviously , those two dogs were saying something to each other that the humans didn't hear .

If your dog doesn't know he's the very bottom on any peck order on Earth ... he will eventually get into trouble .

A well mannered dog isn't a creation of nature or chance ...it's a creation of hard work and consistantly keeping them in check.


Posted by Okie Dawg on 05-11-2010 08:13 PM:

I would guess dog three was protective of the handler. Zam just protected himself and went back to treeing. I don't see a problem with Zam at all. Just hope he doesn't have to protect himself much or he will get mean..............
I would say he done just what I would want mine to do. If attacked, defend themself and when the dog backs off, go back to work. He only done what he had to do and no more.

__________________
UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL
Grady Jarvis
808 N. Main St.
Tonkawa Okla. 74653
580-628-0507
CH 'PR' Grady's Dark Woods Waylon -Bluetic

NITECH 'PR' Grady's Insane Tinker Bell (Tink) - Treeing walker --Okla. State Hunt open redg. winner

'PR' Grady's Barley - Treeing Walker


Posted by josh on 05-11-2010 08:36 PM:

Yup, and evryone has a dog that wont start anything but will darn sure finnish it.

The rules are clear on what to do with this situation, unfortunately they werent followed.


Posted by Buckskin Plott on 05-11-2010 08:47 PM:

We have a male that will get aggresive at the tree with one male and not others.. Dont know what started it other then the time it started was at a nite hunt. He hasnt been the same since.. These 2 dogs hunted together for months no trouble.. Hes been stomped over it switched and seems to be doing better. We hunt him with his Half sister all the time and never have a problem.. Ive heard a lot of reasons from breed ( not sure I believe this one) to Sire and Dam line etc.. If you figure it out let me know.. We will keep working on it . even though of just getting him fixed and see if that helps.. No interest in breeding him really so wouldnt hurt anything.

__________________
Boondoc Kennels , Home of. AKC/NKC Sickles Kayla, AKC Boondocs Whistleing Dixie, Boondocs


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 08:57 PM:

He has been hunted hundreds of times and NEVER displayed any type of agression before. If peeing on the weeds and bushes is agression, then all male dogs needs to be scratched for it, cause I see it ALL the time and it has never led to anything except hunting. I have seen the bowing up and the stiff legged walk and hackles raised, but never from him. I saw it last night between the 2 dogs that got into it on the lead and Zam wasn't bowed up, stiff legged or hackles raised, he just went on about his business and ignored him. I think that dog 3 should of also been scratched, #1 jumping on another dog is agression and #2, not hunting is another one. The Redbone wasn't protecting her owner, she just does that, trees and then leaves, why, I don't know. She had left the tree as soon as the lights came into the tree and went to hunting else where.

Frank was willing to write it up, but the 3rd guy in the cast said both dogs needed wrote up, a dog can't fight with it's self. The owner of Dog 3 said No and that was the end of it. I'll tell you one thing, if I was doing my job and something or someone jumped on my back, I'd go into protection mode too. A dog that wanted to fight would have kept on fighting, not let the dog go and go back to treeing, then ignore dog 3 treeing beside him after the rumble.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by nhcooner2 on 05-11-2010 09:07 PM:

Scratch them both.

Why wasn't Dog 3 scratched? An adult dog "jumping" onto another adult male dog at a tree, sounds like aggressive behavior to me and also a recipe for disaster! You should have made it a one dog cast!

Every dog is a gem....just ask the owner...."he never fights, nicest dog you'll ever see!"

Every dog has it in them, it just depends on the circumstances.

__________________
FC NH

GRFCH NITECH GRWCH GRCH 'PR' CHASES JUNKYARD BLUE GOOSE


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 09:08 PM:

My thoughts are...if this is going to happen in a nite hunt, but not pleasure hunting, then pleasure hunting is all we are going to do. It's not worth the aggravation to have this happen for just a piece of paper that says he can tree a coon, when we already know he can do it and do it well. After talking to a number of other people that hunted with dog 3, this seems to be a pattern for him. One day he is gonna tangle with a dog that won't back down, and get chewed up bad for it, but you can be sure, it ain't gonna be Zam that does it. He is done with the nite hunts, it just ain't worth it. I don't want a dog that as of now hunts good with other male dogs, get turned into one that doesn't.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 09:10 PM:

Re: Scratch them both.

quote:
Originally posted by nhcooner2
Why wasn't Dog 3 scratched? An adult dog "jumping" onto another adult male dog at a tree, sounds like aggressive behavior to me and also a recipe for disaster! You should have made it a one dog cast!



I agree with that one too. It would have been a no dog cast then, cause all that dog 2 did was run around boo hooing after that. It was a poor night to begin with, blowing, raining and COLD. Nasty night for hunting and no one came back with plus points.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by Dale Young on 05-11-2010 09:14 PM:

In this case if they all saw it as it was stated they scratched the wrong dog. Any such situtation I let my dog know thats not what they're supposed to do but if dog 3 run up and jumped him that makes dog 3 the agressor.


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 09:19 PM:

Dale, I didn't think of it that way before, but you know, that would make sense. Not defending my dog, he did turn around and flop him, but yes, there wouldn't have been a problem if dog 3 hadn't jump on him.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by on 05-11-2010 09:19 PM:

If I had a 7 year old dog that got in a scrap for the first time, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. I wouldn't quit hunting him and I wouldn't quit putting him in nite hunts because of it. Not for one time in 7 years.
You can't explain or figure out everything a dog does. Or people either for that matter. But one thing is for certain, anytime a dog is scratched for fighting, that dog must be written up for it. No excuses, no explainations. Any judge that SFF's a dog without writing it up should not be judgeing.


Posted by Maniac on 05-11-2010 09:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
If I had a 7 year old dog that got in a scrap for the first time, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. I wouldn't quit hunting him and I wouldn't quit putting him in nite hunts because of it. Not for one time in 7 years.
You can't explain or figure out everything a dog does. Or people either for that matter. But one thing is for certain, anytime a dog is scratched for fighting, that dog must be written up for it. No excuses, no explainations. Any judge that SFF's a dog without writing it up should not be judgeing.

I AGREE JIM!! THIS HAPPENS TO MUCH!!

__________________
MANIAC MY NAME HUNTING MY GAME!!
MANIAC BLOOD ROCKS!! WHERE THE TRACK POWER IS!!

http://i774.photobucket.com/albums/yy24/maniacjr4/SAM_0522.jpg

http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/1619.jpg

IF YOU WANT TO PACK HUNT
BUY YOU A PAIR BEAGLES!


GR NITE CH. HARWOODMANIAC JR 4 # 2 TOP 100 UKC WORLD 2013 OWNER JAY HYDE & DAVID DEPEW




GRNITE CH Hoghill Harwood Kasper
owners Hyde Warlick Leatherman
Qualified for 2013 world Hhunt
OWNER HYDE & WARLICK LEATHERMAN. MY PH 574 306 8438
K-LIGHTS ph.936 767 4965
http://i774.photobucket.com/albums/yy24/maniacjr4/SAM_0734.jpg


Posted by boonetreecoon on 05-11-2010 10:50 PM:

The other guys dog jumped on him? Well the other guys dog should have been scratched too. I had a dog like that he'd only fight if bitten into. Sounds like your dog was defending himself the judge was probably bein smart when he asked the other guy if he wanted him to be written up. Did they actually see him jump on him?

__________________
Home of
Nite champ skuna river aftershock(Sadie)
Nite champ vaughns tree thumping blaze I (one win towards grand)
Sorrells screamin fred


Posted by Cody Carroll on 05-11-2010 11:17 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dale Young
In this case if they all saw it as it was stated they scratched the wrong dog. Any such situtation I let my dog know thats not what they're supposed to do but if dog 3 run up and jumped him that makes dog 3 the agressor.


i agree. its just like a person getting into a fight. if somebody punches you, odds are you will punch back. dog 3 seems to be the agressor to me

__________________
Cody Carroll
(757) 755-5820

proud member of the United States Navy Submarine Force

Former home of:
GRNITECH GRCH 'PR' Hardwood Ontime Abby


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-11-2010 11:18 PM:

Yes, they all watched dog 3 jump on Zam. Frank was the judge as well as the guide and No, he didn't scratch him, but he withdrew him, whatever that means. The guy that had dog 2 told him not to withdraw him, but Frank did anyway and dog 3 never left their feet the rest of the hunt. The tree was closed when they walked into it and dog 3 took off and jumped on Zam, who then flopped him and went back to treeing.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by EARL BINGHAM on 05-11-2010 11:53 PM:

fighting

you are not to withdraw a dog to keep from being scratched for fighting.if dog 3 jumped on him then dog 3 is scratched noone else, but i wonder why dog 2 quit treeing and came to owner?????????????

__________________
PAPAW TO
MADISON SHAE
MASON EARL (R.I.P.)
PAYTEN PAIGE


Posted by Rip on 05-12-2010 12:32 AM:

Are you meaning "jumped on him" as in jumped on him fighting/biting or are you meaning "jumped on him" as in jumped up the tree and landed on him?

Big difference between the two.

One is agressive behavior the other is not.

If the first dog just landed on Zam then the correct dog was scratched.

If the first dog came in and started fighting Zam then the wrong dog was scratched.

Landing on a dog is not agressive behavior.

__________________
Let's go huntin


Posted by Phantom on 05-12-2010 12:36 AM:

A judge that I beleive I also see you say before also is a moh that don't scratch a dog for fighting? and you all are some thats against mean dogs going by some of your post before? not much of a judge to ask if someone wants a dog to be scratched for fighting and don't just do it like going by rules it should have been done. so much for doing his part to help get mean dogs out of the hunts.


me personally I could care less about mean dogs.just seems odd to me some people talk one thing then look the other way when it times to do what they always say should be done.

__________________
If you can't run with the big dawgs keep your puppy a$$ on the porch.


Posted by blue blue on 05-12-2010 12:48 AM:

Maybe

i'm reading this wrong or missing something but if the cast is at the tree watching a dog tree and another dog comes in and jumps on the dog treeing for no reason only that dog would be scratched even if there is a fight you scratch the one that started it is what i always thought. I have been wrong before though.

__________________
Bob Turnbow 931-212-0069


Posted by EnglishBabe on 05-12-2010 01:08 AM:

Dog 2 always leaves the tree anymore, that is just how she is. When I say jumped on him, I'm saying left their feet, went in, jumped on Zam's back and got flopped and then started treeing beside him. Tree was closed, so he wouldn't have gained anything by it anyway. I watch 2 male dogs tap dance on him last night and he didn't even act like it bothered him. These same 2 dogs later had a rumble on the lead and Zam ignored them. I'm not sure what Frank was thinking, I think he just didn't really want to hunt and that was an easy way out for him. You have to know Frank to understand what I'm talking about. As a MOH, yes he should of done the right thing, which I seem to be getting that both dogs should have been wrote up. If this is the only time it is ever going to happen, what did it hurt, if Zam never did it again. As I stated earlier, it ain't worth the aggravation and nite hunting is out for Zam from now on. He is one hell of a coondog and doesn't need that crap. Heck, I hunt him more then Frank does, so I know him better then Frank. I have watched both male and female dogs jockey for position on him and around him and have NEVER seen or heard him blow up and he has hunted with known aggressive dogs and there has never been a problem from him. Maybe a flunk thing, but not worth turning him mean or getting him chewed up over that GRNITECH title for.

__________________
American Leopard Hound
FNL Hanselman's Blu Pixie Dust


Posted by Rip on 05-12-2010 01:22 AM:

Sorry but from what you just said, the dog just landed on Zam, that's not agression per UKC rules.

Zam would have been the only dog written up because he would have been considered the agressor.

If a dog is jumping the tree and lands on another dog, as you described, then if the dog he landed on bites him the dog he landed on is considered the agressor and is the only one scratched.

If the other dog had just ran in and tackled Zam/attacked him then Zam should not have been scratched because he would have been just defending himself and the other dog would have been considered the agressor.

__________________
Let's go huntin


Posted by S & N Rains on 05-12-2010 03:31 AM:

JMO

Even if the Zam dog was just defending himself both dogs should have been scratched. If the one dog was being aggressive when jumping on him and then Zam for fighting back. I have seen dogs that have been attacked first but because they fought back were scratched because it takes 2 to fight. So in my opionion Zam should have been scratched and if the other dog jumped on him in a mean manner not just going in to the tree and accidently landed on him he should have been scracted as well. Our dog got scratched in the Zones 2 years ago because a dog was growling and trying to bite him and our male was litterally backing away towards the people in the cast but he was showing his teeth to the other dog. Litterally just showing his teeth not even growling but it was concidered aggressive behavior and both dogs got scratched. So if the he was just defending himself thing worked to keep a dog from getting scratched then ours would have been fine. But that isn't how the rules work so we took our scratch as much as it stunk and went home. We still hunt him, he is not perfect, but we know he doesn't start fights or try to be mean to other dogs. But sometimes things happen it is part of the sport as much as I wish it didn't.

__________________
Home of
NiteCH 'PR' Rains Smoken Gun
'PR' Rains Lil' Bit of Hope

He may be ugly but he looks good on the wood.


Posted by BAWL_TRACK on 05-12-2010 04:38 AM:

i dont see how it be his fault ....... if you was workin an sombody else run in an jumped on you ... would you go back to work with out doin anyuthing?? ...... no an dnt say its dogs not people an its a hunt etc... who cares same concept......

__________________
Weston Tungate
1-270-321-2369


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM. Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 61 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club