UKC Forums
Show all 5 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Major Victory Against Hsus (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=303896)


Posted by skyblu on 10-04-2009 03:09 PM:

Major Victory Against Hsus

-----Original Message-----
From: Geraldine Clarke <geraldine101010@yahoo.com>
To: VCNM <VCNM_Animal_Control_Forum@yahoogroups.com>; Mepetlaw <MEPetLaw@yahoogroups.com>; CAdogHunters <californiadoghunters@yahoogroups.com>; dems4pets <dems4pets@yahoogroups.com>; pet-law@yahoogroups.com; spdbs <spdbs@yahoogroups.com>; CAPLA <CAPLA@yahoogroups.com>; Arizona <AAAVA@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Oct 3, 2009 3:51 pm
Subject: [petlaw] Fw: [CA-animal-legislation] Fwd: LKC Lawsuit


Permission to crosspost

A major victory!! This is a Federal ruling so it sets a precedent for the entire country against draconian animal legislation. The Bill of Rights lives! (Although I'm sure HSUS's attorneys are going over the ruling with a fine tooth comb right now to prepare a lawsuit for the Supreme Court.)

Doing the happy dance,

Geraldine

---Permission to cross-post.'''
I'm on the phone with Barbara Haines, Louisville Kennel Club. We've been
waiting for this decision for almost a year, but it was worth the wait.

This ruling by a federal judge (an esteemed Constitutional scholar) is a
profound victory.

This precedent has far-reaching implications, and sets the stage for
class-action lawsuits nationwide - anywhere similar ordinances have been
enacted, a
nd Constitutional rights of pet owners have been violated

Highlights of the FEDERAL ruling:

1. Pets are personal property, under the Constitution. Due process, search
and seizure, etc.. (all protections provided by Constitution) apply to pets.
You are the OWNER of your pets (not the "guardian.")
2. Requirements for housing, treatment, etc.. cannot be mandated by
legislation to be different for intact dogs (vs. altered dogs.).
3. Seizure bond is FLAT-OUT illegal and unconstitutional. This practice
constitutes unlawful taking of personal property. If, after search warrant
is obtained, a person is arrested and their dogs are seized, their dogs
must be held AS IS (cannot be sterilized while held, cannot be sold,
"transferred" or euthanized) unless the owner is found guilty after trial.
Meantime, owner DOES NOT have to pay a dime for their care, until/unless
they are found guilty of the charges

Tina Perriguey

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by larrypoe on 10-04-2009 07:20 PM:

Well SOB, they finaly got it right for once.

__________________
GRNTCH GRCH ROBINSONS ENGLISH LOOSER

RIP Loose


Posted by Rick Ennen on 10-04-2009 07:25 PM:

That is a great outcome. Kudos to all involved in getting it right.


Posted by coon's age on 10-05-2009 12:56 AM:

Praise GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not only the bill of rights,some common since still lives.Good news.


Posted by Chiggers on 10-06-2009 02:27 AM:

BTT

__________________
Perry Metcalf.. Go Big Blue !


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.
Show all 5 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club