UKC Forums
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- SPCA Outrage in Philadelphia (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=292215)


Posted by doglaw on 08-07-2009 03:19 PM:

SPCA Outrage in Philadelphia

Click here to read how Philadelphia police confiscated half of a pack of hunting Basset Hounds and gave them to animal activists:

http://neveryetmelted.com/2009/08/0...n-philadelphia/

Please contact these officials and let them know how you feel about this violation of her rights:

Ms. Harrise Yaron, Chairman of the Board, PSPCA E-mail: hyaron@aol.com[/email]

Ms. Susan Cosby, CEO of PSPCA Erie Ave Shelter E-mail: scosby@pspca.org
TN: 215-426-6300, Ext. 214

Mr. Ray Little, Director of Adoptions and Foster Care/Rescue Groups
E-mail: rlittle@pspca.org
TN: 215-426-6304, Ext. 251 Cell: 215-816-5301
Fax: 215-426-4517

Ms. Gail Luciani, Chief Public Relations Officer, PSPCA E-mail: [email]gluciani@pspca.org
TN: 215-426-6300, Ext. 213 Cell: 215-901-9706

__________________
Cindy Cooke
Legislative Specialist

Permission to repost


Posted by lockednks on 08-07-2009 03:39 PM:

I just got into an argument last night about the SPCA and the HSUS. People don't understand that if they have their way there will be NO dog breeding left in this country!

I sent all three people listed an email and will post this on other boards I frequent.


Posted by Buckshot on 08-07-2009 03:41 PM:

Thanks for posting this.............I also hunt with basset hounds and will help get this out.


Posted by lockednks on 08-07-2009 03:50 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Buckshot
Thanks for posting this.............I also hunt with basset hounds and will help get this out.


Buck, have you heard of this Club before? From reading the article they sound like a pretty prestigious organization.


Posted by skyblu on 08-07-2009 03:55 PM:

Why can't SEC 2 of this Act be used?

One hundred ninth Congress
of the
United States of America
At the Second Session


To provide the Department of Justice the necessary authority to apprehend, prosecute,
and convict individuals committing animal enterprise terror.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act’’.
SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF ECONOMIC DAMAGE TO ANIMAL ENTERPRISES AND THREATS OF DEATH
AND SERIOUS BODILY INJURY TO ASSOCIATED PERSONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 43 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
‘‘§ 43. Force, violence, and threats involving animal enterprises
(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes to be used the mail or any
facility of interstate or foreign commerce—
(1) for the purpose of damaging or interfering with the operations of an animal enterprise; and
(2) in connection with such purpose—
(A) intentionally damages or causes the loss of any real or personal property (including animals
or records) used by an animal enterprise, or any real or personal property of a person or entity having a
connection to, relationship with, or transactions with an animal enterprise;
(B) intentionally places a person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to that
person, a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person, or a spouse or
intimate partner of that person by a course of conduct involving threats, acts of vandalism, property
damage, criminal trespass, harassment, or intimidation; or
(C) conspires or attempts to do so;
shall be punished as provided for in subsection (b).
(b) PENALTIES.—The punishment for a violation of section (a) or an attempt or conspiracy to violate subsection
(a) shall be—
(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment not more than 1 year, or both, if the offense does not instill in
another the reasonable fear of serious bodily injury or death and—
(A) the offense results in no economic damage or bodily injury; or
(B) the offense results in economic damage that does not exceed $10,000;
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, if no bodily injury occurs
and—
(A) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $10,000 but not exceeding $100,000; or
(B) the offense instills in another the reasonable fear of serious bodily injury or death;
(3) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if—
(A) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $100,000; or
(B) the offense results in substantial bodily injury to another individual;
(4) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both, if—
(A) the offense results in serious bodily injury to another individual; or
2
(B) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $1,000,000; and
(5) imprisonment for life or for any terms of years, a fine under this title, or both, if the offense results in
death of another individual.
(c) RESTITUTION.—An order of restitution under section 3663 or 3663A of this title with respect to a violation
of this section may also include restitution—
(1) for the reasonable cost of repeating any experimentation that was interrupted or invalidated as a result
of the offense;
(2) for the loss of food production or farm income reasonably attributable to the offense; and
(3) for any other economic damage, including any losses or costs caused by economic disruption,
resulting from the offense.
(d) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section—
(1) the term ‘animal enterprise’ means—
(A) a commercial or academic enterprise that uses or sells animals or animal products for profit,
food or fiber production, agriculture, education, research, or testing;
(B) a zoo, aquarium, animal shelter, pet store, breeder, furrier, circus, or rodeo, or other lawful
competitive animal event; or
(C) any fair or similar event intended to advance agricultural arts and sciences;
(2) the term ‘course of conduct’ means a pattern of conduct composed of 2 or more acts, evidencing a
continuity of purpose;
(3) the term ‘economic damage’—
(A) means the replacement costs of lost or damaged property or records, the costs of repeating an
interrupted or invalidated experiment, the loss of profits, or increased costs, including losses and
increased costs resulting from threats, acts or vandalism, property damage, trespass, harassment, or
intimidation taken against a person or entity on account of that person’s or entity’s connection to,
relationship with, or transactions with the animal enterprise; but
(B) does not include any lawful economic disruption (including a lawful boycott) that results
from lawful public, governmental, or business reaction to the disclosure of information about an animal
enterprise;
(4) the term ‘serious bodily injury’ means—
(A) injury posing a substantial risk of death;
(B) extreme physical pain;
(C) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or
(D) protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty;
and
(5) the term ‘substantial bodily injury’ means—
(A) deep cuts and serious burns or abrasions;
(B) short-term or nonobvious disfigurement;
(C) fractured or dislocated bones, or torn members of the body;
(D) significant physical pain;
(E) illness;
(F) short-term loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or
(G) any other significant injury to the body.
(e) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed—
(1) to prohibit any expressive conduct (including peaceful picketing or other peaceful demonstration)
protected from legal prohibition by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
(2) to create new remedies for interference with activities protected by the free speech or free exercise
clauses of the First Amendment to the Constitution, regardless of the point of view expressed, or to limit any
existing legal remedies for such interference; or
(3) to provide exclusive criminal penalties or civil remedies with respect to the conduct prohibited by this
action, or to preempt State or local laws that may provide such penalties or remedies.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to section 43 in the table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘43. Force, violence, and threats involving

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by Buckshot on 08-07-2009 04:07 PM:

No lockednks, I am not familiar with them. They are a private club and I am not a member of any of those private basset hound hunt clubs that are out there.

Yea there is some prestigious clubs out there.

Check this article out:

http://www.huntinglife.com/blog/det...ashland-bassets


Posted by skyblu on 08-07-2009 05:40 PM:

This situation another example of

Reasons to NOT publish your physical address when you advertise pups.
Reasons NOT to let "just anyone" come to the property where you keep dogs.
Reasons to use a P. O. Box.
Reasons to NEVER tell anyone how many dogs you have.

I list my phone number on my Coonhound news colmns & get calls from people OBVIOUSLY not "One of Us". A recent call was a guy asking if I was texas Black & Tan Association. He claimed I sold him a dog that was running deer! I informed him I didn't sell him ANYTHING & I don't have dogs for sale - he hung up. Another call that has come at least three times from the same individual is "Do you have hound?" and when I ask what kind of hounds, he says "Hounds." But when I ask what he wants, he doesn't have an answer. The called ID shows "Out of Area" and Arkansas."
I consider this call an "AR" call because I've been informed I'm on their "hit list" because I was responsible for the desolution of a local PAWS group when they attempted to take over the whole County with sweeping laws & restrictions.

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by Randy Tallon on 08-08-2009 12:46 AM:

btt

__________________
UKC GrNtCh PKC Ch Pa HTX Sniper (Deceased) Four time qualified for World Championship
Duane and Seth Jones/Jarret Davis partners
Beaver River Kennels/Team Pa
USAF proud!!! 6 Years active 19 Reserves MSgt (ret) Raven 457
Carpe Nocturnum-Seize the night!


Posted by bond007 on 08-08-2009 03:43 AM:

all of the code laws that are used are under the ucc code. if you use the ucc code against the ones that use them against you as long as you caused no damage you can beat them100% of the time.

there is three things in law that is required.
1. acceptance
2. contract
3. damage

if the opposing people have just one of these they can beat you

however after reading the spca taking the dogs. there had never been any complaints in the past. they just decided to take them.
the dog owner has a 100% win if they would decide to follow up on it. you would need only to file the suit. dont use a lawyer. you can do it yourself. judges work for the state, and so do the lawyers. you dont need them.
The BIBLE is very clear on what GOD thinks about lawyers.

__________________
Home of :
Dual Grand Wicked Triple Threat
.....................PLATIUM CH MOOSE
...........PLATIUM CH ZEB AGAIN
.....................PLATIUM CH RUBY
GOLD CH TRIPLE THREAT
.....................PLATIUM CH STY CLOVER
............SILVER CH LATE NITE TRICK
.....................GOLD CH SNUG
3 GENERATION ALL SILVER OR BETTER
THE ONLY ONE IN PKC HISTORY


Posted by Buckshot on 08-12-2009 12:50 AM:

Responce from owner of Murder Hollow Bassets

First a huge thank you for all your words of support and everything that you have done! I had my third visit today from the PSPCA and again threats of multiple citations if I didn't cooperate with these lovely folks. I can fill you in the details, but more important fish to fry (sorry, Jeep).

I have been deluged by phone calls and e-mails from all over the country, from a lawyer in GA (" forget the SPCA, go directly to the State Attorney General") to the manager of a shelter in IL ("can't believe.. and horrified"). The blogs seem to have been in over drive.

Good news is we got a very sympathetic article in one of the two major papers today. A reporter has also called from the Philadelphia Inquirer, as well as the AKC and the Chronicle of the Horse (Molly Sorgi? 804-994-2349) . My problem is that if I respond personally, the SPCA has made it clear that I must "cooperate or multiple citations will be issued and there would be no PA Kennel License".

So here is my response to the PSPCA website (http://www.pspca.org/ news), first article about the Murder Hollow Bassets. I cannot respond to anyone in the media or even the PSPCA, but I can let you know. Whatever you chose to do with my information, oh well.

1. Only one dog barking complaint from unknown neighbor, no other complaints. That neighbor has yet to come forth, although all, I mean all have expressed dismay in writing. Never in the 22 years of having a kennel here has anyone come to me to complain in person, writing, or e-mail.

2. The websites indicated that the SPCA left requests to be contacted. The 'Humane Law Officer' (her term, not mine) left a card in my door with no information, no requests for a call, no warnings or no citations a few days before the raid. Absolutely none. She could have left a note to call, because I get lots of cards from grass cutters to painters. No mention of any 12 dog limit in the city.

3. Yes, I initially refused entry with a long explanation about abuses due to the new Dog Law. Two Dog Law Officers (from Harrisburg in two trucks), three PSPCA officers (in three trucks, not including the small truck with those tiny multiple pens on the side), and two Police Officers (two police cars) quickly returned with a search warrant.

4. The PSPCA did NOT work with the owner to reduce the number of dogs. Officer Tara Loller repeatedly, repeatedly threatened to take all the dogs if I did not give her 10. Under extreme duress and far outnumbered, I handed over 10 hounds. Talk about Sophie's Choice in the dark. Then they found Hansel and demanded one more. I gave them my other house hound, taking off her collar and Invisible Fence collar. All the time crying hysterically and protesting loudly.

5. When forced to sign release papers for the now 11 hounds, I explained that Betsy Park was the technical owner of three and wrote her name at the bottom of the forms. (Betsy, sending you copies.) Officer Loller assured me that Betsy Park would get first consideration for adoption.

6. A 'Warning' for re-inspection was issued, but no other warning or citation. A copy of the Philadelphia Animals laws (17 pages) included 3 lines which stated "No residential dwelling unit shall keep a total of more than twelve (12) adult dogs or cats combined of which no more than four (4) may be unneutered", was left in my kennels. These laws were never handed to me before or after the raid, and I was never informed of these laws by my Philadelphia Vet or the Philadelphia Dog Licensing Agency that took my money year after year.

7. At the first re-inspection, the 'Humane Law Officer' was accompanied by an Assistant District Attorney, Barbara Paul. They found the conditions of the hounds (one bitch needed nail trimming, all done by my Vet) and kennels to be satisfactory (some ceiling insulation tiles were more securely fastened). The indentations in the limestone screenings outside the kennel made by random scratching will be filled with more screenings. That should have been accomplished, but the black cloud over the kennel dropped 6+" of rain on Sunday. Tons of stone are being dumped on the lane first.

8. The DA left her card and asked to be phoned with questions. I e-mailed her a question about the definition of "residential dwelling unit". Is the barn a separate unit? As it was constructed and only used by hounds, does that make the barn a residential unit? She replied that she could not give me that information because we may be in "adversarial positions" and directed me to the Philadelphia Bar Lawyer Referrals.

9. To date, no one has been told of the location of the seized hounds and no calls have been returned from Officer Ray Little, the PSPCA Adoption Agent. A neighboring Vet who has offered free health care for the life of the adoptees and wants Khaki has not heard from them. David Gottier who wants the two litter mates of his hounds and Sandy McKenna who wants the one year old fuzzy bitch have been stone walled. Dr. Roy Feldman and Pat Renner from my Hunt have not heard back. But there is an urgent message on the PSPCA website asking for foster homes and adoptions, because they have no room in the shelter.

Again, I am asking you to be in the position of the messenger, but feel free to ask me any questions. Thank you SO much.

Wendy


Posted by Buckshot on 08-16-2009 10:00 PM:

From: BCHA (Basset Hound Club of America)

"Most of the dog world has heard about the outrageous seizure of 11 Basset Hounds from the Murder Hollow Basset Hound Pack in Philadelphia. Supposedly there had been a noise/odor complaint from a neighbor, which is questionable, and the Pennsylvania SPCA claims the dogs were in "deplorable" condition.

A reputable attorney has been retained for Wendy Willard to defend her against the abuse and other charges brought against her. The citations were not served until some two weeks after the seizure of the dogs. The court date is Aug. 27.

Two separate legal funds are to be set up to take donations to assist with Ms. Willard's defense and to follow up with action against the PSPCA. Further information will be forwarded to all interested parties as soon as details are ironed out.

Initially, it was believed that the dogs had been turned over to Tri-State Basset Hound Rescue. After a few days of refusing to answer any inquiries, the Tri-State president did get on the phone with a representative of another Basset Hound pack and claimed they were supposed to get 10 of the dogs but never got them. The whereabouts of the 11 dogs is still a mystery.

Photos of the dogs, believed to have been taken shortly after they were confiscated, show them to be in excellent condition…good weight, clean, etc. What they look like today is anyone's guess.
Despite offers from several other packs to take the dogs in, the PSPCA has refused to communicate with anyone about the status of the dogs.

The Basset Hound Club of America is staying on top of the situation and anticipates being involved in the fund-raising effort which will get underway shortly. Our members, and all other dog owners everywhere, should be aware that if this situation is not resolved in favor of the owner and her dogs it could happen to any dog owner in any state or municipality."


Posted by Buckshot on 08-19-2009 12:09 AM:

quote:

The National Animal Interest Alliance (NAIA) is coordinating a defense fund for Wendy Willard whose hounds were seized by the Philadelphia Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals under questionable circumstances.

"An attorney has been obtained and we are working with him to coordinate assistance from a number of interested groups, including the Masters of Foxhounds of Association, the National Beagle Club of America, Inc., the Pennsylvania Federation of Dog Clubs, local hunt clubs, local dog clubs and other interested parties.In addition, these groups and their members will be available to provide informational resources to bolster the defense in this case. We are exploring further actions regarding the Philadelphia dog limit law, their spay/neuter requirements, the possibly unconstitutional taking of her property and the violation of her civil rights. These actions will be costly, but we believe they are worthwhile.

The NAIA Trust uses its funds to combat overreaching legislation and to combat these types of laws around the country.If your club or you are able to donate to this crucial effort to correct injustice and combat laws that take away our right to own dogs, donations to the Defense Fund may be made on-line through PayPal or by credit card by clicking on the following link and entering the amount to be donated in the input box. After entering the amount of the donation, click on the "Submit" button which takes you to the page where you can identify yourself and provide credit card information. Please insert "Defense" in the space on the line available for the "billing address Line 2" so we can keep an accurate accounting of donations.

The donation link is http://www.naiatrust.org/donationForm.htm
If you wish to mail a contribution, you can send it to:
NAIA Trust Legal Defense Fund
PO Box 66579
Portland Oregon 97290-6579

Please circulate this to any interested parties.

Julian Prager
NAIA Legislative Coordinator
NAIA Trust Legal Advisory Board Member


Posted by Buckshot on 08-20-2009 03:05 AM:

Statement from Mark Chryssanthis of BHCA

The Basset Hound Club of America is assisting defense fund efforts for Wendy Willard whose 11 hounds from the Murder Hollow Basset Hound Pack were seized by the Philadelphia Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals under questionable circumstances. An attorney has been obtained and we are working with him to coordinate assistance from a number of interested groups, including the Masters of Foxhounds Association, the National Beagle Club of America, Inc., the Pennsylvania Federation of Dog Clubs, local hunt clubs, local dog clubs and other interested parties.

In addition, these groups and their members will be available to provide informational resources to bolster the defense in this case. Further actions are being explored regarding the Philadelphia dog limit law, their spay/neuter requirements, the possibly unconstitutional taking of her property and the violation of her civil rights. These actions will be costly, but we believe they are worthwhile.

If your club or you are able to donate to this crucial effort to correct injustice and combat laws that take away our right to own dogs, please send your check, made payable to BHCA, to Brian Pechtold, treasurer, 44W985 State Route 72, Hampshire, IL 60140-8271. Indicate on the memo line that the money is for the "Pack Legal Fund." Donations, as they come in, will be forwarded directly to the attorney.

A second legal fund has been set up by the National Animal Interest Alliance (NAIA), which is taking donations on line. If there is an excess at the end of this process, the money will be pro-rated between the BHCA and the NAIA. Any funds returned to the BHCA will go into our Basset Hound Health and Welfare Foundation, a non-profit, tax-deductible organization recently established by BHCA.

Keep in mind that what happened to Wendy Willard can happen to any of us who own multiple dogs. This must stop with Philadelphia.


Posted by Buckshot on 08-20-2009 03:07 AM:

National Animal Interest Alliance Filing Lawsuit Against PSPCA

The National Animal Interest Alliance has retained an attorney to file suit against the Pennsylvania SPCA, the City of Philadelphia, and the District Attorney of the City of Philadelphia in the case where PSPCA seized 11 basset hounds from Wendy Willard, master of the Murder Hollow Pack.

The suit and associated actions will address the local ordinance that PSPCA used to seize the hounds and the "deal-making" that was done (eg. threats against Willard) to obtain the hounds from the property.

Julian Prager, a board member of the Alliance, also serves as a member of the Pennsylvania Dog Law Advisory Board and is the legislative contact for the Pennsylvania Federation of Dog Clubs. Mr. Prager indicates that the legal action will be landmark in that it represents sporting dog owners fighting back against the abuse of police powers by animal rights groups and addresses the unconstitutional manner in which local governments are enacting prohibitive ordinances.

Donations to the legal fund may be sent to "NAIA Trust Legal Defense Fund, P.O. Box 66579, Portland OR 92790-6579". Include a note that any donations should be applied to the Wendy Willard defense fund.

You may remember that Willard's home was invaded just before dark by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, PSPCA, and local police under suspicion that she was operating an illegal "puppy mill". When it was discovered that she had less than 26 dogs on the premises, the Dept. of Ag backed off. However, PSPCA insisted that Willard surrender 11 of the bassets stating that she was in violation of a new ordinance which prohibited keeping more than 12 animals on a property. In return PSPCA stated they would not prosecute Willard. If she failed to take the deal, PSPCA threatened they would take all of the dogs. Since then PSPCA has been hiding the animals and has refused offers from the local basset, beagle, and foxhound community to take the hounds from their shelter and house them until Willard can come into compliance.


Posted by skyblu on 08-20-2009 03:30 AM:

I'm mailing $ tomorrow

My budget is limited - but every dollar will help

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by Buckshot on 11-18-2009 04:48 AM:

UPDATE November 17, 2009

The two noise code violation complaints that were filed against Wendy Willard by the PSPCA and issued by the City of Philadelphia, Department of Health, alleging animal noise and excessive animal sounds, under sections 10-105(4) and 10-403(6) of the Philadelphia Code, respectively, were dismissed at an administrative hearing today. This victory was the first action on the case. These were the original charges that lead to PSPCA to want entry to her property.

We still are unable find out the whereabouts or condition of the hounds that were seized by the PSPCA and probably won't until the hearing on the cruelty charges in January. This is still a complex case and we are spending about $10,000 a month to get this prepared. If any of you know groups that might want to support this other than our current supporters (NAIA, Master's of Foxhounds, Pennsylvania Federation of Dog Clubs, National Beagle Club, National Basset Club, U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance), please let us know because we need to keep the
money coming in to take this to a successful conclusion.

A full win on this will overturn the mandatory spay neuter laws for anyone having over 4 dogs in Philadelphia and eliminate the arbitrary limit laws there. This would establish a precedent based on constitutional grounds and will be useful in fighting these laws in jurisdictions across the country.

I will keep you posted as the case progresses.

Permission granted to crosspost.

Julian Prager
NAIA Legislative Coordinator
PFDC Legislative
Chair


Posted by skyblu on 11-18-2009 02:16 PM:

Kentucky Federal Judge Ruling

A Federal Judge ruled in Kentucky that animals are PROPERTY & if seized LEGALLY, cannot be sold, euthanized or sterilized unless the owner is CONVICTED & found guilty. The judge also ruled that the owner cannot be required to pay ANY expenses in advance & that those seizing the animals are totally repsonsible for ALL CARE & if owner is found NOT GUILTY, the owner cannot be required to pay ANY expenses.
All STATES need to adopt this ruling & it would put a stop to outrageous AR actions such as this sad Penn. situation.

__________________
SKY
___________________
Author of the novel "Follow Jennifer"


Posted by Cleo on 11-18-2009 02:33 PM:

This is UNREAL!

BTT

__________________
BROKEN ROAD KENNEL
Breeding for the future of the Treeing Walker
"God bless the Broken Road"
~A man is only as good as his word~

Proud home to;

'PR' Kentucky River Fly Again (Kentucky River Rowdy frozen semen)
ACHA CHT x3 Broken Roads Little Texas (Kentucky River Rowdy x Houses Lipper's Hope)
CH Broken Roads Southern Stylish Boom (Kentucky River Rowdy x Houses Lipper's Hope)
Broken Road's Rowdy Lil Miss (Kentucky River Rowdy x Houses Lipper's Hope)
Broken Road's Meabie I will (Lipper's Rooster x Missy)
Broken Roads IMA Boomer2 (UKC NATL GRCH GRNTCH Honest Abe x Broken Roads Southern Stylish Boom
~~~~~Watch out!~~~~~
They just might make an IMPACT!

and the girls...Punkin and Tater!

Gone by never forgotten ~ Fly high my beautiful angels
~ GRCH GNTCH PKC SC Toucan Sam
~CH Toucan's Ugly Betty
~ CCH CH Southforks September Rain
~ Martin's Daisy JJ (what a beautiful litter you left behind)
~ Luke, the lab who brought us so many doves and ducks over the years
~ UKC GRCH,ACHA CH 2014 LWCH 2014 2 x's ACHA YOUTH WCH AKC CH AKC CH 'PR' Kentucky River Mundar ~ (Kentucky River Rowdy frozen semen) DNA Profiled ~ Fly high, old friend.

"The WILL of God will never take you where the GRACE of God can not protect you!"


Posted by Cynthia on 11-18-2009 05:42 PM:

what about the AKC or the UKC?

__________________
2012 National Grand Show Champion, World Show Bluetick Female CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)
2012 Purina Show Bluetick Breed Winner GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Grt Balls o' Fire (Jerry Lee)
2013 World Champion Bluetick, 2013 AO Overall Bred By winner GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder)
2015 AO Overall Dual Champion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It (breeder/owner/handler)
2016 Grand American Overall Dual Ch, Overall Show CHampion NTCH GRCH 'PR' Sexy and I know It


AKC CSG, UKC CCH GRCH 'PR' Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)
2010 National Grand Champion Bluetick
2013 AO Bluetick Stud Dog winner

CCH GCH 'PR' Southern Flame Elvira - the one that started it all

southernflamekennel@earthlink.net

RIP Southern Flame Elvira (the cornerstone of the kennel) 5/16/02-1/17/14

RIP Southern Flame Scarlet (the lone Redbone) 5/11/01-7/19/13

RIP Southern Flame Wild Irish Rose (Rosie) 6/15/09 - 3/12/15

RIP Southern Flame Too Hot to Trot (Bonnie) 3/27/07 - 4/20/15

RIP Southern Flame Bad News Bandit (Bandit)

RIP Southern Flame Triple Trouble (TT) 12/17/04 - 11/19/16

RIP Southern Flame Blame it on the Rain (Rain)

RIP AdeleMay's a Smokey Bandit (Adele)

RIP Southern Flame I Like Ike (Ike)

RIP Bella the Beagle

Bear, Jerry Lee, Camo, Maybellene, Lacy, Thor, Sissy, Merle, Tina, Bridgette - the Blueticks, Hollie - the Aussie


Posted by wayne f on 11-18-2009 11:56 PM:

what about akc and ukc what would you like them to do.
akc and ukc provide a service for dog owners/breeders so do vetinarians feed dealer and dog supply should we expect them to do something.
this i believe is a problem of all dog owners and by sticking together by means of support and donations we can defeat these people. not trying to bring politics into this but our leader has given a post to a person that believes animals have the right to sue there owners/caretakers

__________________
the rooster will crow again.. keep them english and keep them looking up
email minihorse@hotmail.com


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:23 PM.
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club