UKC Forums - TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928287758)

Posted by oklared on 12-12-2012 09:47 PM:

TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

I JUST HERD OF A STUDY THAT WAS DONE AND IT SAYS IF WE TAX EVRYONE THAT MAKES 100,000 OR MORE AT THE RATE OF 100% IT WILL NOT COVER WHAT THE USA SPENDS IN A YEAR. SO MAKE THE RICH PAY MORE MMMMMMMMM OR SPEND LESSMMMMMMM

__________________
HOME OF 2010 HIGH SCOREING REDBONE FEMALE, DUAL CH Y2KD, #7 REPRODUCING RED FEMALE
NT.Ch. WINNER AT REDBONE SEC. 2008
3RD PL. NT.CH. 2009 BATTLE OF BREEDS AT ADA OKLA.
4TH PLACE R.Q.E 2010
2ND PLACE OVERALL AT ZONE 4 AND DOUBLE CAST WINNER 2010
WENT TO 2010 WORLD HUNT
AMERICAN REDBONE ASSOCIATION HIGH SCOREING REDBONE FEMALE OF THE 2010 WORLD HUNT
OVERALL HI SCOREING DOG AT 2010 BBCHA BLUE TIC SECTIONAL
GR.NT.CH. AT 12 and A HALF
MADE-EM SEE RED

Posted by Lakeland Kennel on 12-12-2012 11:10 PM:

How many got their money honestly and morally? There certainly has been a lot of worker pension monies that seem to end up in one of these "top money earner's" accounts. I am sure there are some top money earners that have earned their money but there are plenty of worthless managers that mismanage their companies into bankrupcy and then, get bonusses for doing it.

Look at the folks on Wall Street that caused the present reccesion. Do they deserve the money they get? Why shouldn't they pay top taxes?

__________________
Dave Haugh

LAKELAND KENNELS
____________________________
English Coonhounds
____________________________
Gr Ch Lakeland's Phoebe
PKC Sq Ch Lakeland's Mini Mouse
____________________________
Mt Curs
____________________________
Ch SqCh Lakeland's Lucy
SqCh Lakeland's Goldie
SqCh Lakeland's Kate
____________________________
Beagles
____________________________
Dual GrCh Blank's Midnight
GrCh HBCh Lakeland's Cricket II

_______________________________

Posted by shakethevine on 12-12-2012 11:12 PM:

Re: TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

quote:
Originally posted by oklared
I JUST HERD OF A STUDY THAT WAS DONE AND IT SAYS IF WE TAX EVRYONE THAT MAKES 100,000 OR MORE AT THE RATE OF 100% IT WILL NOT COVER WHAT THE USA SPENDS IN A YEAR. SO MAKE THE RICH PAY MORE MMMMMMMMM OR SPEND LESSMMMMMMM

Do Both!!!

__________________
Eric Harter
5102 State Route 800
Dover, Ohio 44622

Cell: 330-763-3225
Email: ericharter40@yahoo.com

Midnight Storm English Kennels
Owner: Eric Harter

Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 12-12-2012 11:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
How many got their money honestly and morally?

Legislating morality? I thought that was a no-no for liberals. I've always wondered how Mr. Obama could say "that's above my pay grade" when asked "when does life begin?", yet is perfectly capable of determining someone's "fair share".

__________________
{TEAM BIBLE THUMPER}

...", nevertheless I am not ashamed, for I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep what I have committed to Him until that Day" - 2 Timothy 1:12

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we can not be trusted with arms for our own defense?" - Patrick Henry

"Those who would give up essential Liberty,to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 12-12-2012 11:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
There certainly has been a lot of worker pension monies that seem to end up in one of these "top money earner's" accounts.

Do you have documentation for that?

Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 12-12-2012 11:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
I am sure there are some top money earners that have earned their money but there are plenty of worthless managers that mismanage their companies into bankrupcy and then, get bonusses for doing it.

Are you suggesting separate tax rates based on money earned ethically verses money earned unethically, instead of being based on level of income? Are you ok with folks being 1%ers if they prove they "earned their money"? What rates do you suggest for each category?

Posted by brushrunretiree on 12-13-2012 12:35 AM:

LAKELAND, HOW MUCH DO WE TAX THE "UNION EXEC'S" THAT EMBEZZLE MILLIONS FROM PENSION ACCOUNTS? HOW MUCH DO WE TAX "UNION EXEC'S" THAT HAVE "SUPER SENIORITY" AND NEVER HIT A LICK, JUST BE ON THE SHOP FLOOR??

Posted by conhtr1 on 12-13-2012 04:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
How many got their money honestly and morally? There certainly has been a lot of worker pension monies that seem to end up in one of these "top money earner's" accounts. I am sure there are some top money earners that have earned their money but there are plenty of worthless managers that mismanage their companies into bankrupcy and then, get bonusses for doing it.

Look at the folks on Wall Street that caused the present reccesion. Do they deserve the money they get? Why shouldn't they pay top taxes?

You sitting up there in Ill. drawing a union pension which invests in WALL STREET.
Also seems like its always the UNION pensions that disappear HMMMMMMMM.

Posted by headless01 on 12-13-2012 05:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Diggerman
Do you have coonhounds or German shepards and carry a white cane?Who the F bailed out the banks and Wall street?How many bonuses were payed out of your leaders stimulus plan?And now the party of baby killers is worried whether money is made "morally"? WTF!

there ya go, they'll run the country in the ground as long as they get they're way.

Posted by Lakeland Kennel on 12-13-2012 09:04 PM:

There is talk about my Union pension funds to be loaned to the city of Chicago to upgrade their infra-structure instead of then borrowing the money from Wall Street. It could be a good deal.

Posted by rance56 on 12-13-2012 10:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lakeland Kennel
There is talk about my Union pension funds to be loaned to the city of Chicago to upgrade their infra-structure instead of then borrowing the money from Wall Street. It could be a good deal.

read this article about where yalls pension is invested. i love the irony of it.

http://washpost.bloomberg.com/Story...5TC1S2UB06I43K1

btw, is the country ills a result of the rich not paying enough taxes? cause you dems sure treat it that way

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Posted by jason2579 on 12-13-2012 10:17 PM:

I would say both Rance. Rich not paying their share and the government not cutting spending. Such as lazy people not getting off their backside and getting some kind of work.

__________________
Jason Davis
641 751 7545
Home of the Iowa River Blueticks
NT CH Bullets Iowa River Squirt
Five star state hunt championship 2nd place
Five star qualifier 1st place win.
Bbcha sectional high scoring male
World hunt qualified 2009
9th place open bluetick reunion
Davis's Iowa River Striker ( Squirt X J and N's Blue Night Sky)

BnJs Sugar Babe.
Hitting the comp hunts 2015

"Whatever works for you"

Posted by BIG$BLUES on 12-14-2012 01:33 AM:

I would settle for them having to pay the same % rate as a middle class worker

__________________
Travis Duvall owned and operated

NTCH DUVALL'S BIG MONEY SLIDDER

Home of those with drive!
Speak the truth it will set you free.

Posted by brushrunretiree on 12-14-2012 02:13 AM:

I'D SAY A FLAT TAX, NO DEDUCTIONS. LET EVERYONE HAVE A DOG IN THE FIGHT. TAKE SOCIAL SECURITY OUT OF ALL INCOME UP TO $200,000. YOU COULD STILL INVEST IN BEFORE AND AFTER TAXES. THAT WOULD, IN MY ESTIMATION, SURE UP A COUPLE OF SYSTEMS. AS FOR MEDICARE, WE NEED SOME WATCH DOG GROUPS TO STOP AND DUE AWAY WITH THE FRAUD IN THE SYSTEM. WHEN AND IF THEY UNCOVER WRONG DOING, BORE THE AUGER. TAKE THE COMPANY OUT OF THEIR CONTROL, AND INSTILL A SENSE OF PRIDE BACK INTO BUSINESS, INSTEAD OF HOSING EVERYONE AND THE GOOD ONES TWICE. GRANTED, EVERY BUSINESS IS NOT UNDERHANDED, BUT THERE ARE SOME THAT NEED WATCHING.

Posted by Hey Preacher!!! on 12-14-2012 03:05 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BIG$BLUES
I would settle for them having to pay the same % rate as a middle class worker

Do away with progressive tax brackets?

Posted by truly on 12-14-2012 06:57 AM:

Re: TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

quote:
Originally posted by oklared
I JUST HERD OF A STUDY THAT WAS DONE AND IT SAYS IF WE TAX EVRYONE THAT MAKES 100,000 OR MORE AT THE RATE OF 100% IT WILL NOT COVER WHAT THE USA SPENDS IN A YEAR. SO MAKE THE RICH PAY MORE MMMMMMMMM OR SPEND LESSMMMMMMM

quote:
Originally posted by Hey Preacher!!!
Do you have documentation for that?

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Posted by john nannemann on 12-14-2012 02:29 PM:

Re: Re: TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

quote:
Originally posted by truly

Re: TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

quote:
Originally posted by oklared
I JUST HERD OF A STUDY THAT WAS DONE AND IT SAYS IF WE TAX EVRYONE THAT MAKES 100,000 OR MORE AT THE RATE OF 100% IT WILL NOT COVER WHAT THE USA SPENDS IN A YEAR. SO MAKE THE RICH PAY MORE MMMMMMMMM OR SPEND LESSMMMMMMM

quote:
Originally posted by Hey Preacher!!!
Do you have documentation for that?

oh benny, you just chopping at the bit for some EXPROPRIATION, ain't ya. so sad you weren't around in 1920 russia. itch, itch, itching to give somebody a HAIRCUT. to bad the democommies policies are ACTUALLY facilitating the expropriation from the middle to the top. i suppose you'll never understand relativity extends to the economy and wealth distribution just like physics.

but anyhoo, been thinking, trying to use commiecrat mislogic - i have a plan for the deficit reduction. there are about 300 million people in the US. i'd guess about 250 million of them go to get regular hair cuts, and i think we can all agree that a haircut is really not a necessity, but a luxury. the deficit is just over a trillion a year, which i think is a thousand billion. 4 times 250million is a billion. so now we need that thousand billion, don't we. so we add a haircut tax!!! i mean, pretty much everybody has hair if some sort, so it's dang near perfect. the haircut tax would be about $400 per haircut(assuming the average person gets 10 hair cuts per year). as from what i have been able to ascertain from this board over the years, the tonsorial artists(barbers) generally tend to be left leaning at the least, and full blown communists in some cases, so they would be more then happy to be the unpaid tax collectors of the above proposed tax, you know, just for the thrill of expropriation.
but, you say, some people wouldn't pay that for a haircut, so it won't necessarily produce the needed revenue. but, you also say, some folks make their living giving haircuts and when people won't pay that for them so they won't be able to make a living. ah, to hell with that too. remember, i'm using commiecrat mislogic here, with their totalitarian bent- if they try to avoid going and getting the haircut to avoid the tax(if they go buy a flobee or something, maybe go crystal gayle), we can pass and law or make a regulation that MANDATES they get at least 10 haircuts per year or face jail or a fine equal to what the taxes($4000) would be on the said 10 haircuts. or how about a one time purchase tax of about 4000 dollars on the flobee, or even razors if they try to go bald, with an annual "personal hair care property tax" for owning the said hair care device of 4000 dollars a year, thereby making there be no advantage of doing it yourself so the barbers can still be "busy, busy".

i could go on and on playing the "unintended consequences" game , round and round, but why. just go for it without any forethought like the commiecrats do. say at least we "did" something, "progressed" so to speak, and then we'll deal with and "progress" from there in the future.

the world of directed mandates, selective laws, arbitrary decisions, ain't it sweet.

hey benny, your philosophical soulmate, old harry belafonte, i understand said bo should just "lock up" all the dissenters to the commie movement. didn't i say it would come down to that, it ALWAYS has- historically. harry just saying what's always going through the "little dictators" heads. i suppose your ready for that also- those of us unfit or unwilling to become "communist man" to be subjugated, relegated, and eliminated.
when you want to send them out for me, pm me for the address. please, for my own amusement, send stewart smalley down at the head of the squad.

ciao and toodles

V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V

__________________
"it's easy to sit there and say you'd like to have more money. and i guess that's what i like about it. it's easy. just sitting there, rocking back and forth, wanting that money."
Jack Handy

Posted by oklared on 12-14-2012 05:48 PM:

Re: Re: TAXING THE TOP MONEY MAKERS

quote:
Originally posted by truly

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012...t_spending.html

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page