UKC Forums Pages (7): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »
Show all 152 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Another dandy scoring question (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=78098)


Posted by Tim moore on 01-18-2006 08:33 PM:

scoring question #2

Since rule 3.d states that a dog shut out on strike will not receive plus or minus track unless he ends up on another tree. Answer this.

3 dog cast. Mo. State finals.

Dogs A and B on leash leaving a scored tree. Dog C opens and we cut dogs A and B. Dog C is treed right before dogs A and B are struck. Dog A goes on and dog B trees with dog C. Coon is seen and plussed. Score now is dog A 525+ no minus dog B 500+ no minus and C is losing bad. We lead away from tree to cut to dog A who is carrying 25 strike with a line under it. 9 minutes left in the hunt and we don't hear dog A. We put the eight on him and it gets him. Hunts over. Who wins?


Posted by on 01-18-2006 08:38 PM:

Dog A never had his 25 strike deleted because never covered the tree that shut him out. The 8 caught him, he takes 25 minus. Now dog A has 500+ with 25 minus. Dog B has 500+, no minus. The first tie breaker is minus points. Dog B wins the cast.


Posted by TN-steve on 01-18-2006 08:48 PM:

thats the way i see it jim


Posted by on 01-18-2006 08:51 PM:

Gotta be a catch somewhere, that was too easy.


Posted by TN-steve on 01-18-2006 08:57 PM:

yea ever time i think i'm getting something wright BAM it gets me


Posted by berger on 01-18-2006 09:00 PM:

The catch

Dog B & C get scratched they didn't turn loose in that last minute. A wins with 525+ 25- =500+cw

Otherwise Jim is correct.

__________________
Tree Jar'n Black and Tans
Home of Tree Jar'n Coonhound Kennels


319-201-8445


Posted by on 01-18-2006 09:03 PM:

Not too sure about that Berger. One minute left.... I think you can, within the rules, walk that long before cutting the dogs. Is walking off the last 15 minutes against the rules?


Posted by TN-steve on 01-18-2006 09:06 PM:

b,c were on trail was'nt they,,if they never opened and time gets them b would win


Posted by TN-steve on 01-18-2006 09:09 PM:

the eight gets dog A not B and C


Posted by on 01-18-2006 09:12 PM:

Steve, I don't think B & C were recast because they had to run the 8 on A. Dog A got caight by the 8. Now with one minute left to hunt, B & C must recast unless the cast chooses to walk a minute before casting in which case the hunt ends before dogs B & C can be recast.


Posted by old joe on 01-19-2006 02:36 AM:

one more kink

if dog A and B were on lead, dog C could not be struck for 100 points because all dogs must be off lead competeing for strike.


Posted by CHRIS SUTTON on 01-19-2006 06:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
Dog A never had his 25 strike deleted because never covered the tree that shut him out. The 8 caught him, he takes 25 minus. Now dog A has 500+ with 25 minus. Dog B has 500+, no minus. The first tie breaker is minus points. Dog B wins the cast.
facts


Posted by Tim moore on 01-19-2006 03:01 PM:

Rule v/s Rule

I agree that if the dog doesn't bark on track in 8 minutes it should be minused according to rule 4 e. But if you look at rule 3 d. its says exactly this. (Dog cannot receive plus or minuse points if he is not on trail when first dog is declared treed unless he trees on seperate tree.) Does rule 4 e. override rule 3 d.? If so, how do you know that? Dog A never treed on seperate tree or on closed tree. So he is carrying 25 strike with a line under it. It doesn't say in the rules what to do with the strike points unless the dog ends up on the closed tree or a seperate tree. All it says is dog cannot receive plus or minus unless.... According to rule 3 d. you cannot minuse this dog on strike.

Tim


Posted by PatrickRobinson on 01-19-2006 03:13 PM:

Jim had it right the first time. You guys need to read the rules for what they are and not put in extra items to confuse yourself. Good answer Jim.


Posted by Hump on 01-19-2006 03:44 PM:

Re: Rule v/s Rule

quote:
Originally posted by Tim moore
So he is carrying 25 strike with a line under it. It doesn't say in the rules what to do with the strike points unless the dog ends up on the closed tree or a seperate tree.



Hmmmm...


Posted by on 01-19-2006 04:09 PM:

When you put a line under those strike points, it is to remind the judge that the dogs strike will be deleted if that dog covers the dog that shut him out. If the dog does anything other than cover the dog that shut him out, his strike points are scored as if the line under wasn't there.


Posted by Tim moore on 01-19-2006 04:17 PM:

Jim

The rules don't say that. The rule say's he can't be plussed or minused unless........

Tim


Posted by on 01-19-2006 04:19 PM:

Tim, I take it you were handling dog A. I have seen some purty creative ways of trying to get out of a well earned minus. This is one of them.


Posted by Tim moore on 01-19-2006 05:54 PM:

Jim

Actually I won with Dog B. And I am not arguing the point that the dog should be minused. It is when I was walking the three miles back to the truck that night that I got to thinking about this. If you tell me that rule 4 e. will over ride rule 3 d. in all these situations, I'm on board. However, it doesn't say that anywhere. I do believe this is a situation where UKC may want to look at rule 3 d. and revise it a little. Everyone says go by the rules. If you do that, according to 3 d. YOU CAN'T MINUS DOG A

Tim


Posted by Rip on 01-19-2006 06:09 PM:

Actually this is what happens sometimes when re writing rules. It has unintended consequences or sometimes fails to fix previous unintended consequences. A dog struck after the others tree has always had this loophole, and it would have been nice if the re-write were to have fixed it, but it didn't.

According to the way rules are, 3d wins out because it specifically tells you what to do in that specific situation. Basically the dog has to actually make a tree somewhere for those strike points to be eligible for scoring.

I don't like it, but as the rules read right now that's is what must happen because the rule is specific and applies for that situation.

UKC will have to come out with a specific advisor to say different in order for those points to be scored. They could also ammend the wording of the rule to say "if dog does not make a tree refer to rule 4.

__________________
Let's go huntin


Posted by Hump on 01-19-2006 06:09 PM:

3. POINTS WILL BE PLUS:

d. Dog cannot receive plus or minus strike points if he is not on trail when first dog is declared treed unless he trees on separate tree. However, he may receive tree points if he trees within five minutes. Dogs that strike must be declared struck and recorded by Judge.


JiM, while I agree that the intent of the rule is to make the strike good with the exception of at a pre-declared tree, but the language is there in the rule for what Tim is saying. There is no specification that the plus or minus points are related to treeing.

That said, and you would never get it past a moh.


Posted by Tim moore on 01-20-2006 12:09 PM:

UKC

Would one of you people at UKC answer this?


Posted by Tim moore on 01-20-2006 06:38 PM:

tim

tim


Posted by jawscardodger on 10-09-2006 04:20 PM:

ukc???


Posted by larrypoe on 10-09-2006 05:24 PM:

The line, like Jim said, is to remind the judge of the shut out. As soon as it was clear the dog wasnt at the shut out tree, the line is removed. He is then in for 25 good or bad.

I also saw somewhere where it was said not to draw the line under it, but wait till it was clear the dog was shut out and then draw the line threw it. Something about not scribbling up the card.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 AM. Pages (7): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »
Show all 152 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club