UKC Forums Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 83 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Obama/Blagoveich Discussion (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=244835)


Posted by elvis on 12-20-2008 11:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Nelson Kirkland
He has about as much of a chance to take our guns as the republicans have at reversing Roe v Wade. Nobody needs a gun that shoots 60 rounds per minute that is not in military uniform.


you may change your mind when they send those uniforms to take your single shot away.
the second ammendment was not written to insure we had a way to kill supper, it was written so that we the people could take this country back from a corrupt goverment if the need arose.


Posted by John Wittenborn on 12-20-2008 11:34 PM:

trackdriver,

I have not seen you on here lately, thought maybe you were CAMPED OUT in D.C. waiting on the BIG PARTY, LOL????????????????

__________________
John

CUTLER, AMERICA

Good judgement, is something that you get from using bad judgement.--Will Rogers


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 11:36 PM:

the reference to mrs. obama is the gov. of il. stating that his wife is more qualified to serve on private boards than mrs. obama who he states has no experience in the private sector and she should have the opportunity to do so and reap the rewards that have fallen to mrs. obama... that is what is in the fbi statement about mrs. obama... now no doubt being the wife of a senator has perks, she is also v.p. of chicago hospitals inc. which pays 271,000 plus per yr., is an attorney, the board mentioned is a vendor of walmart pays 51,000 per plus stock options, unfortunately commonplace in our political system, not just found in illinois, need to get this kinda stuff out of the process and have elected officals beholding to the public and not vested interests as is the case now, not a party or state issue, but the way things are in u.s. politics....


Posted by Merritt Rice on 12-20-2008 11:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Nelson Kirkland
He has about as much of a chance to take our guns as the republicans have at reversing Roe v Wade. Nobody needs a gun that shoots 60 rounds per minute that is not in military uniform.


You obviously don't understand the second ammendment. The right to bear arms has nothing to do with hunting. It has everything to do with the people being able to rise up against a tyrannical government that tries to take away our freedom. If I might have to take arms up against the government then i want to be as well armed if possible. my friend if you give these liberals an inch they will take a mile. Please do not under estimate their agenda. They have already taken over the banking, insurance and auto industries right under our noses using the code word bail out and deprssion. Obama has already said he will raise ammunition taxes 500 %. What will that do to the gun industry? It will bankrupt them and the liberals will have taken our rights without having to change the constitution. It is a brilliant idea. I am of the opinion that if you are a law abiding american citizen then you should be able to purchase and own any firearm you can afford to own whether it be an M-60 or a .50 cal sniper rifle. A lot of people own AR-15's for protection and for sport. Just because you don't see any reason to own a weapon with that type of capability doesn't mean the rest of us don't. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN OUR LIVES.


Posted by rrs on 12-21-2008 12:06 AM:

agree with what mr. rice has to say about firearms ownership, not about the liberal take over of banking, insurance, auto, believe the Bush administration is still in charge and has impemented bailout etc... don't think liberals are in control of most big business-corporate entities, but back to the original firearms issue, the antis are not going to be content with just some forms of regulation, their bottom line is the elimination of private ownership of all guns, method is to chip away, little at a time, assault weapons, big magazine handguns, on and on, need to be vigilant and not become complacent, the antis are banking on the idea that some gun owners will not worry about guns they do not feel the need for, the 1st step toward disarming the private citizen, won't happen overnight, remember an inactive-apathetic majority can-is often controlled by an active minority...


Posted by rrs on 12-21-2008 03:17 PM:

important to be active in support of constitutional right to private ownership of firearms, contact those in congress to make your thoughts known, if not an nra member join, the anti forces are always activists, gun supporters must be the same.....


Posted by trackdriver on 12-21-2008 03:52 PM:

Re: trackdriver,

quote:
Originally posted by John Wittenborn
I have not seen you on here lately, thought maybe you were CAMPED OUT in D.C. waiting on the BIG PARTY, LOL???????????????? Naw John just been coon hunting like i should have been doing the election. No d.c. for me.

__________________
Never forget Never surrender.... The red white and blue!


Posted by liberalcreek on 12-21-2008 04:40 PM:

From another site..


With the recent news that the military is being used to "help" in domestic law enforcement, flagrantly in violation of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, the increasing federalization and militarization of local police, the simultaneous introduction of encoded ammunition bills into state legislatures, and a host of other events and legislation portending government attempts at widespread gun confiscation, I thought it would be a good time to reacquaint people with the Combat Arms Survey given to Marines at the 29 Palms Marine Base in California in 1994.

The survey was designed to gauge Marines' willingness to serve under foreign commanders and also to gauge their willingness to fire on Americans who resisted government efforts to confiscate their firearms.

The final question, #46, was worded as follows:

“The US government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I would fire upon US citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the US government.”

Below are links to the entire survey and to a recent blog post by William Norman Grigg which describes the survey and its ramifications much better than I can.

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/419.html

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.co...-revisited.html

__________________
Nuthin' like a coon treed on Liberal Creek


Posted by rance56 on 12-22-2008 03:04 PM:

still waiting for ONE, thats right just ONE, crediable article on the "several" republicans in obamas cabinet. if this claim you made was true, surely there would be atleast ONE article discussing something this newsworthy?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-22-2008 04:10 PM:

rance,
let go brother, even conservative talk radio has supported the obama cabinet picks... once again, than no more, several is more than one, sorry if my definition does not meet your criteria what ever that is... congressman ray lahood as sec. of transportation, 7 terms in the house, a republican, know him as well, from peoria, il..., Sec. of Defense Gates-hold over from the Bush administration, and I stated the two military gentleman lean toward the gop, nat. security, vet. affairs, many go through life looking, but rarely seeing... like said before will agree with anything you like just to make you feel better and give you some feeling of winning-being right if that is so important to you.... bottom line obama is going to be the president if you like it or not... have a great christmas and wondeful new yrs... hey looks like at the moment, franken a demo ,is going to be the winner in mn.,, hope whover it is there actually got the most votes....


Posted by Bill(Chew) on 12-22-2008 05:00 PM:

rrs, can you not just say "Yes" or "No" to a simple question? I'm not saying you are wrong in what you are saying, I hope that you are right. That said, you were asked a simple question that you could have answered with a simple yes or no and you have refused.

Are you a politition?

__________________
Bill Harper
Washington, NC
252-944-5592


Posted by rrs on 12-22-2008 06:41 PM:

have read quite a few articles about obama app'ts..., look at poltical base.com, it has a comprehensive list of appointments.... believe should have said obama appointments and not just cabinet as national security-vet. affairs are not actual cabinet positions... my contention was-is that obama appointments are diverse in makeup with some being republican, mentioned them several times, also that believe much more important what is inside a box than the box itself... not sure what a yes or no answer would be to, bottom line a diverse group of rather moderate appointees which does include some republicans, seems like the contention is the meaning of several, which I take tpo mean more than 1, less than many.... there are lots of articles that have talked about the obama appointments... again, will agree to be wrong if that makes some happy, by the way never advocated for-against, just that the appointments are moderate types and diverse with some being republican or with gop tendancy... all done, no more, have said all can say, believe whatever you choose, life goes on, hope the new president is able to lead-move us all forward regardless of party affiliation, move beyond partisnaship and do what needs to be done for the good of the whole nation... guess time will tell....


Posted by perry co cooner on 12-22-2008 08:17 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by liberalcreek



I was always taught you are known by the company you keep.



This has to be a true statement because my parents told me that 100 times while I was growing up!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
Al Tarantella


Posted by liberalcreek on 12-22-2008 08:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
rance,
let go brother, even conservative talk radio has supported the obama cabinet picks...



LOL!!! Lies, lies, and more lies.

__________________
Nuthin' like a coon treed on Liberal Creek


Posted by liberalcreek on 12-22-2008 08:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bill(Chew)
rrs, can you not just say "Yes" or "No" to a simple question? I'm not saying you are wrong in what you are saying, I hope that you are right. That said, you were asked a simple question that you could have answered with a simple yes or no and you have refused.

Are you a politition?



No, He is a "fence straddler","Luke warm", "etc, etc.

He is the king of ambiguous posts. Which isn't a bad thing. just frustrating to try and figure out what he really believes.

__________________
Nuthin' like a coon treed on Liberal Creek


Posted by capt_agricultur on 12-23-2008 12:14 AM:

Obamas presidency will be shorter than JFK


Posted by rance56 on 12-23-2008 12:41 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
have read quite a few articles about obama app'ts...,


ok, well sense you read several, post a link to a specific ONE that talks on the subject of several republicans in obamas cabinet.

again, no one is arguing wether this is a moderate cabinet or not, its about your statement of there being several republicans in it and the subsequent tap dancing around the comment when you was called out on it. things like this linger on when you wont give a straight answer.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-23-2008 12:55 AM:

like said 2 republicans, 2 that tend to be gop types, to me that is several, same information in every source that I have read, left or right leaning sources, or middle of the road report the same....


Posted by rrs on 12-23-2008 01:01 AM:

already did post, politicalbase.com is one, but are many that basically say the same thing, cnn, yahoo, many major newspapers as well, sure there are numerous sites as well that I have not read or seen, a cornicupia of sites to select from....


Posted by rance56 on 12-23-2008 01:06 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
like said 2 republicans, 2 that tend to be gop types, to me that is several, same information in every source that I have read, left or right leaning sources, or middle of the road report the same....


originally you said there were 4 republicans, now there are only 2 republicans.

and just what makes someone tend to be gop type, how do you know the 2 that you mentioned fit this mold, and does that make them republicans?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-23-2008 01:08 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
already did post, politicalbase.com is one, but are many that basically say the same thing, cnn, yahoo, many major newspapers as well, sure there are numerous sites as well that I have not read or seen, a cornicupia of sites to select from....


my god, can you tell the truth? you posted a link to a website, not a link to an article referencing several republicans in obamas cabinet.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by oscar on 12-23-2008 01:24 AM:

rance, how do you know it dont make them a rep. Its just your opinion just like its his opinion on what he says. Doesnt matter if he wont give a straight answer or not hes not on the cabinet and wont be making any critical decisions.LOL Like was stated before your beating a dead horse MOVE ON this country needs to .


Posted by rrs on 12-23-2008 01:27 AM:

rance,
get off of it brother, sorry if you have to navigate to the specific article, does name calling make you feel better-must... never said 4, but several, did say that the two military gentleman tended to be more in line with gop ideals than not, you know that my intent was never about labels-affiliation, more about ability to perform... you will never be satisfied period and will always find something to be negative about... sorry can't do whatever it is that you want, but if did than you could not call people liars, etc... name calling is a real mark of intelligence... again, as always respect your thoughts-ideas, will not call you names, be negative, but no sense trying to ride a dead horse, you have already mounted and rode it to death... have a great christmas and wonderful new yr....


Posted by rance56 on 12-23-2008 02:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
rance,
get off of it brother, sorry if you have to navigate to the specific article, does name calling make you feel better-must... never said 4, but several, did say that the two military gentleman tended to be more in line with gop ideals than not, you know that my intent was never about labels-affiliation, more about ability to perform... you will never be satisfied period and will always find something to be negative about... sorry can't do whatever it is that you want, but if did than you could not call people liars, etc... name calling is a real mark of intelligence... again, as always respect your thoughts-ideas, will not call you names, be negative, but no sense trying to ride a dead horse, you have already mounted and rode it to death... have a great christmas and wonderful new yr....



dont go trying to put words in my mouth, i asked if the truth was in you, didnt not call you anything. the fact of the matter is, its a very easy yes or no asnwer to this question. ive read numerous articles on the subject, they all say 2 republicans at most, none say more than that as several. heres my proof and will continue to post more, its just such a falsehood to keep claiming there are 4 republicans in obamas cabinet or several for that matter, and you still wont live up to you were categorically wrong or lieing.

http://www.welt.de/english-news/art...orful-ever.html

read 5th paragraph up from the bottom. more to come

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-23-2008 02:11 AM:

here is another link with

http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_11279236

here is the exact paragraph, its somewhat far down.

The Cabinet nominees are a fairly diverse lot. There are five women, if one includes Jackson and Susan Rice, the nominee for U.N. ambassador, whose positions Obama considers Cabinet-rank. (Also named yesterday to head the sub-Cabinet Small Business Administration was Karen Mills, a Maine businesswoman.) There are three Lationos, four blacks two Republicans - Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Ray LaHood, a retiring Illinois congressman who was named yesterday to be secretary of transportation.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 AM. Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 83 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club