UKC Forums - And your 2008 NFC NORTH Champions

Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »
Show all 142 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- And your 2008 NFC NORTH Champions (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=241775)

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-24-2008 12:33 AM:

Vikes should of won against the falcons
Packers should of beat the bears
buttttt neither of them won..... soooo that =
the bears as your 2008 nfc north champs! lol.

__________________
Brandon Becker
1-507-236-0328
Beckers River Bottom Kennels:

NiteCh Ch'PR' C&Ts Makin it Rain Hundo's

****RIP****
*GrNiteChGrCh"PR"S-N-B's Stylish Rebel
**GrNiteCh'PR' The Lady Jade
**GrNite Ch'PR' Stylish Super Sally
*Nite Ch'PR' Beckers Buckeye Wild Maxx
*NiteCh'PR' Beckers Tree Time Tom

Posted by banjo on 12-24-2008 03:05 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bbecker09
Vikes should of won against the falcons
Packers should of beat the bears
buttttt neither of them won..... soooo that =
the bears as your 2008 nfc north champs! lol.

If I was a Packer fan I certainly wouldnt be 'lol' if the Bears or the Vikings are the North champs.

Then again,by rooting against the Pack last night you proved your not a real Packers fan anyway.

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-24-2008 03:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by banjo
If I was a Packer fan I certainly wouldnt be 'lol' if the Bears or the Vikings are the North champs.

Then again,by rooting against the Pack last night you proved your not a real Packers fan anyway.

Dont question my 'packerhood' or ill have to question your 'manhood'

haha. Its okay i figure its time for someone else to win the division no one stays consistent through the last two decades like the packers in our division tho so im fine with that

Posted by banjo on 12-24-2008 03:23 AM:

I think it was you rooting for the Bears against the Packers.

I didnt question it,you did.

Its understood why you did so,but thats something I couldnt have done if I was a Packer fan.

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-24-2008 07:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by banjo
I think it was you rooting for the Bears against the Packers.

I didnt question it,you did.

Its understood why you did so,but thats something I couldnt have done if I was a Packer fan.

Oh the closer it got to kickoff the more i talked myself out of rooting for the pack. Honestly i think it was one of rodgers best games especially considering it was in sub zero temps. Took a lot of good out of that game headed into next year.

Posted by MikeO on 12-24-2008 07:26 PM:

the only way the pack is getting back on top anytime soon is to beg #4 to comeback. mike mcarthy was to stubborn to see what he had he should be fired! m.m will never take the pack anywhere. this year was the beginning of the end of the pack dominating the north division. with #4 gone the pack is a below average team with good talent and a bad coach.

what kind of an idiot lets a hall of fame QB that's still good and probably the best leader in NFL history go?

__________________
Home of these Hamilton county treeing walkers.
GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' OWEN'S STYLISH NOCTURNAL SHAKER.
And the pup 'pr' Owen's Rock River Ace...

Mike Owen owner/handler. hunting in style (WALKER STYLE)

Posted by banjo on 12-24-2008 10:08 PM:

I thought Aaron Rodgers looked very good vs the Bears.

Really,the entire team did except the kicker and the entire field goal unit.I thought bot missed field goals were kicked to low for the distance.The Bears got to much push as well.

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-25-2008 05:55 AM:

Rodgers is doing a real fine job this year, its our defense that is losing us most of our games. As much as i love him Mr. Favre isnt looking to great this year away from his 6 td game.

Posted by MikeO on 12-25-2008 07:06 AM:

now that's a stretch becker. but if that's what helps you cheese heads deal with losing #4 so be it. lol

FIRE M.M now before its to late!!!!!!

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-25-2008 05:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MikeO
now that's a stretch becker. but if that's what helps you cheese heads deal with losing #4 so be it. lol

FIRE M.M now before its to late!!!!!!

Im in the middle on mccarthy.. i think this year we will cut our d.c. and give mccarthy another year with a more legit d.c. and see how it goes...

Posted by MikeO on 12-25-2008 05:57 PM:

so your saying even with favre they wouldn't have made the playoffs? a great leader like favre is PRICELESS.

that's alright though at least my stinking bears have a shot now. lol

Posted by Mike B on 12-25-2008 07:33 PM:

quote:
[i]

what kind of an idiot lets a hall of fame QB that's still good and probably the best leader in NFL history go? [/B]

TED THOMPSON !!!

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-26-2008 12:12 AM:

Rodgers- 3,730 yards, 25 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, 91.4 rating, 208 Rush yds, 4 rush td's

Favre- 3,239 yards, 21 touchdowns, 19 interceptions, 84 rating, 42 Rush yds, 1 rush td
Defense and special teams are why our record is 5-10. Rodgers is the least of our worries hes been a top 10 quarterback all season and at times shown he can be one of the best.

Posted by MikeO on 12-26-2008 04:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by bbecker09
Rodgers- 3,730 yards, 25 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, 91.4 rating, 208 Rush yds, 4 rush td's

Favre- 3,239 yards, 21 touchdowns, 19 interceptions, 84 rating, 42 Rush yds, 1 rush td
Defense and special teams are why our record is 5-10. Rodgers is the least of our worries hes been a top 10 quarterback all season and at times shown he can be one of the best.

the numbers aren't in question LEADERSHIP is what the pack lost. #4 made his team better. the pack lost favre and got worse the jets got favre and got better.

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-26-2008 07:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MikeO
the numbers aren't in question LEADERSHIP is what the pack lost. #4 made his team better. the pack lost favre and got worse the jets got favre and got better.

the jets also added several players,spending a lot of money. Leadership=blah blah blah does favre make the defense better? nuff said on that.

Posted by MikeO on 12-26-2008 07:39 PM:

the argument can be made that favre made the whole team better, even the defense. with favre i think the pack wins alot of those close games and wouldn't have taken that beat down a few weeks ago plus they make the playoffs.

stats (papers) can look great but without the will to win (heart) they mean very little.

Posted by banjo on 12-28-2008 09:08 PM:

SKOL VIKINGS!

NFC North champs

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by MikeO on 12-28-2008 09:11 PM:

/.;'[,./,. stinking bears!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by banjo on 12-28-2008 09:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MikeO
/.;'[,./,. stinking bears!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought for sure the Bears would win when they went up 10-0

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by MikeO on 12-28-2008 09:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by banjo
I thought for sure the Bears would win when they went up 10-0

yeah, me to. they cant help themselves their destined to suck forever.

Posted by banjo on 12-29-2008 12:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bbecker09
Name the price.

If Minnesota wins the NFC North I Owe Banjo _____a picture of myself in a Packer Jersey,posted on this thread,holding a L(for loser)on my forehead.This will be shaped out with my thumb and index finger_____________.

Signed: Brandon Becker

__________________
www.cooners.com

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-29-2008 02:12 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by banjo

youll get your pic, ya got me on this one! lol

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-29-2008 02:30 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MikeO
the argument can be made that favre made the whole team better, even the defense. with favre i think the pack wins alot of those close games and wouldn't have taken that beat down a few weeks ago plus they make the playoffs.

stats (papers) can look great but without the will to win (heart) they mean very little.

How bout that leader, good ol favre 3ints in a big game..

Rodgers- 4048 yards, 28 tds, 13 int
Favre- 3472 yards, 22 td, 22 int

Is 'leadership' really overcome that big of a stat difference? Remember rodgers was in his 'rookie' year as a starter, only the second qb in their first year starting to go over 4000 passing yards, pretty impressive. Give that guy a solid front 7 on the defense and your gonna see super bowl rings for the pack.

Posted by smokey7 on 12-29-2008 02:41 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bbecker09
How bout that leader, good ol favre 3ints in a big game..

Rodgers- 4048 yards, 28 tds, 13 int
Favre- 3472 yards, 22 td, 22 int

Is 'leadership' really overcome that big of a stat difference? Remember rodgers was in his 'rookie' year as a starter, only the second qb in their first year starting to go over 4000 passing yards, pretty impressive. Give that guy a solid front 7 on the defense and your gonna see super bowl rings for the pack.

he's 39 years old and there's something wrong with his shoulder. I'm a Falcons fan, not a packers fan, but even I'll say that Favre is one of the best of all time.

__________________
Home of.........

Baldwin's Blue Princess

and

Baldwin's Blue Texas

In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
-- Mark Twain

Posted by bbecker09 on 12-29-2008 04:01 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by smokey7
he's 39 years old and there's something wrong with his shoulder. I'm a Falcons fan, not a packers fan, but even I'll say that Favre is one of the best of all time.

Somethin wrong with his shoulder? Remember who played from week 4 on with a seperated shoulder that is going to need surgery now in the offseason.. blah blah flat out going with rodgers was the best choice for the team. And thats coming from someone whose hero is brett favre!!

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 AM.

Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »
Show all 142 posts from this thread on one page