UKC Forums Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 73 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=)
-- Judges and Standards (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=100641)


Posted by FlairTFTs on 08-02-2007 07:16 PM:

DQ - Champion

I have a Dalmatian that had a DQ fault, was shown by the breeder/owner, and finished at 15 months. This dog was shown all AKC. He won sweeps and other nice classes. I heard many times that even though he had a DQ fault, overall he was a great specimen for the breed. His DQ was the inside of his right nostril had a speck of missing pigment. Why place a dog that has horrible movement or sloppy topline if only a spec of pigment is missing?

__________________
Kim Rowley
Charleston, West Virginia
AKC CH/ UKC GR CH 'PR' Flair's Lil' Bro "Eli"


Posted by FlairTFTs on 08-02-2007 07:33 PM:

Professional Hander

What do you consider a Professional Handler?

I've been told it is someone that is paid to show someone's dog. I've also been told that it is someone that when they show a dog, any breed, can hide their faults well and still win.

__________________
Kim Rowley
Charleston, West Virginia
AKC CH/ UKC GR CH 'PR' Flair's Lil' Bro "Eli"


Posted by U-Keesie on 08-02-2007 08:52 PM:

Conformation is for Ideal Specimens

O.K. I'm still naive when it comes to conformation. Too many YeahBut dogs. My $150 classified ad pup fit the standard, as did his siblings. Dogs being shown in conformation--labeled CHAMPIONS and worthy of breeding--ought to at least be that good. In 4-H, projects less than ideal used to get red or white ribbons.


Posted by rosebud81592 on 08-02-2007 09:01 PM:

Actually, missing pigment on a Dal's nose is not a DQ, it is a major fault in the AKC. In the UKC, it would be considered a 'serious fault'.

'AKC Dalmation standard reads: The nose is completely pigmented on the leather, black in black-spotted dogs and brown in liver-spotted dogs. Incomplete nose pigmentation is a major fault.'

Linda Rusinko
Wooster, Ohio


Posted by FlairTFTs on 08-03-2007 09:47 PM:

Dalmatian DQ

Linda you are correct it's not a DQ but a major fault. Sorry about the incorrect usage of language. Thanks for checking me on that.

__________________
Kim Rowley
Charleston, West Virginia
AKC CH/ UKC GR CH 'PR' Flair's Lil' Bro "Eli"


Posted by BlackStar on 08-07-2007 02:51 PM:

judges and standards

They should make the requirements to be a judge harder and only approve for each breed individually. They should require that each breed has a representative (like the parent clubs in AKC) has to "sign-off" a judge candidate or up the length of time a person has to have been a breeder in the breed which he has applied.

I know there are ways around all of it, but at least they could try!

Yes, I agree-the folks at AKC only think of UKC as existing for the hunting breeds! The show people need to have more structure to draw more competition for better bred dogs.


Posted by VintageKennel on 08-07-2007 11:06 PM:

Re: judges and standards

quote:
Originally posted by BlackStar
They should make the requirements to be a judge harder and only approve for each breed individually. They should require that each breed has a representative (like the parent clubs in AKC) has to "sign-off" a judge candidate or up the length of time a person has to have been a breeder in the breed which he has applied.

I know there are ways around all of it, but at least they could try!



This is a license for disaster. That is way too many hands in the pot. Can you name any all breed judge any where that has breed EVERY SINGLE BREED they are licensed for? Now, that is a bit outrageous and a true definition of a puppy mill! LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by BlackStar
Yes, I agree-the folks at AKC only think of UKC as existing for the hunting breeds! The show people need to have more structure to draw more competition for better bred dogs.


I resent that! Check out the pedigree on my dogs and I will just about bet the farm that most of mine have a truly "better" 7 generation pedigree than any of yours! My dogs come from some of the truly greatest UKC dogs of all time and can be counted as some of the greatest accomplished show dogs around. Heck, even my AKC dogs (who are shown in UKC as well) have superior pedigrees! Are you saying UKC doesn't have well-bred dogs? How presumptious of you to think that only well-bred dogs win. We all know other registries are littered with pet champions.

Valerie

__________________
Vintage Kennel - Defining the Total Dog
Promoting Responsible and Respectable Dog Ownership by Example
Home of:
Multi-BAIMBS Multi-BISV RBISV Int'l Ch UWPCH 'PR' Arkay's Vintage Dream On CGC TT 1/21/94-5/17/09

Multi BIMBS Multi RBIMBS Multi TD Int'l Ch Nat'l Ch Ehren Ch in Bronze URO3 FO UWPS UGWPC1 UGRACH UCD GRCH 'PR' Marauders Klickitat of Vintage TT CGC TDI
**UKC's first triple Grand Champion in events open to all breeds**

Multi BIMBS Multi RBIMS Multi TDMulti BAIMBS AKC Ch Int'l Ch RATM UGNJCH CAX URO3 UAG11 FO UCD UWPS UGWPC1 GRCH Alpine's Vintage Power Trip RN CD RATI RATM ROH CGCA TDI TT
***UKC's second triple Grand Champion in events open to all breeds.

AKC Ch Multi BIMBS RATN GRCH Alpine's Brownie Bottom Sundae RATI RATN

Multi BIMBS Multi RBIMBS Multi TD Multi 2 X Gateway RBTDIS RATO GNJCH USRCH URO1 UWPO UFRCH CAX UGWPCH GRCH 5Star VNTG History In The Makin CGC RATI RATO
*****UKC's 3rd triple Grand Champion in events open to all breeds******


Multi TD UWPV UWPCH GRCH WMK Little Oak's Kodyak@VNTG CGCA

Multi TD BIMBS CH UWP Alpine's Hearts On Fire CGCA

Multi BIMBS RBIMBS Multi TD UWPS UWPCHX GRCH 'PR' Miakodas Vintage MDNT Marauder DNA-P CGC TT

Multi TD UWPS GRCH UWPCHX 'PR' Miakodas AboveNBeyond of JoLib CGC TDI


Multi BIMBS Multi RBIMBS AKC Ch GRCH Alpine's CoCo Chanel

AKC Ch RATN CH Alpine's Jaimaca Me Crazy RN CGC RATN

Multi BIS BISS AKC GCh Multi TD Multi BIMBS Multi RBIMBS PT1 UNJ UWPV RATM UWPCH GRCH Alpine's Ring of Fire CGCA RATI RATM
**** Winner of the 2013 Top Ten Invitational Premier 2014*********
+++++++Winner of the 2014 Premier Best Total Dog In Show++++++++

MULTI BIS MULTI BISS AKC GCh RATN Alpine's Highwayman CGC RATI RATN

BIMBS AKC Ch UWP GRCH Hilltop's King Cobra CGC TT CD ROH

*Disclaimer: All AKC Ch are owned in AKC by or with Karen and Ed Thomason


Posted by grendslori on 08-09-2007 02:06 PM:

Re: judges and standards

quote:
Originally posted by BlackStar
They should make the requirements to be a judge harder and only approve for each breed individually. They should require that each breed has a representative (like the parent clubs in AKC) has to "sign-off" a judge candidate or up the length of time a person has to have been a breeder in the breed which he has applied.

I know there are ways around all of it, but at least they could try!

Yes, I agree-the folks at AKC only think of UKC as existing for the hunting breeds! The show people need to have more structure to draw more competition for better bred dogs.



How on earth could you think a judge should have a sign off in a breed that he has bred for so many years? That's crazy! Some judges may have bred a certain breed, or perhaps a couple of different breeds that he has bred over several years, but he'd have to live a very long time to breed all different breeds for many years in order to qualify as a judge in those breeds. And what about all of the other breeds that he hasn't spent years breeding? There aren't enough judges for the number of breeds out there for this to even make sense.
As for the show people needing to have more structure to draw more competition for better bred dogs......that doesn't make sense either. We have great structure in our dogs; they are UKC and AKC Champions both......we don't have competition in our BREED, period. Our breed isn't being shown because of a lack of structure! It's not being shown because of the lack of numbers in our breed being shown in UKC! I have seen some breeds being shown in UKC that have lousy structure, maybe that's a breed you own? I don't know. Overall, we DO have good structure in our breed!

__________________
GrendsLori


Posted by figtree on 08-09-2007 04:22 PM:

Well said GrendsLori in response to BLackStar's requirement to become a judge in both AKC and UKC.

Perhaps she/he should check out the new AKC judges in the past 15 years and she/he will find that the majority of them "were big time handlers" and actually asked by AKC to become a judge. Most of them have bred only one breed or none at all, but worked for AKC judges and were so highly recommended by those judges that they were given groups at a time to become a judge, so I ask which mother club "signed off" for them.

So where do we get the idea that judges should breed all the breeds to become a judge or have a "sign off" by a mother club representative. Most breeds don't have a mother club and when they do, most of those members can't agree on what the actual breed should be, so what happens then, some breeder of the breed signs off, which only if the proposed judge agrees with that person's breeding program. If this were true with the 250+++ breeds recognized by the world registries, you would have to live a 100++++ years and do nothing but breed dogs.

It took me almost 10 years to "earn" my licenses basically one by one in UKC and am proud of it. This took lots of work and many recommendations by breed owners who needed judges for their breeds, and lots of thanks to those people.

Another note is that UKC judges take their responsibilities seriously and don't play the handler game with placements and really don't care who is on the other end of the lead.

fran

__________________
figtree UKC judge


Posted by Tina Camp on 08-09-2007 05:30 PM:

IF judges had to earn single breeds again, how many judges do you think it would take to hold an all-breed show? With everything going up in price (including judge's fees), I doubt that too many people would be able to support the show. Even if it were a multi-breed show the number of judges needed would still be a bit much. I'm sure you would want your breed to be included.

If everyone wants UKC to be like the "other" registry, what do we change next? Perhaps pre-entry only. That way everyone can plan their day accordingly. After that pro handlers and chalking.

It amazes me that this is a UKC message board and other registries are always popping up in the subjects here. I don't see any public forum boards on the "other" registy. If the "other" registry is so superior, why don't they offer a public forum board?

The United Kennel Club is what it is. Please don't confuse us with other registries.

__________________
Tina L. Camp

Please visit:
Great Lakes Boxer Club


Posted by Cedarroseahts on 08-09-2007 07:07 PM:

BREEDS & STANDARDS

WELL SAID,TINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
Jackie Craver
Cedar Rose AHT's,Rats & Teddies
Home of 2006 TRT Top 10 Award of Excellence Winner
GRCH CDROSE PARTY TIME MAN
Home of 2005 AHT Top 10
Award of Excellence Winner
GRCH Flinthill's Pandemonium @Cedarose


Posted by grendslori on 08-10-2007 04:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tina Camp
IF judges had to earn single breeds again, how many judges do you think it would take to hold an all-breed show? With everything going up in price (including judge's fees), I doubt that too many people would be able to support the show. Even if it were a multi-breed show the number of judges needed would still be a bit much. I'm sure you would want your breed to be included.

If everyone wants UKC to be like the "other" registry, what do we change next? Perhaps pre-entry only. That way everyone can plan their day accordingly. After that pro handlers and chalking.

It amazes me that this is a UKC message board and other registries are always popping up in the subjects here. I don't see any public forum boards on the "other" registy. If the "other" registry is so superior, why don't they offer a public forum board?

The United Kennel Club is what it is. Please don't confuse us with other registries.



Hello Tina! (you know us....we're the Pyr people LOLs!)

While I do agree with you on what you have written here I think you have to take into account that many people on here also show in AKC and many of those same people are just starting off in UKC; they are bound to make comparisons between the two clubs. AKC is just SO POPULAR that it's a hard club to ignore! As for us; we LOVE UKC even though we never have the competition that so many others have....it's just fun going after the Group Is and the Best In Shows. And it's a real riot to not HAVE TO CHALK!!!

__________________
GrendsLori


Posted by Tina Camp on 08-10-2007 05:28 PM:

I, along with many other UKC supporters, handle in other registries. I personally feel that the UKC Message Board is not the place to educate or discuss the happenings of other registries. In my opinion, the UKC Message Boards should not have to "bear witness" to comparisons of other registries. It's like someone running for President of the United States and everytime they spoke, the sang the accolades of another country.

__________________
Tina L. Camp

Please visit:
Great Lakes Boxer Club


Posted by toyfoxhome on 08-13-2007 04:06 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by figtree

Another note is that UKC judges take their responsibilities seriously and don't play the handler game with placements and really don't care who is on the other end of the lead.





Some do, some don't.


Posted by AnkhuIGs on 08-13-2007 02:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tina Camp
I, along with many other UKC supporters, handle in other registries. I personally feel that the UKC Message Board is not the place to educate or discuss the happenings of other registries. In my opinion, the UKC Message Boards should not have to "bear witness" to comparisons of other registries. It's like someone running for President of the United States and everytime they spoke, the sang the accolades of another country.


I disagree. I think its perfectly acceptable. especially when many exhibit in BOTH venues, and AKC registrations are accepted in the UKC. They are in bed together whether they like it or not, and whether we like it or not, therefor it is quite valid to compare the apple and the orange.

__________________
Serena Galloway
www.ankhu.com

Home of Multi-BIS U-GrCh, Multi Group Winning/Placing AKC Bronze GCh, MBIS/MRBIS Int'l Ch, CKC Ch. Pineridge-Anji's St. Cecilia

Home of BIS/MRBIS U-GrCh., MBPIG CKC Ch., Int'l Ch, AKC GCh. Ankhu's Steamy Windows

No part of this message may be forwarded without permission


Posted by aprilfawn on 02-11-2008 11:56 PM:

a reminder

G. Judges’ Code of Ethics. UKC Judges are approved on the basis of their knowledge of dogs, their understanding of the UKC rules, their dedication to the sport of purebred and performance dogs, and their integrity. Judges are the role models for our sport and, as such, are expected to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. Judges should adhere to the following guidelines when judging:

1. Remember that Judges’ decisions play a key role in determining future breeding stock. Conformation decisions must be based strictly on the UKC standard and performance placements on the UKC rules.

2. Remember that performance Judges must be sure they make every effort to be consistent when scoring/timing each dog.

3. Weigh Pull Judges who compete at an event where they are officiating must be aware that their decisions are subject to scrutiny and must make every effort to ensure that their decisions are above reproach.

4. Judges should dress appropriately for the event and the weather. A Judge’s appearance should always be neat and professional.

5. Judges must not only avoid impropriety but also the appearance of impropriety. In a sport where Judges are bound to have numerous friends among the exhibitors, it is important when judging to keep socializing at events to a minimum, both in and out of the ring. Judges should be cordial to all exhibitors while maintaining a professional distance.

6. When not judging, Judges are encouraged to participate in UKC events as spectators, exhibitors, workers, and club members. In such situations, however, Judges must be mindful that people give extra attention to their words. Judges should refrain from gossip and be cautious about discussing dogs they have judged.

__________________
Klee Kai of Del Mar


Posted by Lilac Hill APBT on 02-12-2008 02:41 PM:

Re: a reminder

quote:
Originally posted by aprilfawn
G. Judges’ Code of Ethics. UKC Judges are approved on the basis of their knowledge of dogs, their understanding of the UKC rules, their dedication to the sport of purebred and performance dogs, and their integrity. Judges are the role models for our sport and, as such, are expected to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. Judges should adhere to the following guidelines when judging:

1. Remember that Judges’ decisions play a key role in determining future breeding stock. Conformation decisions must be based strictly on the UKC standard and performance placements on the UKC rules.

2. Remember that performance Judges must be sure they make every effort to be consistent when scoring/timing each dog.

3. Weigh Pull Judges who compete at an event where they are officiating must be aware that their decisions are subject to scrutiny and must make every effort to ensure that their decisions are above reproach.

4. Judges should dress appropriately for the event and the weather. A Judge’s appearance should always be neat and professional.

5. Judges must not only avoid impropriety but also the appearance of impropriety. In a sport where Judges are bound to have numerous friends among the exhibitors, it is important when judging to keep socializing at events to a minimum, both in and out of the ring. Judges should be cordial to all exhibitors while maintaining a professional distance.

6. When not judging, Judges are encouraged to participate in UKC events as spectators, exhibitors, workers, and club members. In such situations, however, Judges must be mindful that people give extra attention to their words. Judges should refrain from gossip and be cautious about discussing dogs they have judged.



April this is the second topic I've seen you post this on AND on a yahoo group list. Why not just start 1 topic and air your gripe? Why beat around the bush?

I'm with Valerie in saying that my dogs have stellar pedigrees and have working dogs behind them so are not just another pretty face.

As to the comment most show AKC, well not all breeds are AKC breeds. Mine isn't. The Ibizan doesn't show AKC either so that shoots down that theory.

Was this thread about the standard? I'm actually really happy with the job Kathy did with the Ibizan standard and have NO complaints. I Do have complaints about the APBT standard but she didn't write it so......

__________________
Karen Frenette & Lilac Hill American Pit Bull Terriers
CH UWPCH PR Arkay's Pink Cadillac
CH UWP PR Arkay's Rawhide Rowdy Yates
PR Lilac Hill's Hello Darlin
PR Lilac Hill's Big Iron
PR Lilac Hill's A White Sport Coat
PR Lilac Hills walk The Line
Still with one nutty Ibizan
UWP CH Special Acres Just a Figment
Now a Rattie
PR Arkay's Double Deck Pinochle


Posted by Sue Hamilton on 02-12-2008 09:50 PM:

Ibizan doesn't show where????

quote:
Originally posted by Lilac Hill APBT
[As to the comment most show AKC, well not all breeds are AKC breeds. Mine isn't. The Ibizan doesn't show AKC either so that shoots down that theory.

Was this thread about the standard? I'm actually really happy with the job Kathy did with the Ibizan standard and have NO complaints. I Do have complaints about the APBT standard but she didn't write it so...... [/B]


Am I miss-understanding the paragraph above? The Ibizan doesn't show AKC? It has since it was recognized by the AKC in 1979....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibizan_Hound

....and there was a quite nice Ibizan shown in the Westminster yesterday. I'm personally acquainted with one of the foremost AKC breeders of Ibizans, and have known her since shortly after the breed was recognized, so perhaps the poster meant something else??

Sue Hamilton

__________________
Susan and Richard Hamilton
Alpha Norwegian Elkhounds


Posted by Lilac Hill APBT on 02-13-2008 09:22 PM:

Re: Ibizan doesn't show where????

quote:
Originally posted by Sue Hamilton
Am I miss-understanding the paragraph above? The Ibizan doesn't show AKC? It has since it was recognized by the AKC in 1979....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibizan_Hound

....and there was a quite nice Ibizan shown in the Westminster yesterday. I'm personally acquainted with one of the foremost AKC breeders of Ibizans, and have known her since shortly after the breed was recognized, so perhaps the poster meant something else??

Sue Hamilton



MY Ibizan doesn't show AKC. In fact his uncle WAS in Westminster on Monday. We don't do the politics of IHCUS and Phantom's breeder is fine with it. As to your pointing out who you know, your point would be what exactly?

__________________
Karen Frenette & Lilac Hill American Pit Bull Terriers
CH UWPCH PR Arkay's Pink Cadillac
CH UWP PR Arkay's Rawhide Rowdy Yates
PR Lilac Hill's Hello Darlin
PR Lilac Hill's Big Iron
PR Lilac Hill's A White Sport Coat
PR Lilac Hills walk The Line
Still with one nutty Ibizan
UWP CH Special Acres Just a Figment
Now a Rattie
PR Arkay's Double Deck Pinochle


Posted by Sue Hamilton on 02-14-2008 01:24 PM:

Re: Re: Ibizan doesn't show where????

quote:
Originally posted by Lilac Hill APBT
MY Ibizan doesn't show AKC. In fact his uncle WAS in Westminster on Monday. We don't do the politics of IHCUS and Phantom's breeder is fine with it. As to your pointing out who you know, your point would be what exactly?


Please return to your original post and read it as if someone else wrote it. It appears to state that the Ibizan is not an AKC breed...NOT that YOURS isn't being shown AKC. Clearly I misunderstood your meaning, but it wasn't hard to do. Thank you for explaining your statement.

Sue

__________________
Susan and Richard Hamilton
Alpha Norwegian Elkhounds


Posted by padfoot on 02-16-2008 03:34 AM:

Judges are suppose to attend seminars, is there a way that UKC could track which judges have and have not attended a seminar? Another idea is if a judge gets more than a couple of complaints that UKC can review their license? Just curious.


Posted by figtree on 02-18-2008 03:36 PM:

Dear Padfoot

If you go to the judges list, you will find that there is a note after each judge's name when he/she is due for another seminar. We must attend one every three years to keep our judging privileges.

When we send in show applications with prospective judges for an event, they are approved by UKC. If the judge has not attended a seminar at least every three years, they are not approved by UKC to judge until the seminar is attended. So, UKC does track the judges.

And once again the person who spoke of the Ibizan not being an accepted breed by AKC, is just another example that a lot of the posts and replies on this message board are unfounded because people do not have all the facts regarding a situation, full knowledge of what they are speaking. This is message board is used a lot to just vent complaints about one thing or another or just about anything which spreads gossip and unfounded inuendos.

Fran

__________________
figtree UKC judge


Posted by Lilac Hill APBT on 02-18-2008 10:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by figtree

And once again the person who spoke of the Ibizan not being an accepted breed by AKC, is just another example that a lot of the posts and replies on this message board are unfounded because people do not have all the facts regarding a situation, full knowledge of what they are speaking. This is message board is used a lot to just vent complaints about one thing or another or just about anything which spreads gossip and unfounded inuendos.

Fran



And Fran I think you need to go back and READ posts you have obviously skipped. OUR Ibizan UWP CH Special Acres Just a Figment does not show AKC. I have full knowledge of the breed and where it can and can't show. In fact it can show a heck of a lot more places than my UKC only APBTs.

When I posted "the Ibizan" I mistakenly thought that people would see that we have one and I was referring to him. Apparently that went over people's heads in a huge way.

If you aren't making mistakes such as the post above, then what are you doing?

__________________
Karen Frenette & Lilac Hill American Pit Bull Terriers
CH UWPCH PR Arkay's Pink Cadillac
CH UWP PR Arkay's Rawhide Rowdy Yates
PR Lilac Hill's Hello Darlin
PR Lilac Hill's Big Iron
PR Lilac Hill's A White Sport Coat
PR Lilac Hills walk The Line
Still with one nutty Ibizan
UWP CH Special Acres Just a Figment
Now a Rattie
PR Arkay's Double Deck Pinochle


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:44 AM. Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 73 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club