UKC Forums Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 92 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- Ted Cruz (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928447216)


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 03:44 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by berger
First it is true that in early 2013 lobbyist's decided Cruz was there man and they guaranteed$40 million dollars to form a Cruz pac and they got Ted on board.

Secondly straight from Cruz's mouth he said he filibustered and shut down the government because he was wanting to defund Obamacare. Now your saying he didn't shut down the government. So are you saying Cruz lied, hmmmm sounds familiar!!

Third Cruz after the 2014 elections was talking about how the republicans were so worried they would loose seats in both house's because he shut down the government. Oops there again he was talking about how he shut down the government. Now Cruz was one of my top 2 picks when people were announcing they were running for President. Trump was at the bottom of the list down there with Jeb, Lindsay and Kasich. If you want to know the truth Rubio has done a lot more to cripple Obamacare then Cruz ever has.




Democrat talking points. Cruz set the course, and held firm.......alone I might add. All the other yellow bellies that ran on the same thing to get elected, turned and ran when the heat got turned up. He stuck to what he said he would do when elected, and has never apologized for it since, as he shouldn't. But the facts are that funds come from the house, and the democrats controlled the senate. They could've passed the bill to fund the government but refused to do so because Cruz was instrumental in attaching the defunding obamcare to the budget. The final decision was the democrats call and in their control.


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 04:06 AM:

Taken directly from the wikipedia account of the event.


On September 30, the Republican-led House sent many proposals to continue funding the government through December while delaying or blocking the Affordable Care Act, each of which were blocked by the Democratic-led Senate.[67] Even if the Senate had agreed to House demands, President Obama threatened to veto any bill that would delay the Affordable Care Act.[68]

With only an hour before the start of the shutdown, Republicans in the House attempted to start budget conference-committee negotiations. Senate Democrats, who had attempted to start such negotiations 18 times since January and been denied by GOP members each time, balked: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stated, "We will not go to conference with a gun to our head,"

Cruz was the leader, architect, and in the end the lone soul still standing on defunding obamacare, so therefore he gets both the credit and the blame, but he himself did not, nor could not shut down the government. He may be the reason, but he didn't pull the lever, that was the democrats.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-24-2016 05:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
You are so full of it I don't even know where to start. Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth. All the long time established lobbyist loving politicians hate Cruz because he's actually a lobbyist loving politician? Explain that one to me??

Secondly Ted Cruz did NOT shut down the government. First of all he's a Senator. Funding comes from the House! Secondly at that time the Senate was controlled by the democrats. Obama and his administration was who decided to close Federal parks, furlough employees, and erect barricades at national memorials. Perhaps you should think and inform yourself!!?

Thirdly Cruz was fighting for a defund Obamacare ammendment to the budget, EXACTLY what he and many others had promised to do, except he's the only one to carry the torch with it when it mattered. The democrat led senate wouldn't go along with it, which created an impasse, but that was their call.

While all the republican yellow bellies were whining about all the positions they were going to lose because they were getting blamed for the shutdown, a yr later the republicans won in a landslide on the house side, and took over the senate. Again, maybe you should inform yourself???

It sounds like it would be a terrible loss if he wasn't a Senator after doing all those things. Maybe he should stay there? Seems like that's where he could do the most good. Not to mention it's evident that he can win that elected office, the White House not so much.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 02:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
It sounds like it would be a terrible loss if he wasn't a Senator after doing all those things. Maybe he should stay there? Seems like that's where he could do the most good. Not to mention it's evident that he can win that elected office, the White House not so much.


Says a bunch of guys on a coon dog message board. I'm in the same boat but I get my information from actual numbers, not a feeling based on emotion.

Cruz routinely beats Clinton in head to head General Election polls. Trump routinely loses to her, and not just a little bit.

Yesterday's Fox News General Election poll like just about every other poll you can find shows Cruz beating Clinton, Trump losing to Clinton.

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Clinton 49, Trump 38.

General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Clinton 44, Cruz 47.


Posted by 4play on 03-24-2016 02:06 PM:

The Establishment...........

Has suddenly decided to start backing Cruz?
Sounds like they realized America wasn't gonna except any
"Appointed" nominee!!

JMO;
Too little too late.The Trump train is loading up w/delegates.


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 02:27 PM:

Trump also wins some things substantially in that new Fox News General Election poll........problem is it's the wrong things.

"Scared" if elected President.

Trump 49% Clinton 33% Cruz 21%


Viewed Unfavorably

Trump 65% Clinton 58% Cruz 53%


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-24-2016 03:35 PM:

And the Trump Train rolls on and on and on. I just don't understand it. I mean, the majority of people are against him according to the polls. The majority of people don't like him according to the polls. He can't win according to the polls. The majority of people are afraid if he does get elected according to the polls. And yet the Trump Train rolls on and on. Just who are these poll people asking?


Posted by dsmay on 03-24-2016 03:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
And the Trump Train rolls on and on and on. I just don't understand it. I mean, the majority of people are against him according to the polls. The majority of people don't like him according to the polls. He can't win according to the polls. The majority of people are afraid if he does get elected according to the polls. And yet the Trump Train rolls on and on. Just who are these poll people asking?




Members of ISIS !!!!!!


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-24-2016 03:58 PM:

Oh my goodness, that must have been a pollster that I saw standing in front of a mosque asking people questions as they came out.


Posted by 4play on 03-24-2016 04:10 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
And the Trump Train rolls on and on and on. I just don't understand it. I mean, the majority of people are against him according to the polls. The majority of people don't like him according to the polls. He can't win according to the polls. The majority of people are afraid if he does get elected according to the polls. And yet the Trump Train rolls on and on. Just who are these poll people asking?



Reagan wasn't supposed to win either.
30+ yrs later still the measuring stick for the rest.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-24-2016 04:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
Says a bunch of guys on a coon dog message board. I'm in the same boat but I get my information from actual numbers, not a feeling based on emotion.

Cruz routinely beats Clinton in head to head General Election polls. Trump routinely loses to her, and not just a little bit.

Yesterday's Fox News General Election poll like just about every other poll you can find shows Cruz beating Clinton, Trump losing to Clinton.

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Clinton 49, Trump 38.

General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Clinton 44, Cruz 47.



Really the "actual numbers" that count right now are the nearly 300 delegates Trump is leading Cruz by. And the only "poll" the really counts is the one that closes on Nov. 8, 2016.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Matt Marshall on 03-24-2016 06:10 PM:

Guys all you have to do is type in United States federal government shutdown 2013. You are all intelligent people and can read for yourselves. Look under the Wikipedia. The shutdown was being set in motion as early as 2010 by the republicans. I'm not taking one side over another as far as party affiliation . Both have hit an all time low in my book.
Kind of hard to argue against voting for a non-politician after reading that. But as someone said earlier..... Just go and vote.


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 07:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
Really the "actual numbers" that count right now are the nearly 300 delegates Trump is leading Cruz by. And the only "poll" the really counts is the one that closes on Nov. 8, 2016.


Yep, keep telling yourself that. Ignore the consistent numbers all you want, it wont change it. It's why Trump continually loses to Clinton when you wouldn't think he would as fired up as people are about him. And barring something unforeseen, he will continue to do so.

His national numbers among women, hispanics, young people, and blacks, are horrific. There's not enough white Republicans, and the few democrats crossing over, to come close to making up that difference.


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 07:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by 4play
Reagan wasn't supposed to win either.
30+ yrs later still the measuring stick for the rest.



Tell the whole story. From the nomination on, Reagan led in the polls up to election day. Prior to that he was losing to Carter.

Reagan was the "Great Communicator." He won people over. If you think ads repeating things Trump has said about women for example, will sway women voters to his side, and put him in the same category as the great communicator, then I don't live in the same world as you do. Haha.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-24-2016 08:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
From the nomination on, Reagan led in the polls up to election day. Prior to that he was losing to Carter.

And you think this couldn't be happening today with Trump vs Clinton?
These Clinton/Trump polls are useless. They are only wishful thinking, B.S., and black magic.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-24-2016 08:35 PM:

double post.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by GA DAWG on 03-24-2016 08:43 PM:

Let me ask yall this? Have any of yall been polled for these make believe polls? I havent. I see a man walking away with this election and aint nothing besides offing him will stop it and I wouldnt put that past em.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 08:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
And you think this couldn't be happening today with Trump vs Clinton?
These Clinton/Trump polls are useless. They are only wishful thinking, B.S., and black magic.



Well unless you have your own black magic to make a whole population of women, hispanics, young voters, and blacks, disappear come November, then those polls will stay at numbers you don't like.

Trump is an extremely polarizing figure. Everybody knows him and generally has a strong opinion about him one way or the other. The likely hood of him swaying those voters over to his side is slim to none.

Anythings possible. But barring a catastrophe happening in the U.S. that would put him in a favorable light, he has the biggest mountain to climb out of all the candidates to beat Hillary. It's why he's consistently on the wrong side of the numbers.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-24-2016 09:07 PM:

Dawg, I've heard several people say they think that will happen or an attempt anyway if Trump is elected. As far as being polled, nope.

Well Started, I didn't say they were numbers I didn't like. They are numbers I simply just don't believe. They are like liberal math. No substance to them. But I don't want to ruin it for you so you go ahead and keep putting your faith in a pig in a poke.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 09:12 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by GA DAWG
Let me ask yall this? Have any of yall been polled for these make believe polls? I havent. I see a man walking away with this election and aint nothing besides offing him will stop it and I wouldnt put that past em.


Weren't you the guy that told a man on here there wasn't enough Christians if they all voted to win an election? But the same reasoning doesn't apply to white Republicans?

Do the numbers, they don't add up. The % of white vote keeps falling. Trump needs to do as good as Romney in the other demographics to have a fighting chance. In most cases he's doing far worse.

When Reagan won in 1980, whites made up 88% of the electorate. This yr it will be down to 70%. Meanwhile the % of demographics like hispanics have quadrupled.


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 09:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
Dawg, I've heard several people say they think that will happen or an attempt anyway if Trump is elected. As far as being polled, nope.

Well Started, I didn't say they were numbers I didn't like. They are numbers I simply just don't believe. They are like liberal math. No substance to them. But I don't want to ruin it for you so you go ahead and keep putting your faith in a pig in a poke.



Aint putting my faith in nothing when it comes to politics. Just warning of what a lot of signs and hard numbers within the population are pointing too. Even polls can't change that.

I can figure out for myself that if the other demographics are increasing, you can't perform way worse with them than you did the last time you lost if you expect to win. Can Trump somehow change those numbers? Maybe

Excitement only gets you so far, the rest is actual voters.


Posted by GA DAWG on 03-24-2016 10:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
Weren't you the guy that told a man on here there wasn't enough Christians if they all voted to win an election? But the same reasoning doesn't apply to white Republicans?

Do the numbers, they don't add up. The % of white vote keeps falling. Trump needs to do as good as Romney in the other demographics to have a fighting chance. In most cases he's doing far worse.

When Reagan won in 1980, whites made up 88% of the electorate. This yr it will be down to 70%. Meanwhile the % of demographics like hispanics have quadrupled.

UH No I was not. Open your eyes friend. Romney was a dumb butt. Just a little less than big O. Thats why we voted for him. Had to instead of voting for Islamic regime. I see all kinds of woman for trump.I see a good many LEGAL Latino for him to. You've been brainwashed may as well bat for the other team.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by berger on 03-24-2016 10:21 PM:

I hear Obama is putting the blame on Trump for the Brussels attack!!

__________________
Tree Jar'n Black and Tans
Home of Tree Jar'n Coonhound Kennels


319-201-8445


Posted by 4play on 03-24-2016 10:31 PM:

JMO

Trump vs Hillary;
I'm betting alot of Democrat Sander's{Hunters,Gun Owners,Military,and Vets} voters will swing to Trump instead of voting for Hillary and losing their guns.Not incl. Bengazi and email lies reasons not to like her.

I'm betting Carson will swing more Black/African American votes.
Cruz voters will for Trump.

Trumps numbers will get better when Sanders and Cruz are out of the way.

The Trump Train can get bigger and beat Hillary!


Posted by Well Started on 03-24-2016 10:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by GA DAWG
UH No I was not. Open your eyes friend. Romney was a dumb butt. Just a little less than big O. Thats why we voted for him. Had to instead of voting for Islamic regime. I see all kinds of woman for trump.I see a good many LEGAL Latino for him to. You've been brainwashed may as well bat for the other team.


Lol. Of course there's going to be women voting for Trump, and Latino's, and probably a small amount of blacks for that matter. There's never been a republican candidate in history that didn't get some of those demographics voting for him.

The issue is the % of those other demographics have increased and Trumps favorable/unfavorable numbers are worse with them than previous candidates. In some cases bad worse.

He may somehow change that, but he's going to HAVE to. You can't perform as badly as he is with that large of a voting block, and expect to do better than we've done before. Not enough voting white Republicans unless you've been hiding an additional 30 million of them in your back pocket.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02 PM. Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 92 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club