UKC Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 54 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- The Republican Party (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928445805)


Posted by rrs on 03-07-2016 10:26 PM:

Voted for Gov. Johnson is 2012, he is a Libertarian that does not believe gov't. should be involved in personal behavior such as drugs, sex behavior, abortion, etc. Choice should be personal and not the gov't. He was a fiscal conservative. Many so called conservatives would not support some of his positions....


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-07-2016 11:09 PM:

IMHO, both parties have changed a lot. Todays so called Democrats would call JFK a Republican. LBJ, well he'd still be called a lying crook by everybody. Also remember George H. W. Bush went after guns as did Reagan before him. Slick Willy Clinton was the one that signed it into law. NONE will keep their promises though they make many, regardless of party. People don't vote for who's the best person for the job anymore, they vote for the lesser of the two evils.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 03:11 PM:

Oh my goodness, JFK was a Republican? Reagan was for gun control? I really need to brush up on my history.
As some of you have suggested, anyone that is a true hard core conservative should have a candidate to vote for. Anyone that is a hard core liberal/socialist should have a candidate to vote for. Everyone else that is in the middle should have a candidate to vote for. It sounds to me like everyone agrees that we need three distinct parties with their own candidate. The Federalist Party sounds better to me that The Liberalist Party. Actually, The Moderate Party sounds the best.


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 03:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Oh my goodness, JFK was a Republican? Reagan was for gun control? I really need to brush up on my history.



You really need to quit throwing softballs over the plate so I can quit agreeing with you that you don't know history.

Can you name anything of significance regarding gun control during Reagan's presidency?

Can you name a significant gun rights legislation that was signed by Reagan during his presidency? I can. It was lobbied for by the NRA and considered favorable to most gun owners although some criticized a late amendment on fully automatic weapons slipped in by a Democrat.


Reagan did support both the Brady Bill, and an assault weapons ban after he was president.

He was a great man, and a terrific President, but was wrong on this. I guess getting shot and suffering from the onset of Alzheimer's can cause a few misgivings that a man can be given a pass on.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 04:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
You really need to quit throwing softballs over the plate so I can quit agreeing with you that you don't know history.

Can you name anything of significance regarding gun control during Reagan's presidency?

Can you name a significant gun rights legislation that was signed by Reagan during his presidency? I can. ....some criticized a late amendment on fully automatic weapons slipped in by a Democrat.


Reagan did support both the Brady Bill, and an assault weapons ban after he was president.




Oh my goodness, you asked and answered your own question.


And I was just trying to learn from that guy from WV. I guess that I had better check my sources better. But from what you say, Reagan is starting to sound a little more Moderate. He also sounds like a guy that changed his mind quite a few times in his life. That doesn't sound very unyielding to me.


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 04:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Oh my goodness, you asked and answered your own question.


And I was just trying to learn from that guy from WV. I guess that I had better check my sources better.



Supporting a gun bill later in life is not the same as pointing to the mans presidency. When you make the statement Reagan was for gun control, most people would assume it was when he was shaping policy and signing such things into law.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 04:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
.... I guess getting shot and suffering from the onset of Alzheimer's can cause a few misgivings that a man can be given a pass on......

I am certainly no Reagan but I have been stabbed before and my wife says that I have early onset Alzheimer's. I know that my memory is gone on some things and my reasoning is a little fuzzy sometimes. Maybe you should give me a pass on a few things.


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 04:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
I am certainly no Reagan but I have been stabbed before and my wife says that I have early onset Alzheimer's. I know that my memory is gone on some things and my reasoning is a little fuzzy sometimes. Maybe you should give me a pass on a few things.


Lol. If that's the case I will. That certainly explains a lot. Thank you for pointing that out, I will try to go easier on you from now on.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 04:25 PM:

I am just a poor Ol' long haired country boy trying to survive in this cold, cruel world. We didn't get out into the "outside world" much. What I learned was from my Dad and Grandpaw. We also didn't have a TV until I was grown and for shore didn't know what an interweb was. And they didn't even deliver a newspaper where I was raised. You had to go to town to the barbershop to hear the "news". So my knowledge of "history" is pretty limited.


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 05:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
I am just a poor Ol' long haired country boy trying to survive in this cold, cruel world. We didn't get out into the "outside world" much. What I learned was from my Dad and Grandpaw. We also didn't have a TV until I was grown and for shore didn't know what an interweb was. And they didn't even deliver a newspaper where I was raised. You had to go to town to the barbershop to hear the "news". So my knowledge of "history" is pretty limited.


I'm pretty much in the same boat, minus the long hair. Lol. We didn't have TV growing up, I read a lot. What I remember though about Reagan was that I thought he was a great man, great leader, and he inspired me, in the midst of his presidency. He wasn't somebody that I looked back on later and realized what we had and didn't know it. He did that for most of the country during his presidency.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 05:16 PM:

I heard them talking about him on TV a couple of days ago. I have a big one now but I have to rely on "the liberal media" for my news. Thay said that he was "Presidential" and that Nancy was a true "First Lady".
But the times have changed. I think that we might need a loud mouthed rednecked President now who is not afraid to raise his voice or speak his mind. Do we want an Armani wearing, soft spoken pushover that "just wants to get along"? Or do we want a J.C Penney wearing, loud mouthed redneck that is not afraid to fight for what he believes in. Maybe we need another Teddy Roosevelt. (One of you history buffs might get me on that one, but that is what I remember.) Maybe we need our own Kruschev to take his shoe off and bang on a few tables. Do we want a Dwight Eisenhour or a George Patton? (Again I might get a little history lesson here.)


Posted by GA DAWG on 03-08-2016 05:31 PM:

Thats exactly what we need. If we had a confederate states of america again lol. I think the northern folk and city folk dont think or act like we do. I can see it moving in all around me. Ive had to cuss a few of em and would have whooped 2 or 3 if theyd have kept running that mouth BUT I can get along with most folks to. Its just some of em get in my last nerve. Im gonna have to move off from here where I am and have lived my whole life. May as well move into the whitehouse

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 05:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by GA DAWG
Thats exactly what we need. If we had a confederate states of america again lol. I think the northern folk and city folk dont think or act like we do. I can see it moving in all around me. Ive had to cuss a few of em and would have whooped 2 or 3 if theyd have kept running that mouth BUT I can get along with most folks to. Its just some of em get in my last nerve. Im gonna have to move off from here where I am and have lived my whole life. May as well move into the whitehouse


No the liberals don't think or act like you do. Like roaches they can pop up anywhere. Lol. Can't speak for the city folk, but there's plenty of notherner's that are rowing from the same boat as any place in the country.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-08-2016 06:04 PM:

Are you trying to say that there are plenty of Northerners who are going to vote for Trump? Didn't he get the nomination in the Southern States? The midwestern and Texas cowboys and a couple of Yankees are the ones that voted for Cruz. Now that is according to my liberal media TV. It also said that the states with a caucus are the ones that pledged their delegates to Cruz. The liberal media said that it was something about the caucuses requiring a lot of "organization" unlike the Southern states where you have a secret ballot. But I have since learned from this message board that Trump won in the Southern voting states because a lot of so called Democrats voted for him. It sometimes gets confusing. I don't know whether to believe the "liberal" media or the "experts" on this message board.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-08-2016 06:58 PM:

There's lot of history to learn and you have the web at your finger tips. For instance, did you know that JFK and Nixon were actually really good friends? JFK made the statement that if the DNC put Johnson as the 1960 nominee for President, he would put all his support behind Nixon in the general election. Read a little and learn Richard. Don't be led by the nose by a political party.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 10:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Are you trying to say that there are plenty of Northerners who are going to vote for Trump? Didn't he get the nomination in the Southern States? The midwestern and Texas cowboys and a couple of Yankees are the ones that voted for Cruz. Now that is according to my liberal media TV. It also said that the states with a caucus are the ones that pledged their delegates to Cruz. The liberal media said that it was something about the caucuses requiring a lot of "organization" unlike the Southern states where you have a secret ballot. But I have since learned from this message board that Trump won in the Southern voting states because a lot of so called Democrats voted for him. It sometimes gets confusing. I don't know whether to believe the "liberal" media or the "experts" on this message board.



Richard, Richard, Richard. Just when I think you're starting to make some sense, you go and ruin it. Lol.

This reply was so far off context and down so many side roads it took me a while to unravel it.

Trump has and will get votes North, South, East, West from plenty of people that consider themselves conservative, same as Cruz.

You've made the self proclamation that you're not a historian, but I've never heard you state you can't do math, and don't believe it to be true.

In the open primary states, many of which have been in the South, Trump along with his normal votes has benefited from an overage of democrat votes. It's easy to figure out with simple math.

In the closed primary states where democrats can't vote in a Republican primary, Cruz has won 85% of them so far.


Posted by Well Started on 03-08-2016 10:10 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
There's lot of history to learn and you have the web at your finger tips. For instance, did you know that JFK and Nixon were actually really good friends? JFK made the statement that if the DNC put Johnson as the 1960 nominee for President, he would put all his support behind Nixon in the general election. Read a little and learn Richard. Don't be led by the nose by a political party.


I'm a Republican and that's actually a stain on JFK. Nixon was a fairly smart President at foreign affairs, but he was not a good person, or good President for that matter.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-09-2016 04:35 PM:

Nixon.....foreign affairs???? Isn't he the one that got us into that Vietnam mess? Or am I historically illiterate again?


Posted by Well Started on 03-09-2016 04:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Nixon.....foreign affairs???? Isn't he the one that got us into that Vietnam mess? Or am I historically illiterate again?



No, I'm going to soon just stop responding. Was already in place under JFK, was escalated considerably under Johnson, then Nixon campaigned on getting it ended. Everybody failed miserably, but Nixon certainly wasn't the one that got us into that mess.

That said, he was a terrible President.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-09-2016 06:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WVBLUEBOY
There's lot of history to learn and you have the web at your finger tips. For instance, did you know that JFK and Nixon were actually really good friends? JFK made the statement that if the DNC put Johnson as the 1960 nominee for President, he would put all his support behind Nixon in the general election. Read a little and learn Richard. Don't be led by the nose by a political party.

Oh my goodness, so things haven't really changed that much, only the names. I really am learning a lot from the interweb.


Posted by WVBLUEBOY on 03-09-2016 06:15 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Well Started
No, I'm going to soon just stop responding. Was already in place under JFK, was escalated considerably under Johnson, then Nixon campaigned on getting it ended. Everybody failed miserably, but Nixon certainly wasn't the one that got us into that mess.

That said, he was a terrible President.


Vietnam was on a slow burner from back when Ike was President up through JFK's administration. Johnson started a full war there. Nixon finally got enough pressure from the people that he had to put an end to it. I agree with Well Started though, Nixon wasn't a good President. Johnson wasn't either.

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-10-2016 02:35 PM:

Was Nixon a conservative? Was Johnson a conservative? Or were they liberals? What was Teddy Roosevelt? Didn't they call him a "Rough Rider" and didn't he go around shooting/killing wild animals? Didn't he get his picture taken all of the time holding or wearing a gun of some sort? How in the world did he ever get elected?


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-10-2016 02:38 PM:

Is Michigan a Northern state or a Midwestern state? I heard one of those liberal media reporters refer to Michigan as a Midwestern state the other night.


Posted by Well Started on 03-10-2016 03:06 PM:

I have an idea. Lets all start continually posting statements as rhetorical questions, that we really neither want nor need an answer to in our own minds.


Posted by Richard Lambert on 03-10-2016 03:21 PM:

OK, I will repost it so that maybe it is not so rhetorical. (I think. I don't really know exactly what "rhetorical" means.)
Do the people in Michigan consider themselves a "Northern State" or a "Midwestern State". I have always thought of them as a "Northern State" but I can see where they might be considered a "Midwestern State". I mean they aren't in the Northeastern tip but they aren't in the central part either. I have always wondered about Wisconsin also. They are kinda like Texas. Texas isn't really a "Southern State" but it isn't really a "Midwestern State" either. I think that Texas is usually just considered "Texas", though. They are big enough to stand alone and usually do.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 54 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club