UKC Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 71 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- my take on accuracy ect.... (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928428725)


Posted by Kler Kry on 09-29-2015 03:49 PM:

mnb&k

This is about the only post that I've read lately where someone is actually trying to improve their hunting stock. You say that you are not an "official competition hunter" but I'll bet when you hunt alone with several of your dogs that you are comparing and competing them against each other. A true competition.
Sounds like you are doing what we should all be doing.
I salute your efforts.
My opinion is that most breeders that I'ved observed are not trying to improve the breed, but have found that it is far easier to produce dogs that capitalize on the weaknesses of the competition rules than it is to produce a higher level of ability.
Mental illness is a dominate trait in all mammals, thus dogs with a gimmic for winning reproduce themselves.
Thanks for your efforts!


Posted by Rowdy on 09-29-2015 03:54 PM:

^^^
Has to be at the top of the list for best posts ever.

__________________
Chris Powell
Houndsman XP Podcast


Posted by JiM on 09-29-2015 04:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by michael.magorian
I'm dead serious. I would think that a person would rather KNOW there is a coon in the tree and praise the dog for a job well done, rather than let the dog continue to tree slicks. Just my opinion anyway. Coon is in the tree praise the dog, and if there isn't a coon in the tree, don't say a word and yank it off the tree and kick out again.

I guess time is relevant only to the hunter. Would you rather have a dog tree 3 trees in 30 minutes with no idea if there were any coons, or would you rather tree one coon and know for sure?



You are assuming that by shining 30 minutes, you know for sure if a tree has a coon or not. But in, fact, you could shine all night and never know for sure. Most of the time, if you don't find it in 5 or 6 minutes, you won't find it in 30 but it might very well still be there. Yu really aren't gaining anything substantial by shining a tree 30 minutes and in fact, are probably going backwards in your training.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by michael.magorian on 09-29-2015 05:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
You are assuming that by shining 30 minutes, you know for sure if a tree has a coon or not. But in, fact, you could shine all night and never know for sure. Most of the time, if you don't find it in 5 or 6 minutes, you won't find it in 30 but it might very well still be there. Yu really aren't gaining anything substantial by shining a tree 30 minutes and in fact, are probably going backwards in your training.


We can argue circles around this and get no where. There are plenty of times when I have known that a tree was empty and there have been more times when I know there was a coon in the tree. There are guys out there that don't really care about the time spent, but rather spent wisely. Where we are, very rarely is 5 mins ever going to be enough, but to each his own.

It just goes back to differences in comp. hunters and pleasure hunters.

__________________
Walk softly and carry a big stick.


Posted by mnb&t on 09-29-2015 05:17 PM:

jim I agree with young dog not doing that. have done it before and is probably counter productive for most young dogs. the very low percent of dogs I keep long term treeing a extra 30 minutes or whatever isn't gonna make or break and Mike is talking more when hunting seasoned dogs.

__________________
i will finish the game.


Posted by RLenhart on 09-29-2015 05:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by michael.magorian

It just goes back to differences in comp. hunters and pleasure hunters.


You are right there Michael. I guess we all are entitled to our opinions of how much time to spend on a tough tree but on the difference of finding the coon when pleasure hunting as opposed to comp hunting, look back again to the thread Matt referenced. At some point in that conversation I mentioned how many times have you left the tree just to walk across a field and shine back across it to see the coon. If your pleasure hunting your going to count that coon as seen, if your comp hunting it's sorry pal the tree is already scored. it's going on the card as coon seen for the night but you can't score it. That's enough to make anybody moan but that's the breaks LOL


Posted by moonshine man on 09-29-2015 09:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by michael.magorian
I'm beginning to wonder how many hunters out there KNOW if there is a coon in the tree or not. I have hunted with Matt more than anyone, and I would bet money he hunts more than most replying. Not that I need to defend Matt against anyone, but he sure doesn't give a tree a once over and says, "Yep, we will give them that den." There has been many of times when I have more than given up on any kind of optimism and Matt has found the coon after 30 minutes of looking.

This discussion makes me think of the coon hunting show that was on a few years ago, and guys on it would always say, "Ya, we are going to have to circle this one. The leaves are just too thick." And they'd staring at a tree 16" in diameter.

If you KNOW your dog is honestly 50% accurate how can you brag that dog at all. I would be livid pissed if I walk a quarter to half a mile and 50% of the time it is for no reason.

Not trying to hurt any butts, but if I was wrong 50% of the time, I would probably be finding new employment as well.



Everyone has their own way of hunting and what they think is or will better their dogs and if they think it does the best of luck to them but for me im not going to crawl in brush piles or stick cameras in holes or dive under the water or pull out a rabbits foot to make my dogs 10% or 20% more accurate on trees ill just leave them for the next time.
We have a lot of den trees here some you would never think was until you run out of fire wood and a lot of walking coons that will make a dog look slick if you dont check good and i bet you one thing if you are like the rest of the people that hunts here after a few weeks of hunting you will be proud to have a 50% dog.

__________________
( White Light What A Night )


Posted by msinc on 09-29-2015 11:38 PM:

I read this thread and I am still wondering exactly how some of you guys come up with the percentage....
So, just to be clear, if you go hunting and lets say over the course of 4 months time of average hunting your dogs tree up 80 trees....you see 40 coons, you see 20 hollows big enough to hold a coon and 10 trees that have enough leaves on them that there could be a coon there and 10 trees that there is slim to no chance a coon is there....what percentage are you calling this dog???? Shine the tree for 2 hours if you want to, I don't care....

50%....75%.....90%.....95%....what?????

Pretty please with a cherry on top, spare us the "if my dog only treed 80 trees in 4 months I'd have shot him, and he better be deep and alone!!!" posts, I wont be impressed. Just answer honestly please..{trying to be nice here...which I only do about once a year!!!}

Edit: Not trying to argue, not trying to judge anyone or their dog, I could care less what the rest of the worlds dog is doing...I am just trying to "get it" how folks come up with percentages of dogs treeing coons.


Posted by RLenhart on 09-29-2015 11:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by msinc
I read this thread and I am still wondering exactly how some of you guys come up with the percentage....
So, just to be clear, if you go hunting and lets say over the course of 4 months time of average hunting your dogs tree up 80 trees....you see 40 coons, you see 20 hollows big enough to hold a coon and 10 trees that have enough leaves on them that there could be a coon there and 10 trees that there is slim to no chance a coon is there....what percentage are you calling this dog???? Shine the tree for 2 hours if you want to, I don't care....

50%....75%.....90%.....95%....what?????

Pretty please with a cherry on top, spare us the "if my dog only treed 80 trees in 4 months I'd have shot him, and he better be deep and alone!!!" posts, I wont be impressed. Just answer honestly please..{trying to be nice here...which I only do about once a year!!!}


Oh they're calling that 50%


Posted by msinc on 09-29-2015 11:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by RLenhart
Oh they're calling that 50%


Okay, so, coon seen equals "dog did good"...no coon seen equals dog messed up or is lacking something {nose power, training, brains, etc.} to be considered a coondog.


Posted by RLenhart on 09-29-2015 11:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by msinc
Okay, so, coon seen equals "dog did good"...no coon seen equals dog messed up or is lacking something {nose power, training, brains, etc.} to be considered a coondog.

Yes to an extent. I do have to admit there is some logic to this "you know I just like to pick LOL" basically the point is you can't get your numbers short term. You really need to run the numbers all year. then some think you need to be something above 50% but then there's those that actually think you should still see 80-90%.


Posted by msinc on 09-30-2015 12:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by RLenhart
Yes to an extent. I do have to admit there is some logic to this "you know I just like to pick LOL" basically the point is you can't get your numbers short term. You really need to run the numbers all year. then some think you need to be something above 50% but then there's those that actually think you should still see 80-90%.


Okay, so over the course of a year lets say your dog trees 200 times...you actually see 100 coons, forget everything else, dens, leaves, 150 ft. tall trees, etc. the dog is batting 50%. But they are saying that is okay or normal...I understand the logic to it now, I think.
On the one hand, I have to admit...I have known and hunted with dogs that over the long haul, we saw a high majority of coons. Much more so than with some of the other dogs I have hunted with. A good example, I know a guy right now that has a female English dog that by herself you will look at some coons. Put her with anything else, even my little Jack Daniels house dog that cant run and tree anything and this female will get real jealous, take every track backwards and tree the den.


Posted by RLenhart on 09-30-2015 12:44 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by msinc
Okay, so over the course of a year lets say your dog trees 200 times...you actually see 100 coons, forget everything else, dens, leaves, 150 ft. tall trees, etc. the dog is batting 50%. But they are saying that is okay or normal...I understand the logic to it now, I think.
On the one hand, I have to admit...I have known and hunted with dogs that over the long haul, we saw a high majority of coons. Much more so than with some of the other dogs I have hunted with. A good example, I know a guy right now that has a female English dog that by herself you will look at some coons. Put her with anything else, even my little Jack Daniels house dog that cant run and tree anything and this female will get real jealous, take every track backwards and tree the den.


I know what you mean on that female, I know one that's allot like that. Then I look at my wife and think it really doesn't matter from one species to the next they're all like that LOL.
The percent thing over the whole year I have to admit almost seems intriguing to me the more I look at it but dam that's allot of paperwork. I think I'll just stick with what works for me. Tree me lots of coons in kill season, win me some hunts during comp season and I'll keep feeding ya little buddy.


Posted by GA DAWG on 09-30-2015 12:49 AM:

Mines still not went to missing since last thread we had about it. Ive walked to one den tree since that thread however long ago thats been. Seems like I couldnt find one in a big leafy tree at end of that thread. All the others ive found since then. He is accurate. Just waiting on some different weather to see him go to missing like yall say he will.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by RLenhart on 09-30-2015 01:12 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by GA DAWG
Mines still not went to missing since last thread we had about it. Ive walked to one den tree since that thread however long ago thats been. Seems like I couldnt find one in a big leafy tree at end of that thread. All the others ive found since then. He is accurate. Just waiting on some different weather to see him go to missing like yall say he will.

Is that the same dog that was treeing bears a couple months ago? I'll bet they're pretty easy to see in the tree huh?


Posted by GA DAWG on 09-30-2015 01:18 AM:

No a different dog a bear actually got that dog a few weeks after he treed the one I posted but I still have him. He likes to gamble a good bit and is fast as lightening. Im gonna fool with him more come coon season. Ive only hunted him once since the bear got him.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by RLenhart on 09-30-2015 01:27 AM:

How many trees has this dog that never misses made since that last thread?


Posted by moonshine man on 09-30-2015 01:37 AM:

We Should Go Hunt With These 90%100% dogs %

quote:
Originally posted by RLenhart
I know what you mean on that female, I know one that's allot like that. Then I look at my wife and think it really doesn't matter from one species to the next they're all like that LOL.
The percent thing over the whole year I have to admit almost seems intriguing to me the more I look at it but dam that's allot of paperwork. I think I'll just stick with what works for me. Tree me lots of coons in kill season, win me some hunts during comp season and I'll keep feeding ya little buddy.


Its easy for people to think their dog has a coon up a tree because ole hank never misses and he would not be treeing that hard if the coon was not there but its hard to count a coon thats not there or you dont see or even a den and if you dont see the fur its not really there to me unless i see it and if i dont i want count it and thats the only way to get a true % on a dog.
Ive never seen one of the famous 90% and 100% dogs but i have hunted with some that was before the night that i went with them but they must of had a off night.

__________________
( White Light What A Night )


Posted by Rowdy on 09-30-2015 04:50 PM:

Pretty self explanatory

http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthrea...eadid=928407982

Nothing complicated about it. This is how I judge a dog's accuracy. She is 78/94 in her life.

A couple of things that I have learned along the way:
1) coons are easier to find when they are there
2) a tight mouthed dog will tree more coons that can be seen
3) hunting flat patch woods are harder to spot coons in than hill country and fence rows
4) accurate dogs exceeding the 50% range do exist
5) Smart dogs catch more game
6) a good track dog catches more game and is more accurate
7) a smart dog will track fast, tree right and be more pleasureable to hunt
8) people are too prideful to admit that they are hunting tree dogs instead of coon dogs
9) I don't care what other people hunt, they are feeding it.
10) titles don't make a coon dog

__________________
Chris Powell
Houndsman XP Podcast


Posted by Blusk25 on 09-30-2015 06:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
You are assuming that by shining 30 minutes, you know for sure if a tree has a coon or not. But in, fact, you could shine all night and never know for sure. Most of the time, if you don't find it in 5 or 6 minutes, you won't find it in 30 but it might very well still be there. Yu really aren't gaining anything substantial by shining a tree 30 minutes and in fact, are probably going backwards in your training.


This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. I've shined trees for an hour before. It's only helped my training. If I find the coon. The dog gets rewarded. If not corrected. Not verifying the coon is in the tree Your more likely to reward slick and possums. You guys must be using infrared if you can alway determine in less than six minutes.


Posted by Pigeon on 09-30-2015 06:45 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Blusk25
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. I've shined trees for an hour before.

WOW, lmao
No offense, if I'm hunting with anyone that shines trees for an hour they are driving themselves.

__________________
“If winning isn’t everything, why do they keep score?”

Do you know how much money you could win with that dog?.................Now ask if I care.


Posted by RLenhart on 09-30-2015 06:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Blusk25
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. I've shined trees for an hour before. It's only helped my training. If I find the coon. The dog gets rewarded. If not corrected. Not verifying the coon is in the tree Your more likely to reward slick and possums. You guys must be using infrared if you can alway determine in less than six minutes.

I whole hour? Really have you actually timed that and know that you spent a whole hour shining one tree? and I don't mean that as a wise crack I mean have you really done that? My god that seems like a long time to shine a tree! I will give you this even if he's in a hole he just might poke his head out in that amount of time but i'm really not waiting around to find out. 5-6 minutes probably is to quick to write it off, truth be told I've probably spent 20 minutes on more than one occasion if I was just sure there had to be a coon there but quite often I look at my watch and the comp hunter comes out and I say 10 minutes is up, call it and move on lol.


Posted by GA DAWG on 09-30-2015 06:49 PM:

You got one that has them ol coon. Bout 5 min youll find em.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by JiM on 09-30-2015 08:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Blusk25
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. I've shined trees for an hour before.


And I'm betting you know a thing or two about being ridiculous......

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by michael.magorian on 09-30-2015 09:13 PM:

Re: Pretty self explanatory

quote:
Originally posted by Rowdy
http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthrea...eadid=928407982

Nothing complicated about it. This is how I judge a dog's accuracy. She is 78/94 in her life.

A couple of things that I have learned along the way:
1) coons are easier to find when they are there
2) a tight mouthed dog will tree more coons that can be seen
3) hunting flat patch woods are harder to spot coons in than hill country and fence rows
4) accurate dogs exceeding the 50% range do exist
5) Smart dogs catch more game
6) a good track dog catches more game and is more accurate
7) a smart dog will track fast, tree right and be more pleasureable to hunt
8) people are too prideful to admit that they are hunting tree dogs instead of coon dogs
9) I don't care what other people hunt, they are feeding it.
10) titles don't make a coon dog



I think you would fit in well in this area. For those of you that act like it is magic, that hound is 83% accurate.

__________________
Walk softly and carry a big stick.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 71 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club