UKC Forums Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »
Show all 101 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=53)
-- Pope Francis (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=928349390)


Posted by TomPurdy on 12-11-2013 03:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
You are wrong in suggesting that is an example of Socialism.


Truly, Don't just say I'm wrong be specific!! Show me where I'm wrong!!


Posted by rance56 on 12-11-2013 04:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Good info there Rance. Let's put this in perspective then, Germany, which is just a little bigger than twice the size of Georgia, and about one quarter the population of the United States can produce about 70% of our entire output.


again leave the economics to the professionals. exports do not measure total production. that is GDP.

"Gross domestic product (GDP) is the market value of all officially recognized final goods and services produced within a country in a year, or other given period of time."

lets compare: usa 15.68 trillion a year. germany 3.4 trillion a year
ALMOST 5 TIMES AS MUCH PRODUCTION. wow talk about a backfire. you come on here touting they can produce 70% of what we can and its actually only about 20%!

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...any+vs.+gdp+usa

what else dont you understand on the most simplistic levels that you are trying to educate us on?

i told you on the other thread these are deep waters you are not prepared to swim in.

so now that we determine that 70% is only 20%, what are your thoughts now?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by michael.magorian on 12-11-2013 05:02 PM:

Hold on now, it has been well established that truly doesn't understand economics or the American political process. I thought this entire thread was about Pope Francis' economic ideologies as an endorsement for socialism. Beating up on truly for being misinformed is nothing new to anyone; I want to hear him argue about the Pope's stance on a world-wide redistribution of wealth.

__________________
Walk softly and carry a big stick.


Posted by Diggerman on 12-11-2013 07:17 PM:

It's not fair bringing numbers and percent signs and words like "budget" into a discussion with liberals!

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.


Posted by truly on 12-11-2013 08:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
again leave the economics to the professionals. exports do not measure total production. that is GDP.

"Gross domestic product (GDP) is the market value of all officially recognized final goods and services produced within a country in a year, or other given period of time."

lets compare: usa 15.68 trillion a year. germany 3.4 trillion a year
ALMOST 5 TIMES AS MUCH PRODUCTION. wow talk about a backfire. you come on here touting they can produce 70% of what we can and its actually only about 20%!

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...any+vs.+gdp+usa

what else dont you understand on the most simplistic levels that you are trying to educate us on?

i told you on the other thread these are deep waters you are not prepared to swim in.

so now that we determine that 70% is only 20%, what are your thoughts now?

Rance you still declare victory like Karl and Mitt.
Sorry I threw you off with the word output rather than export. Considering that we had been talking exports I thought you would be able to understand.But even if you want to talk GDP rather than export, my point still stands. The U.S. has 26 times more landmass and 4 times more people, yet our GDP is only 4.6 times more. So their rates of production are on par with ours with a socialist economy. But rather than having "47%ers", and massively high levels of poverty, and workers pulling down two jobs and having nothing to show for it, the german public has great worker benefits. Weeks of paid vacations, free healthcare, great education without the huge debt burden on graduates, maternity and paternity leave, 40 hour work weeks, and on and on. In Germany under a socialist system the majority of their citizens do better and better each year, while in the good ole USA under capitalism "the harder we work the behinder we get".

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by john Duemmer on 12-11-2013 09:17 PM:

I am seeing a shift in the liberal mindset.... They have gone from denying that Obama is a socialist to simply defending socialism. Seems like an admission to me.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside


Posted by rance56 on 12-11-2013 09:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Rance you still declare victory like Karl and Mitt.
Sorry I threw you off with the word output rather than export. Considering that we had been talking exports I thought you would be able to understand.But even if you want to talk GDP rather than export, my point still stands. The U.S. has 26 times more landmass and 4 times more people, yet our GDP is only 4.6 times more. So their rates of production are on par with ours with a socialist economy. But rather than having "47%ers", and massively high levels of poverty, and workers pulling down two jobs and having nothing to show for it, the german public has great worker benefits. Weeks of paid vacations, free healthcare, great education without the huge debt burden on graduates, maternity and paternity leave, 40 hour work weeks, and on and on. In Germany under a socialist system the majority of their citizens do better and better each year, while in the good ole USA under capitalism "the harder we work the behinder we get".



lies, we were talking exports and you cliamed how massive the amount of exports germny had and i showed you the usa was doing 50 billion dollars more a month. YOU then tried to state that that meant germany produced 70% of what the usa does. that is when I EDUCATED you that exports does not equal total production. ITS IN BLACK AND WHITE BELOW

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Well, Socialist Germany sets new record for massive exports:




quote:
Originally posted by rance56
lol, record exports huh?

Total German exports in October rose to €99.1 billion ($136 billion), a new all-time high.


and lookie here how much the usa is exporting

WASHINGTON, DC ---- In August 2013 the United States exported $189.2 billion of goods and services, slightly lower than July's exports of $189.3 billion.August's exports are marginally lower than June's all-time record high of $190.5 billion,



quote:
Originally posted by truly
Good info there Rance. Let's put this in perspective then, Germany, which is just a little bigger than twice the size of Georgia, and about one quarter the population of the United States can produce about 70% of our entire output.


BOOM. look at the last 2 words in your quote=ENTIRE OUTPUT. you are the one that thinks exports equal GDP. AGAIN I had to educate you. i think your credibility is now officaly beyond repair.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by Paul Frederick on 12-11-2013 09:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
The U.S. has 26 times more landmass and 4 times more people, yet our GDP is only 4.6 times more. So their rates of production are on par with ours with a socialist economy.


Rance, can you please help me with something: If we have 4 times the people they do, and our GDP is 4.6 times more than theirs, aren't we ahead of them in GDP by .6? How does that make them "on par" with us? That would make them behind us, not equal to or greater than us, right?

Of course I may be missing something, but I don't think so. I was never good at math so hopefully I can get some help.

__________________
Paul Frederick
319-371-6362


Posted by Bob Hennessey on 12-11-2013 09:24 PM:

WHY SOCIALISM FAILED
by Mark J. Perry, Ph.D.

Socialism is the Big Lie of the twentieth century. While it promised prosperity, equality and security, socialism delivered poverty, misery and tyranny. Equality was achieved only in the sense that everyone was equal in his or her misery. Socialism is now a bankrupt, discredited, and flawed nineteenth century theory that has failed miserably in countries around the world.

In the same way that a Ponzi scheme or chain letter initially succeeds but eventually collapses, socialism may show early signs of success. However, as we have seen recently, any initial success of collectivism quickly fades as the fundamental deficiencies of central planning emerge. It is the initial illusion of success that gives government intervention its pernicious, seductive appeal. In the long run, socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.

A chain letter or Ponzi scheme is unsustainable in the long run because it is based on faulty principles. Likewise, collectivism is unsustainable in the long run because it is a flawed theory. Socialism cannot and will not work in the long run because it is not consistent with fundamental principles of human behavior. The collapse of socialism can be traced to one critical defect that guarantees that it will always fail - it is a system that ignores incentives.

In a capitalist economy, incentives are of the utmost importance. Market prices, the profit-and-loss system of accounting and private property rights provide an efficient, interrelated system of incentives to guide and direct economic behavior. Capitalism is based on the theory that INCENTIVES MATTER!

Under socialism, incentives play a minimal role or are ignored totally. A centrally planned economy without market prices or profits, where property is owned by the state, is a system without an effective incentive mechanism to direct economic activity. By failing to emphasize incentives, socialism is a theory inconsistent with human nature and is therefore doomed to fail. Socialism is based on the theory that INCENTIVES DON'T MATTER!

In a radio debate several months ago with a Marxist professor from the University of Minnesota, I pointed out the obvious failures of socialism around the world in Cuba, Eastern Europe and China. At the time of our debate, Haitian refugees were risking their lives trying to get to Florida in homemade boats. Why was it, I asked him, that people were fleeing Haiti and travelling almost 500 miles by ocean to get to the "evil capitalist empire" when they were only 50 miles from the "workers paradise" of Cuba?

The Marxist admitted that many "socialist" countries around the world were failing. However, according to him, the reason for failure is not that socialism is deficient, but that the socialist economies are not practicing "pure" socialism. The perfect version of socialism would work; it is just the imperfect socialism that doesn't work. Marxists like to compare a theoretically perfect version of socialism with practical, imperfect capitalism which allows them to claim that socialism is superior to capitalism.

If perfection really were an available option, the choice of economic and political systems would be irrelevant. In a world with perfect beings and infinite abundance, ANY economic or political system would work perfectly - socialism, capitalism, fascism, communism or any other system would work perfectly. However, the choice of economic and polititcal institutions IS crucially relevant in an imperfect universe such as ours with imperfect beings and limited resources. Only in a world of scarcity is it essential for an economic system to be based on a clear incentive structure to promote economic efficiency. The real choice we face is between imperfect capitalism and imperfect socialism. Given that choice, the evidence of history overwhelmingly favors capitalism as the greatest wealth- producing economic system available.

The strength of capitalism can be attributed to a very clear incentive structure based upon the three Ps: 1) prices determined by market forces, 2) a profit-and-loss system of accounting and 3) private property rights. The failure of socialism can be traced to its neglect of these three incentive-enhancing components.

In a market economy, the price system coordinates and guides economic activity so flawlessly that most people don't appreciate the important role that market prices play. Market prices transmit information about relative scarcity and then efficiently coordinate economic activity. The economic content of prices provides incentives which promote economic efficiency.

For example, when the OPEC cartel restricted the supply of oil in the 1970s, oil prices rose dramatically. The higher price for oil and gasoline transmitted valuable information to both buyers and sellers. Consumers received a strong, clear message about the scarcity of oil by the higher prices at the pump and were forced to change their behavior dramatically. People reacted to the scarcity by driving less, carpooling more, taking public transportation, buying smaller cars, etc. Producers reacted to the higher price by increasing their efforts at exploration for more oil. In addition, higher oil prices gave producers an incentive to explore and develop alternative fuel and energy sources.

The information transmitted by higher oil prices provided the appropriate incentive structure to both buyers and sellers. Buyers increased their effort to conserve a now more precious resource and sellers increased their effort to find more of this now scarcer resource.

The only alternative to a market price is a controlled or fixed price which always transmits misleading information about relative scarcity. Inappropriate behavior results from a controlled price because false information has been transmitted by an artificial, non-market price.

Look at what happened during the 1970s when gas prices were controlled in the United States. Long lines developed at gas stations all over the country because the controlled price for gasoline was artificially low, which therefore transmitted misleading information about scarcity. The full impact of the true scarcity was not accurately transmitted because the controlled price was kept artificially low by government fiat. As Milton Friedman pointed out at the time, we could have eliminated the lines at the pump in one day by allowing the price to rise to clear the market.

From our experience with price controls on gasoline and the long lines at the pump and general inconvenience, we get an insight into what happens under socialism where every price in the economy is controlled. The collapse of socialism is due in part to the chaos and inefficiency that result from artificial prices. The information content of a controlled price is always distorted, which then distorts the incentives mechanism of prices under socialism. Administered prices are always either too high or too low, which then creates constant shortages and surpluses. Market prices are the only way to transmit information that will create the right incentives to ensure economic efficiency.

Socialism also collapsed because of its failure to operate under a competitive, profit- and-loss system of accounting. A profit system is a very effective monitoring mechanism which continually evaluates the economic performance of every business enterprise. The firms that are the most efficient and most successful at serving the public interest are rewarded with profits. Firms which operate inefficiently and fail to serve the public interest are penalized with losses.

By rewarding success and penalizing failure, the profit system provides a strong discipline mechanism which continually redirects resources away from weak, failing and inefficient firms towards those firms which are the most efficient and successful at serving the public. A competitive profit system ensures a constant reoptimization of resources and moves the economy toward greater levels of efficiency. Unsuccessful firms cannot escape the strong discipline of the marketplace under a profit/loss system. A competitive, market-based system forces companies to serve the public interest or suffer the consequences.

Under central planning, there is no profit-and-loss system of accounting to accurately measure the success or failure of various programs. Without profits, there is no way to discipline firms that fail to serve the public interest and no way to reward firms that do. There is no efficient way to determine which programs should be expanded and which ones should be contracted or terminated.

Without competition, centrally planned economies do not have an effective incentive structure to coordinate economic activity. Without incentives the results are a spiraling cycle of poverty and misery. Instead of continually re-allocating resources towards greater efficiency, socialism falls into a vortex of inefficiency and failure.

A third fatal defect of socialism is its blatant disregard for the role that private property rights play in creating incentives that foster economic growth and development. The failure of socialism around the world is a "tragedy of commons" on a global scale.

The "tragedy of the commons" refers to the British experience of the 16th century when certain grazing lands were communally owned by villages and were made available for public use. The land was quickly overgrazed and eventually became worthless as villagers exploited the communally owned resource.

The tragedy of publicly owned assets is that there are no incentives in place to encourage wise stewardship. Whereas private property creates incentives for conservation and the responsible use of property, public property encourages property to be used irresponsibly and wastefully. If everyone owns an asset, people act as if no one owns it. And when no one owns it, no one really takes care of it. Public ownership encourages neglect and mismanagement.

Since socialism, by definition, is a system marked by the "common ownership of the means of production", the failure of socialism is a "tragedy of the commons" on a national scale. Much of the economic stagnation of socialism can be traced to the failure to establish and promote private property rights.

As Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto remarked, you can travel in rural communities around the world and you will hear dogs barking, because even dogs understand property rights. It is only statist governments that have failed to understand property rights. Socialist countries are just now starting to recognize the importance of private property as they privatize assets and property in Eastern Europe.

Therefore, without the incentives of market prices, profit-and-loss accounting and well- defined property rights, socialist economies stagnate and wither. The economic atrophy that occurs under socialism is a direct consequence of its neglect of economic incentives.

No amount of natural resources is ever enough to compensate a country for its lack of an efficient system of incentives. Russia, for example, is one of the world's wealthiest countries in terms of natural resources; it has some of the world's largest reserves of oil, natural gas, diamonds and gold. It also has valuable farm land, lakes, rivers, streams across a land area that encompasses 11 times zones and yet it is on the verge of becoming a third world country. Natural resources are helpful, but the ultimate resources of any country are the unlimited resources of its people - human resources.

By their failure to foster, promote and nurture the human potential of their people through incentive-enhancing institutions, centrally planned economies deprive the human spirit of full development. Socialism fails because it kills and destroys the human spirit - just ask the people leaving Cuba in homemade rafts and boats.

As the former centrally planned economies move toward free markets, capitalism and democracy, they are looking to the United States for guidance and support during the transition. We have an unparalled 250-year tradition of open markets, market prices, private property and democracy. The United States is uniquely qualified to be the guiding light in the worldwide transition to freedom and liberty.

We have an obligation to continue to provide a framework of free markets and democracy for the global transition to freedom. Our responsibility to the rest of the world is to continue to fight the seductiveness of statism around the world and here at home. The seductive nature of statism continues to tempt and lure us into the Barmecidal illusion that the government can create wealth.

The temptress of socialism is constantly luring us with the offer: "give up a little of your freedom and I will give you a little more security". As the experience of this century has demonstrated, the bargain is tempting but never pays off. We end up losing both our freedom and our security.

Programs like socialized medicine, welfare, social security and minimum wage laws will continue to entice us because on the surface they appear to be expedient and beneficial. Those programs, like all socialist programs, will fail in the long run regardless of initial appearances. These programs are part of the Big Lie of socialism because they ignore the important role of incentives. Socialism will remain a constant temptation. We need to be vigilant in our fight against socialism not only around the globe but also here in the United States.

The global failure of socialism has begun a worldwide renaissance of freedom and liberty. For the first time in the history of the world, the day is coming very soon when a majority of the people in the world will live in free societies or societies rapidly moving towards freedom.

Capitalism will play a major role in the global revival of liberty and prosperity because it nurtures the human spirit, inspires human creativity and promotes the spirit of enterprise. By providing a powerful system of incentives that promote thrift, hard work and efficiency, capitalism creates wealth.

The evidence from history is very clear. The main difference between capitalism and socialism is this: Capitalism works

__________________
Ignorance: the lack of knowledge, education, etc.
Stupidity: lacking normal intelligence.
Intelligence: the ability to learn or understand.
You can't fix STUPID!


Posted by rance56 on 12-11-2013 09:24 PM:

BTW TRULY, HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU BEEN TO GERMANY?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-11-2013 09:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Paul Frederick
Rance, can you please help me with something: If we have 4 times the people they do, and our GDP is 4.6 times more than theirs, aren't we ahead of them in GDP by .6? How does that make them "on par" with us? That would make them behind us, not equal to or greater than us, right?

Of course I may be missing something, but I don't think so. I was never good at math so hopefully I can get some help.



you are absolutely right.

GDP per capital germany 41,514 per person 30th in world
GDP per capita USA 49,965 per person 18th in world

its not on par, by a long shot

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by Paul Frederick on 12-11-2013 09:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
you are absolutely right.

GDP per capital germany 41,514 per person 30th in world
GDP per capita USA 49,965 per person 18th in world

its not on par, by a long shot



Thanks, just making sure I can still read!

__________________
Paul Frederick
319-371-6362


Posted by truly on 12-11-2013 10:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The Seeker
Just to let people know. Germany has a CAPITALIST FORM OF ECONOMY. It is run on free enterprise. If you don't believe me, LOOK IT UP.
So Bob, do you think it is wrong of folks to suggest that if we have the same kind of healthcare that Germany has that would be a sign that we are slipping into socialism? That if we had the same rates of union participation that we would be slipping into socialism? That if we had similar gun control laws that we would be slipping into socialism?
If Germany isn't socialist then why are we so scared to copy the parts of their economic model that are clearly working?

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by truly on 12-11-2013 11:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Paul Frederick
Rance, can you please help me with something: If we have 4 times the people they do, and our GDP is 4.6 times more than theirs, aren't we ahead of them in GDP by .6? How does that make them "on par" with us? That would make them behind us, not equal to or greater than us, right?

Of course I may be missing something, but I don't think so. I was never good at math so hopefully I can get some help.

So Paul, that .6 difference means that their GDP is not on par with ours, then could you explain how they get so much more for their money? How is it that with, as you see it, such a substantially lower GDP, they can get free healthcare, vacations, maternity and paternity leave, lower retirement ages, better retirements, and all of the other perks that their government provides for them?

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by truly on 12-11-2013 11:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by michael.magorian
In case you haven't noticed, we as a country are paying more in taxes than any other country in history,
Hey Rance, you wanna get this one?

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by TomPurdy on 12-12-2013 12:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by TomPurdy
Truly, Don't just say I'm wrong be specific!! Show me where I'm wrong!!


Truly, I don't mean to dog you, but I'm afraid the question I posed to you will go unanswered!


Posted by rance56 on 12-12-2013 12:51 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
So Paul, that .6 difference means that their GDP is not on par with ours, then could you explain how they get so much more for their money? How is it that with, as you see it, such a substantially lower GDP, they can get free healthcare, vacations, maternity and paternity leave, lower retirement ages, better retirements, and all of the other perks that their government provides for them?


um, I get 4 weeks paid vacation, 6 paid sick days, and 9 paid holidays, I get 2 weeks paid paternity leave ad the wife gets like 3 months, I plan on retiring in my mid 50s, as far as perks, 7% 401k match dollar for dollar, 10% profit share dump each year, plus 3k a year into a health savings account.

just because you claims these things in Germany are better doenst make it so, and my benefits are for an average employee for my company.

btw, when was the last time you visited Germany?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-12-2013 01:09 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by The Seeker
WHY SOCIALISM FAILED
by Mark J. Perry, Ph.D.

At the time of our debate, Haitian refugees were risking their lives trying to get to Florida in homemade boats. Why was it, I asked him, that people were fleeing Haiti and travelling almost 500 miles by ocean to get to the "evil capitalist empire" when they were only 50 miles from the "workers paradise" of Cuba?




there it is, real world facts. nuff said!

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by conhtr1 on 12-12-2013 01:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
In Germany under a socialist system the majority of their citizens do better and better each year, while in the good ole USA under capitalism "the harder we work the behinder we get".

Bingo! You finally admitted Obama had been continuing to take us further down. There is hope for you yet truly.

__________________
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a closer look at the American Indian.”

- Henry Ford, founder – Ford Motor Corporation


Posted by conhtr1 on 12-12-2013 01:44 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Well, Socialist Germany sets new record for massive exports:
http://www.spiegel.de/international...e-a-937961.html

This while providing great healthcare, education, maternity (and Paternity) leave, vacations (hey America, remember when taking a vacation was the norm?), comfortable retirement, solid banking regulations, and more….

If capitalism is so much better than Socialism, why are poverty rates higher in the U.S. than in Germany?


great health care? maybe you should read up on their problems before posting about it.

a little quote from an article

"Chronically expensive

Inefficiency is as big a problem as injustice. Keeping Germany healthy is chronically expensive: this country has the fourth highest health expenses in the world and the compulsory individual fees, be they state or private, carry on rising faster than inflation.
http://www.thelocal.de/20100510/27107

__________________
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a closer look at the American Indian.”

- Henry Ford, founder – Ford Motor Corporation


Posted by truly on 12-12-2013 03:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
um, I get 4 weeks paid vacation, 6 paid sick days, and 9 paid holidays, I get 2 weeks paid paternity leave ad the wife gets like 3 months, I plan on retiring in my mid 50s, as far as perks, 7% 401k match dollar for dollar, 10% profit share dump each year, plus 3k a year into a health savings account.

just because you claims these things in Germany are better doenst make it so, and my benefits are for an average employee for my company.

btw, when was the last time you visited Germany?

So rance tell us just what you do for a living.

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!


Posted by rance56 on 12-12-2013 03:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by truly
So rance tell us just what you do for a living.


im a relationship manager for clients who have us manage their investments

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-12-2013 04:13 AM:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ List_...> ng_in_poverty


percentage of population living in poverty in Germany 15.5%


percentage of population living in poverty in usa 15.1%



is the truth in these people?


lets dig a little deeper?

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201...9/pove-n09.html

Although Germany is one of the richest countries in the world, many children live in poverty. This was confirmed by a recent report of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

Approximately 10 percent of German girls and boys live in families whose income lies below the poverty line. The benchmark used is the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) social measurement, according to which someone is poor if he or she receives less than half the median income. Of 29 participating OECD countries, Germany is ranked eleventh.

At the other pole of society, however, wealth is growing rapidly, thanks to the policies of the government parties in Berlin. According to rankings published in early October by Manager Magazin, the assets of the richest top 100 have increased in the past twelve months by 5.2 percent, to a record high of €336.6 billion [$US 449.8 billion]. There are 135 billionaires living in Germany, and, according to a study by Credit Suisse, some 1.7 million “dollar millionaires.”



WHAT? THE POOR GETTING POORER, AND THE RICH GETTING RICHER? SURELY NOT? THATS A CAPITILIST PIG PROBLEM?

LOL, THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU READ PROPAGANDA AND DONT KNOW THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU NEVER EVEN BEEN TO THE COUNTRY

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rance56 on 12-12-2013 04:31 AM:

WAIT, THERE IS MORE. BIG GERMAN COMPANIES STICKING IT TO THE WORKING CLASS!

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201...2/germ-d02.html



The legal changes announced by the new government will hardly improve the situation of workers, should they come into force. The warm welcome given last week by IG Metall Congress delegates to Chancellor Angela Merkel and Social Democratic leader Sigmar Gabriel made clear that the unions are being fully integrated into the offensive against the working class planned by the new grand coalition.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by Redneck Mafia on 12-12-2013 06:12 AM:

Wow ! Almost needed a calculator you guys have been busy .
Truly You can move to New York City I believe it was a Socialist they elected as major .

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
"TEAM MAFIA"
*NATIONAL GRNITECH GRCH GRNITECH(5) HALL OF FAME PKC PLATIUM CH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMIFINALIST, 2016 UKC TOP 20, 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE, 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4, 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION, 2019 AUTUMN OAKS NATIONAL GRNITE CH, 2019 PKC WORLD CH SEMIFINALIST. 2021 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4.
*PKC WORLD CHAMPION PLATNIUM CHAMPION GRNITECH SHACK'S HEATHER ISLAND SOUTHERN STOGIE
2021 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION, 2022 PKC WORLD CHAMPION, 2022 MO PKC STATE LEADER PRO SPORT TRUCK WINNER

RIP
*GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA PKC HALL OF FAME REPRODUCER INDUCTED 2022
*GRNITECH CH PKC SILVER CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION, 2020 MO PKC STATE LEADER


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30 PM. Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »
Show all 101 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club