UKC Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 40 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- question on rule (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=459012)


Posted by l.lyle on 10-31-2011 02:58 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by jackbob42
Let me throw another wrench in........

If a dog trees a coon or two , off by himself without getting with the other dogs at any time , considered to be working as " part of cast " ?
Or is he considered a "non-working" dog?

That is a good question. Independent dogs that won't work with others fall in that categorie every time.


Posted by Okie Dawg on 10-31-2011 03:21 AM:

So does the dog that has been trailing the coon for an hour loose his strike points after an hour? That could be in a pull up short dogs favor while a real track dog did his job.
I have seen a lot more pull up short dogs than real good trackers on old hard tracks in the hunts here.
I haven't seen any that would just boo hooo for are hour though. This will be an interesting thread.

__________________
UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL
Grady Jarvis
808 N. Main St.
Tonkawa Okla. 74653
580-628-0507
CH 'PR' Grady's Dark Woods Waylon -Bluetic

NITECH 'PR' Grady's Insane Tinker Bell (Tink) - Treeing walker --Okla. State Hunt open redg. winner

'PR' Grady's Barley - Treeing Walker


Posted by Tim MACHA on 10-31-2011 05:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by jackbob42
Let me throw another wrench in........

If a dog trees a coon or two , off by himself without getting with the other dogs at any time , considered to be working as " part of cast " ?
Or is he considered a "non-working" dog?



If the dog got treed, then the strike would start over. We are talking about a dog that holds strike open for an hour without treeing.

__________________
OFFICIAL FIELD TESTER FOR LEMS LIGHTS

Good people do not need laws to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws (Plato)


Posted by nccoonhunter197 on 10-31-2011 07:54 AM:

TWO COON RULE WAS BY FAR A BETTER WAY OF DETERMINING IF THE NEXT DOG TO STRIKE GETS 100 OR 25. YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER, YOU ARE HUNTING THE SAME WOODS UNTIL THE HOUR IS UP ON THIS TRAILING DOG. UNLESS YOU HAVE ALOT OF COON, THEN ONE HOUR IN ONE SPOT IS A LONG TIME TO BE WAITING AND ALOT OF TERRITORY COVERED. SORRY, BUT IF A DOG CAN'T TREE A COON AFTER TRAILING FOR ONE HOUR, IT NEEDS TO BE MINUSED, TIMEOUT CALLED, AND THE HANDLER GIVEN AN HOUR TO CATCH HIS DOG. JMO

__________________
"To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt



Brian Teague 252-649-3050


Posted by Buckshot on 10-31-2011 08:30 AM:

Wasn't the old wording of the rule a snafu in the final cast of the World Hunt last year or year before last??

If I remember right, it was interpreted one way the week of the World Hunt and applied differently on the final cast.

I think UKC even has had issues with both wordings of the rule. LOL


Posted by GA DAWG on 10-31-2011 11:59 AM:

Yes buckshot your right.
Two coon rule ain't really right either. Specially if my dog trees the first one. Then I cut back loose and strike for a 25.. Then another dog is treed and we see its coon. It gets to strike back for a 100. Rule needs done away with all together. Strike back in for next available any time.

__________________
Michael Ghorley


Posted by Bob Hennessey on 10-31-2011 03:59 PM:

Where's Allen?

__________________
Ignorance: the lack of knowledge, education, etc.
Stupidity: lacking normal intelligence.
Intelligence: the ability to learn or understand.
You can't fix STUPID!


Posted by Okie Dawg on 10-31-2011 04:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by GA DAWG
Yes buckshot your right.
Two coon rule ain't really right either. Specially if my dog trees the first one. Then I cut back loose and strike for a 25.. Then another dog is treed and we see its coon. It gets to strike back for a 100. Rule needs done away with all together. Strike back in for next available any time.



That is what I would be infavor of.

__________________
UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL
Grady Jarvis
808 N. Main St.
Tonkawa Okla. 74653
580-628-0507
CH 'PR' Grady's Dark Woods Waylon -Bluetic

NITECH 'PR' Grady's Insane Tinker Bell (Tink) - Treeing walker --Okla. State Hunt open redg. winner

'PR' Grady's Barley - Treeing Walker


Posted by patches9452 on 10-31-2011 10:09 PM:

i got knocked out of the finals last year because of the 2 coon rule... i treed the first coon and the 4th coon the dog that treed the 3rd coon and the 5th got to strike back in for 100 beat me by 25pts... we made 5 trees and looked at 5 coon and never had 2 dogs on any tree.... so i say the 2 coon rule sucks


Posted by T Felderman on 10-31-2011 10:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tim MACHA
We are talking about a dog that holds strike open for an hour without treeing.


Thats the way I have been judging it. And I did have to use it once this year.


Posted by Clay Lautzenhiser on 11-01-2011 12:36 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by The Seeker
Where's Allen?


He took a few days off.

__________________
352-400-2374 Cell
PKC#50739


Posted by Bob Hennessey on 11-01-2011 07:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Clay Lautzenhiser
He took a few days off.

I guess it wouldn't make any difference what he said, half of the people would say, "I ain't going to judge it that way". LOL!

__________________
Ignorance: the lack of knowledge, education, etc.
Stupidity: lacking normal intelligence.
Intelligence: the ability to learn or understand.
You can't fix STUPID!


Posted by Todd K / UKC on 11-04-2011 08:48 PM:

Hey all....it may be written poorly but it was written that way more than 23 years ago and hasn't been a problem in the time I've been here. I guess I can see why it's causing some confusion if you read it literally but commone sense would suggest that because it's a "non-working dog rule" that strike points are not open again until the dog that is "non-working" has been doing so for one hour.

So Tim and Joey and some of the others are correct. You would technically need to know at what time a dog struck so that you could determine at what time other dogs can be struck in over him.

In the past whenever I saw this rule applied it was always because two coon had been seen so the time keeping wasn't an issue. Hope this helps.

__________________
If we're not suppose to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat?


Posted by Clay Lautzenhiser on 11-04-2011 08:55 PM:

Thanks Todd. Well I guess I was wrong. I read it as written ;-)
No that I know how they want it judged I will judge it that way from now on.

__________________
352-400-2374 Cell
PKC#50739


Posted by on 11-04-2011 09:32 PM:

That’s all any of us can do Clay. Judge as best as we can interpret it until we find out different.

I have used it twice sense the rule has changed and both times the other three dogs were struck with in a few minutes of the hunt starting and where running for the rest of the time.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 40 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club