UKC Forums - Scoring question!!!!!!!!!!!

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Scoring question!!!!!!!!!!! (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=374296)

Posted by Fred Harroun on 09-06-2010 03:31 AM:

coon would only get burned if he came into contact with another wire.if he was on one wire he would not get burnt.it like when birds light on wires they dont get hit unless they touch another wire.

__________________
fred harroun
319-325-3786
Plotts
NPHA
APA

Posted by oklared on 09-06-2010 03:37 AM:

IF A RED DOG WAS TREED-PLUS IT, OTHER WISE MINUS (just kiddin) ha

Posted by Les Young09 on 09-07-2010 04:00 PM:

Blueticking It

I said majority of cast didn't see it go from pole dogs were treed on down the wire to the pole coon was found in. Meant crossing out on wires to the other pole. Never said coming down pole. If it had came down pole it would have to gotten to the other pole by ground which dang sure would be minused.

Posted by Matt Mays on 09-07-2010 04:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by brogy
I figure it needs to be minused as well. I'm surprised so many are saying to minus. Not too often you see so many UKC hunters so willing to take they're minus.

Everybody takes their minus on this computer but the cry baby comes out in the woods

__________________
Matt Mays (205) 807-3046

Posted by redtide on 09-07-2010 06:36 PM:

Re: MR JACK

quote:
Originally posted by Tony Dominguez
YOU PLUS IT BECAUSE U SAW THE COON AND IT ISN'T NO MORE THAN ONE TREE AWAY, AND I HAVE SEEN SQUIRRELS CROSS SO I THINK A COON CAN TO.THEY ALSO CONNECT.

THANKS, TONY

The "1 tree" rule should apply to this situation...though it doesn't specify power poles, the INTENT of the rule does apply. Of course, you have to be careful applying INTENT to rules...some can abuse that.

If you believe the coon went up that pole and travelled down the line to the next one (which is very possibly what happened), then plus 'em. If you think they treed a tap, minus 'em. It's not likely that the coon was tapping poles looking for one to go up. In the end, it would require a vote of the cast which SHOULD be decided based on your application of the intent of the rule...but very likely would be decided based on whose dog had first tree, was in the lead, etc.

__________________
Redtidedawgs
James C. Guy
Wetumpka, Alabama
334-580-7940

https://redtidekennels.wordpress.com/home/

http://i53.tinypic.com/xpq06h.jpg
NITECH 'PR' THORN'S ROLEX (R.I.P.)

Posted by on 09-07-2010 09:14 PM:

Re: Re: MR JACK

quote:
Originally posted by redtide
The "1 tree" rule should apply to this situation...though it doesn't specify power poles, the INTENT of the rule does apply. Of course, you have to be careful applying INTENT to rules...some can abuse that.

If you believe the coon went up that pole and travelled down the line to the next one (which is very possibly what happened), then plus 'em. If you think they treed a tap, minus 'em. It's not likely that the coon was tapping poles looking for one to go up. In the end, it would require a vote of the cast which SHOULD be decided based on your application of the intent of the rule...but very likely would be decided based on whose dog had first tree, was in the lead, etc.

One tree means the branches of one tree are touching the branches of another tree. So if one pole was laying over and touching the other I'd buy it, but not two separate poles, and calling them connected by the wires. The coon tapped the pole the dogs were on, and went to the next pole. It's simple, you can't plus dogs in the woods for falling short?!?!?!

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page