UKC Forums Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 83 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Obama/Blagoveich Discussion (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=244835)


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 03:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
rance,
GOP in the Obama cabinet include, Sec. of Defense Gates, Sec. of Transportation LaHood, 14 yrs. GOP congressman from peoria, il. know him, most likely National Security and Vet. Affairs are that, a centerist cabinet, is lacking southerners though.... this is a group that will not be just the yes man, thank you mam, ok mam type that has come to be the model in d.c., more diverse in thought-makeup...



please again, lets try to stick to the point. you said there are several republicans in obamas cabinet. since when did 2 become several? ive never or dont think anyone else woudl confuse 2 with several. just a weak liberal attempt to decieve folks. what makes that even more laughable when you say several republicans is that one of the 2 you reference is robert gates. yes gates is a republican holdover, but he is a lifelong cia man, has worked under both republican and democratic presidents, and he is a registered INDEPENDANT. please take your "several republicans in obamas comments" back to whatever lib propaganda website you got it from.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 04:24 PM:

rance,
try looking in webster for word meanings, several is more than one.... mentioned 4... look at your 1st grade math book, 1,2,3,4.... a plus that he is appointing moderates that will look at the issues from both sides and not stiffled by group think that is rife in most institutional settings, look up group think too-lo.... like said, time will tell, also if someone disagrees with you that does not make one a liberal-maybe just more open minded... personally am-have been a registered republican for many yrs., but am independent as a voter, a libertarian on constitutional issues, but a populist on areas of social need, like said now is time to come together to move nation-world forward, not be entrenched in ideaology at the expense of pragmatism and positive outcomes...


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 04:42 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
rance,
try looking in webster for word meanings, several is more than one.... mentioned 4... look at your 1st grade math book, 1,2,3,4.... a plus that he is appointing moderates that will look at the issues from both sides and not stiffled by group think that is rife in most institutional settings, look up group think too-lo.... like said, time will tell, also if someone disagrees with you that does not make one a liberal-maybe just more open minded... personally am-have been a registered republican for many yrs., but am independent as a voter, a libertarian on constitutional issues, but a populist on areas of social need, like said now is time to come together to move nation-world forward, not be entrenched in ideaology at the expense of pragmatism and positive outcomes...



its scary you teach our kids, the generally accepted meaning is more than 2. i.e.-http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/several

who are the 4 in his cabinet?please name their names. again you are either grossly mistaken or lieing, which is? no where will you find info stating 4 republicans in obamas cabinet.

snake in the grass.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 04:54 PM:

don't teach children.... mentioned all 4, Nat. security advisor, veterans affairs, transportation, defense, 1,2,3,4, again a moderate cabinet not driven by idealogy-partisanship.... several is indicative of more than one, not seven.... not going to result to negatives, name calling, always respect the thoughts-ideas of others, even if not in agreement with them... bottom line is Obama is going to be the president, like it or not, have always supported whoever holds the office, but may disagree with policies, important in a free society that the elctorate holds those elected accountable, cornerstone of freedom, a responsibility as well as a right...


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 05:07 PM:

you are referncing positions and calling those folks republicans and you dotn even know their names. again laughable that you just throw info out there wihtout even knowing what you are throwing. gates is very dispustable as calling him a republican appointee. shineski-which is the appointee to the vet affairs is a career military man not a politician-so how is he a republican, same witj basically with james jones.

how it all plays out is anyones guess, but the claim that there are several(4) republicans in obamas cabinet is not debatable and is a flat out lie.

you can also look at these picks as status qou, really no reformers that obama promised.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 05:41 PM:

rance,
give it up brother, quit being a hater, sure that I know the names or can look them up, my pt. is-has been that this cabinet is moderate and not partisan idealogues, you have validated that very thing with your comments sir, no matter what it seems like you are going to try to find something to pick apart and rally against, being a sore loser will not get you or anyone one else anywhere, if you look for negatives that is all that you will find, try coming out of the dark and into the light... again, time will tell, performance-not ideology will be the judge, much more concerned about outcomes than political philosophy-partisan affiliation, proof in the pudding, not the name on the box it comes in...


Posted by liberalcreek on 12-20-2008 05:59 PM:

Folks, Read the posts made by Nelson and Smokey carefully., These are the type of people our founding fathers warned us about. These are the mindsets that will allow our freedoms to be removed one by one and overtake a country without a shot ever being fired.

__________________
Nuthin' like a coon treed on Liberal Creek


Posted by dkrause on 12-20-2008 06:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by liberalcreek
Folks, Read the posts made by Nelson and Smokey carefully., These are the type of people our founding fathers warned us about. These are the mindsets that will allow our freedoms to be removed one by one and overtake a country without a shot ever being fired.


agreed!!, any semi automatic or pump gun is capable of 60 rounds a min, apparently they think we all should be hunting with single shots and bolt actions.

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by Josh Flatten

OOOOOOOOYYEEEEEAAAA, Macho Man Randy Savage. I think of that dude every time I see a post from Jim Hill.


http://studly1.mybrute.com
try it you'll like it


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 06:10 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
rance,
give it up brother, quit being a hater, sure that I know the names or can look them up, my pt. is-has been that this cabinet is moderate and not partisan idealogues, you have validated that very thing with your comments sir, no matter what it seems like you are going to try to find something to pick apart and rally against, being a sore loser will not get you or anyone one else anywhere, if you look for negatives that is all that you will find, try coming out of the dark and into the light... again, time will tell, performance-not ideology will be the judge, much more concerned about outcomes than political philosophy-partisan affiliation, proof in the pudding, not the name on the box it comes in...



ron, how many times are you going to restate the obvious, we need to come to together blah blah blah, kum by ya my lord crap on here.

wether his cabinet is goign to be moderate or not is left to be seen, MY POINT is you specifically said there were several republicans in his cabinet. which is a complete falsehood.

there is ONE-the transportation secretary! gates on the other hand is a strecth.
the other 2 you mentioned are career military men, how can that make them republicans. im not going to give up when you are telling falshoods and lies on here and try to sugarcoat it with smoke and mirrors.

point blank, yes or no, do you stand behind your statement that there are 4 republicans in obamas cabinet- YES or NO.
just like obama, you need to learn there is a lot of power in answering a question with one simple word.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 06:21 PM:

rance,
give up brother, you have done kicked the dead horse, it's long dead.... makes no difference if the cabinet wears boxer, jockeys, or none at all, party affiliation-not the issue, performance is, don't care what party etc..., just what might happen, find something else to pick, maybe your nose-lo... look at what is inside the box, not the box itself... again-hope-pray for the best for all, we all move upward-onward and not be divided by labels etc... wish you the very best as well as everyone else...


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 06:25 PM:

rance,
believe that two are sure republicans and two as you have identified are military and not political, but may lean toward gop... again not a big issue as to what color the uniform is, but how well can play the game... hopefully the best people to do the job and not based upon poltical affiliation as the selection criteria....


Posted by mr.p on 12-20-2008 06:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by liberalcreek
Obama = CROOK="Chicago thug" political machine

Anyone notice how all these crooks are ties together??

Obama,Rezko, Blago-,Ayers, etc, etc, etc.

And yet,somehow, Obama claims to be as pure as the wind driven snow.


SURE.


I was always taught you are known by the company you keep.

hee hee he ok

__________________
mr.p


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 06:39 PM:

lol, you use 2 completely different posts to answer a simple yes or no question, and still never did. i think you would do well illinios politics.

never trust a man who wont give you a straight answer.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 06:49 PM:

the nature of politics is to never be pinned down, speak in glittering generalties and not locked definitives, all for everyone... same everywhere-all parties, not just illinois...
told you what believe to be what you asked, two in gop fold, two lean that way, can't tell more than I know sir, again key is what they may do, performance and not how they may be dressed or if mounted on an ass or an elephant, but that move in the right direction to lead regardless of political affiliation, needs of nation must trump partisanship....


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 07:03 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rrs
the nature of politics is to never be pinned down, speak in glittering generalties and not locked definitives, all for everyone... same everywhere-all parties, not just illinois...
told you what believe to be what you asked, two in gop fold, two lean that way, can't tell more than I know sir, again key is what they may do, performance and not how they may be dressed or if mounted on an ass or an elephant, but that move in the right direction to lead regardless of political affiliation, needs of nation must trump partisanship....



ron, this isnt about an indepth conversation on the merits of obamas cabinet, its about your comment saying it is made up of several republicans, then not simply answering yes or no if you stand behind that comment.

Gates is not a sure fire republican
shineski is a military man-outside of YOU telling us he leads to the GOP, what makes him a republican appopintee, same with james?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 07:12 PM:

so what, sorry if my understanding of party affiliation does not agree with yours, if you want want me to be incorrect by your definition- so be it... best I can do is two gop, believe that gates is in that camp with lahood, and two that lean toward the gop, as you have indicated... will stand corrected under your criteria of party affiliation-membership... again, not sure what difference the labels make, more interested in the soup than the can it comes in.... will be wrong if that is what you want to hear when applying your strict definitions that may differ from mine considering party-affiliation...


Posted by MikeO on 12-20-2008 07:28 PM:

blago for vice pres!


rrs would vote for that ticket. LOL

__________________
Home of these Hamilton county treeing walkers.
GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' OWEN'S STYLISH NOCTURNAL SHAKER.

And the pup 'pr' Owen's Rock River Ace...

Mike Owen owner/handler. hunting in style (WALKER STYLE)


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 08:02 PM:

mike,
have yet to vote for blago, by the way voted for keyes when he ran against obama for the senate... looks like blago in it until the end regardless of what happens to the state, hope he gets the cell next to ryan, course that is if he is proven guilty in a court, could be impeached and than tried in criminal court, don't see how he can skate on this, but in illinois strange things happen in the world of politics...


Posted by rance56 on 12-20-2008 08:09 PM:

ron,

you stated something on here that was completely false and you got called out on it. gates could be seen as a republican, depends on how you view it. but the other two, give me a break, and to make the claim there are several republicans in obamas cabinet is completely false. if that was the case there would be numerous articles referencing it. can you please provide one credible link that stats the cabinet has several or more than 2 republicans in it?

and my definition aside, just what defiention period does shineski and james fall as a republican under?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 08:23 PM:

rance,
don't make such a big deal out of nothing.... believe that gates is a a gop guy as is lahood and that the two miltary men lean that way, if you want me be to be wrong will be that to make you feel better and a winner if you like... do not know if any have an elephant tattoed on their buttocks, you are making something out of nothing... my contention is simply that the Obama cabinet is moderate, not doctrinaire or hard core partisan... not sure how republican or non the 4 gentleman mentioned are in their core values, but do believe they tend more toward the gop than demo... again, my contention is more about moderation than affiliation, if I did not state correctly, respond correctly, etc. apologize for the error, if my intent did not agree with my words....


Posted by bandithunter on 12-20-2008 08:34 PM:

Rrs, I think the point he's making is you were never one to let the truth get in the way of your agenda. Me, I would never say that, I'm much too polite. Smokey, you ready to give up your little 2 auto? Quite capable of 60 rounds a minute. Think before you speak.


Posted by rrs on 12-20-2008 08:43 PM:

truth often in the eye of the beholder.... bottom line is never intended to state a non-truth, only that we are missing the more important issue and getting hung up on what is much less important... by the way, because you or I do not accept something does not make it untrue or you or I that either.... don't really have an agenda, if did it would not be based upon untruths, that is the truth...


Posted by trackdriver on 12-20-2008 09:51 PM:

Why rrs? You're trying to reason with these mccain/palin supporters. Good luck!

__________________
Never forget Never surrender.... The red white and blue!


Posted by PlottChaser on 12-20-2008 10:38 PM:

being from southern il none of this comes as a surprise to me. how the state votes and thinks is always controlled by the chicago machine which is as corrupt as gov't gets. the thoughts of rural so. il. never get told or shown on the nationlay level. in fact there is a lot of talk down here about wishing we could split the state into North IL and South IL. I for one am at the top of the listof people wishing that could happen. then and only then could we in the southern part of the state truly be represented


Posted by liberalcreek on 12-20-2008 11:08 PM:

Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI


http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/20...-fbi/#more-8116

__________________
Nuthin' like a coon treed on Liberal Creek


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 AM. Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 83 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club