UKC Forums - What is the correct scoring

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- What is the correct scoring (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=217638)

Posted by runnin rebels on 07-09-2008 02:06 AM:

here you go elvis

So you give the dog the benefit of the doubt (pointswise) -50 instead of -125. But by giving him that same benefit of the doubt you are placing him on the tree with off game.

__________________
GRNITECH PR. RUNNIN REBEL TCSC OLD BLUE 2012 World Hunt Qualified / Top 20
NITECH PR. THE RUNNIN REBEL COWBOY JR DOG 2012 World Hunt Qualified

Posted by MikeO on 07-09-2008 02:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
Well he doesn't get scratched because you have no way of knowing if he was treed under the possum. He may have been split tree 30 feet away!

jims right ive seen this ruled on by a fair and honest moh with years of experience.... c takes his minus for leaving tree whatever position he was treed in.... no scratch.

__________________
Home of these Hamilton county treeing walkers.
GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' OWEN'S STYLISH NOCTURNAL SHAKER.
And the pup 'pr' Owen's Rock River Ace...

Mike Owen owner/handler. hunting in style (WALKER STYLE)

Posted by Nathan Lattimer on 07-09-2008 02:37 AM:

Sorry Elvis you shoulda gave me a heads up, I coulda stoked the fire a little! LOL! I'm sure Jim could handle it!

I personally don't agree with the "don't move up tree position rule". I say if you want the 2 started on your dog because he's not at the tree he was declared on I say they should get moved to 125. Basically they're just getting 2 more minutes for their dog to get treed.

I also don't like the fact that a A and B dog can be declared treed on C dog's locate (granted they are barking up as well but they can't be treed on their own locate) and C trees in for 50 and stays there as A and B go boo hooing thru the country. I also feel that if there is one dog at a tree they should get 125. Who cares if they treed last at least they stayed.

JUST MY OPINIONS, SORRY TO GET OFF TOPIC.

__________________
***GRNTCH LATE NITE BIG BUBBA 6/15/97 - 12/24/09***

Posted by Wingman66 on 07-09-2008 02:40 AM:

Nathan..send me the email addy again for the column my computer tower fried and I lost all my addys...thanks wingman66@hotmail.com

__________________
I have to say yall got a good little support group going. Huddle together so yall can keep warm...trackdriver

"Kim Jong-Un speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.” An actual sitting US President said that. Let that sink in.

Posted by 1939 on 07-09-2008 03:35 AM:

Maybe dog c was never actually treed, his handler just pitched him.LOL!

__________________
Ignorant-lacking knowledge,education,or understanding.
Stupid- lacking normal intelligence or understanding.
You can fix ignorance but you can't fix stupid.

Posted by gfults on 07-09-2008 09:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by elvis
you guys are no fun.
I could use a lil help getting JiM fired up on occasion.

I usually get him fired up on conversations like this. lol But I happen to agree with him on this one.
One point I havent seen mentioned is that when dog C left and was minused, he was scored on that tree then and there. He cant bescored twice on the same tree unless of course he returns to the tree. Also , as far as moving him up, who knows for sure that dog B wasnt split from dog A and dog C was treed with dog B?? Meaning, dog C would still only be moved up to 75. I think the rules say the tree speaks for itself.

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page