UKC Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- What do you call an accurate Dog? (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=132407)


Posted by sheepster on 02-01-2007 08:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rocky tanner
How would ?

19 out of 20 be considered "above average"
17 out of 20 good
15 out of 20 fair

I promise you 15 out of 20 is above the true average.

The other thing to consider is how many turnouts did it take to make 20 trees.

If I had a dog that had 19 out 20 coons on 20 turnouts I would own the coonhunts. Getting beat would be very rare for a man that has this. It's hard to imagine even being cheated out of many.

What if they had 19 out of 20 coons and the other 1 was an oppossum? I personally would rather walk to a slick tree every now and then.

According to some previous posts about Walker dogs by Sheep I would think the average would be 10 out of 20 or less.

Not an acceptable average , but the average still the same.



My female, if turned loose alone, and hunted reguarly, averages out of 20 turnouts, 18 coons seen. Out of 19 trees, 18 coon seen. Maybe a possom sometimes.

__________________
In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
-- Mark Twain


Posted by John Vaught on 02-01-2007 08:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sheepster
winning in competition has very little to do with Accuracy and Consisntency. It has a lot more to do with stuff like

1. Handling (first and foremost)
2. loudness (hard to call a dog treed that you can't hear on the other side of a mountain)
3. quickness to locate the tree
4. Not leaveing the tree come a Hurricane or World war 3.
5. Babbling (first strike)

OLE SHEEP HAS IT FIGURED OUT.....GO SHEEP......TELL THEM HOW IT IS

__________________
John M. Vaught


Posted by rocky tanner on 02-01-2007 08:18 PM:

10-4 .

Keep 'em in the woods.

19 out of 20 ain't too bad. By yourself with just you and your dog. I'd still like my chances. With an accurate dog against all these tree grabbers. JMO

Can't help volume and quickness to locate.

Still think 15 out of 20 is above the average that's out there.


Posted by berger on 02-01-2007 08:37 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by honalieh
If you walk into a tree EXPECTING to see a coon, you've probably got a pretty accurate dog!

If you walk into a tree HOPING to see a coon, you probably don't have an accurate dog.





honalieh you are absolutely correct!!!





quote:
Originally posted by miner49er
I would like to hunt some of the Northern dogs in my country for 30 nights and see how many coon they tree, not that they couldn't but I believe it would take some time to acclimate themselves to this area and the coon being scarce.


More then likely your correct on this statement for most hounds.
The consistent coondogs will tree coons in scarce coon or thick coon and won't need time to acclimate themselves to the area. They go looking to get treed with a coon they don't know if it's north or south coon scent is all the same.

__________________
Tree Jar'n Black and Tans
Home of Tree Jar'n Coonhound Kennels


319-201-8445


Posted by blueticker on 02-01-2007 09:56 PM:

I have hunted with many of those so called accurate hounds. It's just that their owners have a tough time remembering those three slick trees in a row. That means they have to tree 57 trees with coon in them to have that 95% accuracy rating. Don't bring those super hounds to this country, you will be disapointed.


Posted by GA DAWG on 02-01-2007 10:03 PM:

Over half the dogs on this thread are over 90% accurate.Now thats funny right there.I dont care who ya are!!!!!!! Maybe there are more world champs just tied out behind the barn than I thought LOL LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by John D on 02-01-2007 10:17 PM:

I don't like the choices because it only counts out of trees made.

I'd count the number of trees made with coon in them versus the number of times the dog is cut loose.

A dog quitting a track and coming in, or one that has to be called in because it doesn't appear he'll ever end the track, is no better than one that slick trees, to me.

__________________

Click here to visit The B&T Coonhunters Message Forum for news, views, open discussion, ads, and event winners in the B&T Breed (Registration, with your full name, required)


Click here to see my Dog List


Posted by GA DAWG on 02-01-2007 10:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by John D
I don't like the choices because it only counts out of trees made.

I'd count the number of trees made with coon in them versus the number of times the dog is cut loose.

A dog quitting a track and coming in, or one that has to be called in because it doesn't appear he'll ever end the track, is no better than one that slick trees, to me.

TRUE. One had better finish all tracks it strikes. If they strike and quite its just as bad as a slick tree!!


Posted by locknut on 02-01-2007 10:43 PM:

Sheep----------I'd have to disagree with you on this one. In my likited experience in the competition hunts, it's been my experience that accuracy and consistency are the 2 most important things a hound can have going for it to be a consistent winner in the hunts. Slick handling, babbling, and volume (and also ill temperment) can get you an occassional win, but there won't be any regularity in going to the pay window.


Posted by Chiggers on 02-01-2007 10:47 PM:

Re: Forget the numbers!

quote:
Originally posted by honalieh
If you walk into a tree EXPECTING to see a coon, you've probably got a pretty accurate dog!

If you walk into a tree HOPING to see a coon, you probably don't have an accurate dog.

When people start talking about numbers and percentages, the lies and excuses start coming into play.
You either see the coon (100%), or you don't (0%). I don't accept very many dont's.

I usually know if I have a den before I walk in, because I know my dog, and I usually know the woods, and where the dens are! If I have to walk to a tree with a confidence of 70%, 80%, etc., then I don't fully trust the dog to show me a coon. If that's the case, the lack of confidence is probably justified by past performance.

I Agree. There are a lot of times that I know a dog has a coon when they tree and others times I know they may or may not have it by the way they come on a tree.

__________________
Perry Metcalf.. Go Big Blue !


Posted by jesse walter on 02-01-2007 11:47 PM:

btt

__________________
BUTTERCREEK ENGLISH KENNELS
GRNTCH GRCH JONES RAIS'IN CANE
2011 UKC Performance Sire, PKC S.S sire
NTCH CH BUTTERCREEKS BIG WIN


Posted by Lee Currens Jr. on 02-01-2007 11:51 PM:

finley river will probabley have to get a show dog


Posted by EnglishTamlin on 02-02-2007 03:11 AM:

Here in Ontario i would say if your dog trees on 17 out of 20 tree's you do have a good dog, coons up here are hard to find later in the season(snow) but the ones you find are good coons with a heavy grade coat on em, earlier in the season when the corn is prime you will do really well and will expect walking to every tree gauranteed one or more coons.


Pr English Tamlin'
Hunt Em English

__________________
Kids who Hunt, Trap and Fish Don't mug little Ol' ladies!
'Pr English Tamlin'
Ryan Tamlin


Posted by Thenglishrules on 02-02-2007 03:29 AM:

Location does not matter. If I take a dog to ky or where ever they are scarce then I up my chances of not getting a bark correct?? And thats cause they are scarce or not moving/present. It doesn't mean the dog is a idiot...I mean it aint his fault they are scarce and he don't know any difference in region...come on, some of us need to get real LOL!!!

__________________
Get to work on time...Hunt English


Posted by oliesmith on 02-02-2007 10:58 AM:

i have hunted forty + YEARS and have a hundred dollar bill and a steak dinner if you come up here in mongo in and show me 20 coon in a row or even 18 out of 20 come on down give me a call olie smith 260-562-3264


Posted by chosen2 on 02-02-2007 02:58 PM:

During kill season, my hound's will have the meat at every time they tree, but when Im comp hunting I get some slick tree's. I think during kill season the dog is more relaxed and just goes with the flow. But comp. hunting I think but's more stress on the dog, when thier's different dog's and handler's to work with.

__________________
jeff j


Posted by jesse walter on 02-03-2007 09:26 PM:

btt

__________________
BUTTERCREEK ENGLISH KENNELS
GRNTCH GRCH JONES RAIS'IN CANE
2011 UKC Performance Sire, PKC S.S sire
NTCH CH BUTTERCREEKS BIG WIN


Posted by Rusty Johnson on 02-03-2007 10:58 PM:

Whoever voted for 10 out of 20 must be real easy to please!

__________________
Redticker


Posted by Vic Stoll on 02-04-2007 02:26 PM:

Averaged out over the course "AN ENTIRE YEAR", if a dog finishes 9 out of 10 strikes and you see a coon on the outside of 6 of those 9 finished tracks I think you could say you have one above average. I'm sure there are hounds out there that put up better numbers, I am still looking for that one that does. Just an observation from my limited experience in these Southern Ohio woodlots.


Posted by Rip on 02-04-2007 04:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by John D
I don't like the choices because it only counts out of trees made.

I'd count the number of trees made with coon in them versus the number of times the dog is cut loose.

A dog quitting a track and coming in, or one that has to be called in because it doesn't appear he'll ever end the track, is no better than one that slick trees, to me.



That's dictated by area too John. Where I did most of my huntin before moving here you might go an hour before the dogs struck anything.

So is it the dogs fault that hunted an hour and nothing was there? How does that reflect the dogs accuracy? My dogs were used to it and got treed SOMEWHERE, but when people brought dogs and didn't do any good I never took it as the dog wasn't accurate so much as the dog wasn't used to having to hunt an hour to strike a track.

Then you got the whole ground hole thing there. Do you really want your dog to tree in the ground and walk up the side of the mountain just to see the hole? Up there a very, very large number of coons den in the ground. I've shot them out only to have them bounce one time and go in the ground. The dogs can't help that the mountian is limestone and hollow with holes that go deep underground every few feet.

Course after many "Prayer Meetins" with them they quit treein in the ground but most locate the hole and then go try to find another coon, or come back in whichever that particular dog does. It ain't the dogs fault, but you sure can't count that for him either.

With all the regional factors I think the statement "If you go into a tree EXPECTING to see a coon then you got an accurate dog" is about the best we can do.

__________________
Let's go huntin


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13 AM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club