UKC Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 37 posts from this thread on one page

UKC Forums (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/index.php)
- UKC Coonhounds (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=4)
-- Score This! (http://forums.ukcdogs.com/showthread.php?threadid=486473)


Posted by Mossybuck on 02-27-2012 03:10 PM:

Score This!

4 dog cast.

Strike
A 100
B 75
C 50
D 25

Tree
A 125
B 50
C 25
D 75

All dogs were thought to be on the same tree. When calling them treed.

While going into the tree its determined that dogs are split.

C & D are handled on tree.

Cast proceeds 50 yards deeper to Dog B to handle. Cast decides to score Dog B's tree while there. Dog B is moved up to 125 tree. Tree is slick.


Dog A has its head down barking on the ground in between (C & D's tree) and Dog B's tree. So he is -125, but not handled yet.


Cast goes to Dogs C & D to score the tree. Dog A comes in and starts treeing and is handled. Coon is seen.

Note: Dog A never showed treed while we were in there except when we were scoring C & D, but was definitely treeing before. Assume he was on the same tree as C & D.

A -225
B -200
C ?
D ?

__________________
John Queen

NITE.CH Ragged Ridge Reba HTX
GR.CH NITE.CH Hillbilly's Latenite Hope
Ragged Ridge Tap


Posted by primetime on 02-27-2012 03:20 PM:

Dog A would be minused his strike.

__________________
Primetime Kennels
Home of
NTCHCH Primetime Northern Blue Maude
NtCH Northern Blue Killer II
PR Northern Blue Moon
PR Primetime Blue Sasha
PR Primetime Blue Arrow
Gone But Not Forgotten
NTCHCH Northern Blue Blazin Jade
NTCHCH Northern Blue Killer


Posted by StrawberryMt on 02-27-2012 03:26 PM:

A screwed it up for everyone. No one should have moved up cause you don't know which tree dog a left.by the way a's strike is minused cause a coon is seen.

__________________
your either making dust or your eating it
Travis Stirek
425-530-6649
http://stirekcanineservices.weebly.com


Posted by StrawberryMt on 02-27-2012 03:28 PM:

guess you could make an argument to move B up to 75 tree and c up to 50 but not 125 for b cause like I said you don't know what tree dog a left. s
so I say A -225 B-150 C+100 D +100

__________________
your either making dust or your eating it
Travis Stirek
425-530-6649
http://stirekcanineservices.weebly.com


Posted by JiM on 02-27-2012 03:49 PM:

I'd leave C&D where they are on the card and plus'em.

__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.


Posted by Mossybuck on 02-27-2012 03:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JiM
I'd leave C&D where they are on the card and plus'em.


That is what we did, but would C not need to be moved to 3rd tree since B was split?

__________________
John Queen

NITE.CH Ragged Ridge Reba HTX
GR.CH NITE.CH Hillbilly's Latenite Hope
Ragged Ridge Tap


Posted by 2ndToNone on 02-27-2012 04:52 PM:

Dog A minus strike point all other dogs stay as is no dogs move up in tree points that's the way I have always seen it scored besides dog B he would move up to 125 tree points


Posted by groworg1 on 02-27-2012 06:41 PM:

what if dog b had a coon? for all we know dog a could have been first on dog b tree since it was a split and dog a was barking on ground between trees when cast arrives he gets his minus for not being on tree all others move up a split is a split is a split and dog a minus track for comming into closed tree coon seen dog a 225- dog b 200- dog c 125+ dog d 150+ now if dog b had coon 200+ rest stay the same tell me i'm wrong


Posted by Dale Young on 02-27-2012 07:32 PM:

A -- 225 minus--1st strike & off the tree (100+125)

B --200 minus --3rd treed-- SPLIT & slick & holding 2nd strike (75+125)

C--100 plus--3rd strike & last treed & moves up next available because of B split. (50+25+25)

D--100 plus--last strike & 2nd tree with A holding 1st tree (25+75)

That's my guess.


Posted by Cowboyred on 02-27-2012 08:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by StrawberryMt
guess you could make an argument to move B up to 75 tree and c up to 50 but not 125 for b cause like I said you don't know what tree dog a left. s
so I say A -225 B-150 C+100 D +100


But I'll bet dog B's handler would have been all too happy to move up 75 points for being split. Afterwords though he'd probably be happy to score it the way you have it LOL.


Posted by john Duemmer on 02-27-2012 08:42 PM:

This scenario makes my head hurt but i remember in the past a ruling on a similar situation that used a ROOT tree system. Jim would probably remember.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside


Posted by elvis on 02-28-2012 09:21 AM:

B stays at 75
C and D move up to 125 and 75.


Posted by on 02-28-2012 01:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by elvis
B stays at 75
C and D move up to 125 and 75.



This is correct, I remember the root tree ruling makes no sense to me but that’s how they rule it. Its PKC that says you didn’t know what tree A left so no one moves. That’s not how UKC scores it.


Posted by Mossybuck on 02-28-2012 02:20 PM:

Why would B not move to 125 when it is split by itself?

__________________
John Queen

NITE.CH Ragged Ridge Reba HTX
GR.CH NITE.CH Hillbilly's Latenite Hope
Ragged Ridge Tap


Posted by Dale Young on 02-28-2012 02:40 PM:

I went with the root tree being the tree C & D were on since A who was holding first tree was off the tree and D was holding 2nd tree. With A wandering around it would be a guess as to the root tree .
A question : when A is minused for being off the tree do the dogs move up or is 1st on that tree just -125 for A and the rest scored as called ?


Posted by Tully on 02-28-2012 03:41 PM:

What you assume before you get there holds no bearing.

If you never saw A on a tree when you walked in, it gets minused its tree points, and all other dogs move up accordingly. If dog A comes in after the 5 it is also minused it's strike for coming in after judge, and coon being seen.

D-150+
C-125+
B-200-
A-225-

You can't assume they are all together, and what tree is what from the trucks. Take the "WHAT IF" out of it. When you walked in there were 2 dogs on 1 tree, 1 split, and one that isn't treed. Move dogs up and score accordingly.

__________________
It's just a game!
Tully Beeghly
Liscomb, IA

Grnitech Grch4 $KC Ch Sky's Bawlin' Blue Rocket
Rocket's Dowd Creed Wack
Emma's Blue Power Amigo
Ch Rocket's T&T Gnarly Blue Smash
00 Dowd Creek Wack
Rocket's Dowd Creek Lil Deuce

641-352-0706


Posted by StrawberryMt on 02-28-2012 05:15 PM:

Alright Allen,time to jump in!

__________________
your either making dust or your eating it
Travis Stirek
425-530-6649
http://stirekcanineservices.weebly.com


Posted by Mossybuck on 02-28-2012 06:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tully

You can't assume they are all together, and what tree is what from the trucks. Take the "WHAT IF" out of it.



You're exactly right. Dog A had a very over powering mouth. He could have been on either tree. "I" just assumed him to be on C & D's tree, the others could argue different. Dog B was split in a straight line with us and the other dogs. We couldn't tell for sure they were split until we were up on them.

Everyone in the cast had a different opinion on how it should have been scored. It was about like the answers on this thread.

Just want to know how to score it CORRECTLY the next time this happens!

__________________
John Queen

NITE.CH Ragged Ridge Reba HTX
GR.CH NITE.CH Hillbilly's Latenite Hope
Ragged Ridge Tap


Posted by blueticker on 02-28-2012 06:41 PM:

Dog A gets -125 for leaving a tree, Dog B gets -125 tree and 50 strike minus for the slick. C & D gets moved to +125 & +75 on the tree points and strike plused. I score it on what I see and is apparent.

You can't say dog C & D didn't split tree when called and the same goes for B. You can say A left a tree and deserves 125- and the others were split on different trees. Which deserves two first tree points. A could have been with C and D or possibly B, all speculation. If A would have been treed in between the other two trees with a coon no minus and 125 plus on three seperate trees. I like to score situations as I see them, not hear or speculation.

p.s. dog A gets a strike minus when comming to the tree when coon is seen.

__________________
Home Of:
Gr Nt Ch, Ch Natural Smokey River Irene a coondog (Mailes Bob X Nt Ch Utchman Blue Two)
Gr Nt Ch Natural Smokey River Flo UKC Top 20 placing 15th UKC World 2011, top 100 2014 (Rebel x Mailes Lil)


The Hounds I Enjoyed Hunting:
Dual Gr Natural Smokey River Rebel, A buddy of mine
Gr. Nt Natural Blue Echo ( Gr Nt Quail Ck Jimmy X Nt Ch Natural Blue Bell)
Gr Nt Smokey River Chief's Joe (JBS Chief X Gr Nt Jeans Ruby)
Gr. Nt. Ch. Natural Smokey River Lucy (Chief's Joe X Muggins)
And Many More


Posted by mleck on 02-28-2012 06:57 PM:

I would leave C&D on the card the way they are and plused expect Dog C could move to third tree. Dog B recieves 150 minus for the slick and could be moved to second tree.

No dog can move up to first tree without knowing where dog A was treed.

Had a situation just like this occur on a hunt in Missoui about three months ago. this was scored liek this by another judge, it was my dog that was not able to move up on a split tree where she was treed another 100 yards down the creek and I thought it was scored correctly then and it cost me a NT Ch. loosing the hunt 725+ to 700+. I would have moved from second tree to first tree.


A is minused tree points and strike if comes into tree with the coon in it.

__________________
GR. Ch. GR. Nt. Ch. Natural Smokey River Ruby HTX

PR. NT CH. Lecks KS. RebelxPatch Reba. co-owned with Ethan seller

From the past and greatly missed!!!!

GR. NT. CH. Leck's KS Tree Assassins Patches HTX
GR. CH. GR. NT. CH. Greens Okla River Gabby


Posted by Mossybuck on 02-28-2012 07:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by mleck
I would leave C&D on the card the way they are and plused expect Dog C could move to third tree. Dog B recieves 150 minus for the slick and could be moved to second tree.

No dog can move up to first tree without knowing where dog A was treed.

Had a situation just like this occur on a hunt in Missoui about three months ago. this was scored liek this by another judge, it was my dog that was not able to move up on a split tree where she was treed another 100 yards down the creek and I thought it was scored correctly then and it cost me a NT Ch. loosing the hunt 725+ to 700+. I would have moved from second tree to first tree.


A is minused tree points and strike if comes into tree with the coon in it.



Your probably right!

__________________
John Queen

NITE.CH Ragged Ridge Reba HTX
GR.CH NITE.CH Hillbilly's Latenite Hope
Ragged Ridge Tap


Posted by Dan Dogs on 02-28-2012 07:26 PM:

just keep everything as it was recorded and pluss or minus as where they were. either way someone will be pissed. lol

__________________
Home of:
- Gr. Nite Ch. Iowa County Crybabe
- Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan
- Gr. CH Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan II
- CH. Gr. Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan III 2008 Performance Sire
- CH. Gr.Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Dan IV 2004 ukc world hunt finalist
- Ch. Gr.Nite Ch. Mounds Creek Sassy II
- Nite Ch. Hickory Nut Bucky HTX 3 wins towards grnite
- GrCh.GrNtCh Hickory Nut Bawlie HTX
-Nite ch. PR Iowa County CryBaby II 2013 Badger State Hunt Champion
qualified for 2013 UKC World Hunt
CH Nitech She Hate Me (scar) HTX Iowa County Kennels


Posted by groworg1 on 02-28-2012 07:49 PM:

dog a is called treed but is not treed unless he shows tree


Posted by WEBBER on 02-28-2012 08:32 PM:

How soon ya'll rule gurus forget!



Originally posted by Allen / UKC
Seems like I may have some of you very confused. Possibly because of my terminolgy or lack thereof. Please allow me to make this very clear. First, I am well aware of page 99 in the Advisor. What Todd Kellam wrote there has not changed. Not one bit.

My question is this; how is the situation on page 99 of the Advisor and the scenario posted by Mr. Hagood even related? Please read both of them again. The difference in the two is that in Darrell’s scenario dog C is “obviously” split from A.

Again, I guess I wasn't clear enough. We're talking about situations where you have dogs declared treed, then, when you get to the tree you find one or more has left and the rest are on separate trees. (split wasn’t "obvious" until you got there and "saw" it.) You don't really know which tree the running dog(s) actually left, therefore, making it a confusing or difficult situation to score.

What I am "trying" to get across is that in situations where it was never "obvious" that any of the dogs were split (until you got to the tree and "saw" it), and to have a consistent way of scoring these difficult situations, use dog A's tree as the "root". Why? Because according to Rule 11 a judge never declares a dog split unless it is obvious or until at a point when it does become obvious. In some instances it doesn’t become obvious until you get there and see it; as in Darrell’s scenario and in the examples shown below.

If we stick with that theory or rule of thumb that we score dogs as being on the same tree “unless or until” it becomes obvious then we have a consistent way of scoring these difficult situations. May not always be exactly what happened but neither are any other ways you might use to score them. At least we have a method to use that’s consistent and probably as fair as any other options if you really think about it. And, if you haven’t learned that the breaks don’t always go your way then you haven’t been huntin’ long enough.

Example 1 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving dog C is gone and dog D is on a separate tree.

Tree Points:
Dog A = 125
Dog B = 75
Dog C = 50-
Dog D = 125

Example 2 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving dogs A and D are treed together. Dog B is on a separate tree and Dog C is gone.

Tree Points:
Dog A = 125
Dog B = 125
Dog C = 75- (moved up one tree position because B is on separate tree)
Dog D = 50 (moved up one tree position because dog B is on separate tree)

Example 3 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving dog A is gone. B, C and D are treed together.

Tree points:
Dog A = 125-
Dog B = 75
Dog C = 50
Dog D = 25
( this example is similar to TK’s scenario on page 99 of the Advisor – difference is three dogs stayed instead of just the one.)

Example 4 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving dog A is gone. B and C are treeing together and D is on a separate tree.

Tree points:
Dog A = 125-
Dog B = 75
Dog C = 50
Dog D = 125

Example 5 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving A is on one tree. B and C are both gone. D is on separate tree.

Tree points:
Dog A = 125
Dog B = 75-
Dog C = 50-
Dog D = 125

Example 6 -
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving A is gone. B and D are treed together and C is on a separate tree.

Tree Points:
Dog A = 125-
Dog B = 75
Dog C = 125
Dog D = 50 (moved up one position because C is on separate tree.)

Example 7 –
Dogs A, B, C and D are declared treed in that order. Upon arriving dogs A and B are gone. C is on one tree and D is on a separate tree.

Tree points:
Dog A = 125-
Dog B = 75-
Dog C = 50
Dog D = 125
(this one will likely bring on the biggest argument, but again, it is staying consistent with the theory of using the root tree. Why? Because it was never obvious that the dogs were split until the cast arrived and “saw” D on a separate tree. We don’t assume A and B were anywhere else other than with C because it wasn’t obvious.)

Hopefully, these examples will help a little to get the idea and eliminate any confusion. Especially, in regards to page 99 of the Advisor as the two situations are not really related.

__________________
"Believe Nothing You Hear and Only Half of What You See."


Posted by WEBBER on 02-28-2012 08:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dale Young
A -- 225 minus--1st strike & off the tree (100+125)

B --200 minus --3rd treed-- SPLIT & slick & holding 2nd strike (75+125)

C--100 plus--3rd strike & last treed & moves up next available because of B split. (50+25+25)

D--100 plus--last strike & 2nd tree with A holding 1st tree (25+75)

That's my guess.



This would be the correct according to Allen's scenarios.

__________________
"Believe Nothing You Hear and Only Half of What You See."


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 37 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.
Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club